Dändliker Lena, Brünecke Isabel, Citterio Paola, Lochmatter Fabienne, Buchmann Marlis, Grütter Jeanine
Jacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 25;12:733683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733683. eCollection 2021.
This study investigated whether school closures and health-related uncertainties in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic posed risk factors for adolescents' mental health and whether perceived social support by parents, teachers, and friends functioned as protective factors. In particular, we argued that perceived social support would buffer negative associations between educational and health concerns and mental health. Based on a person-centered approach, we first examined resilience profiles. These profiles reflect configurations regarding the levels of these risk and protective factors and levels of mental health. Second, we analyzed whether these risk and protective factors predicted adolescents' mental health differently by using a variable-centered approach. The sample consisted of 1'562 adolescents (age = 16.18, = 1.48, range = 14-20 years; 72% females) in lower and higher secondary education from three regions: German-speaking part of Switzerland, = 486; Italian-speaking part of Switzerland, = 760; and Northern Italy = 316. Results from the person-centered approach revealed three latent profiles characterized by low (19%), average (47%), or high resilience (34%). Lower resilience was associated with higher educational concerns, lower perceived social support, and lower mental health, while high resilience was characterized by lower concerns, higher support, and higher mental health. Importantly, educational concerns varied more between profiles than health concerns, and perceived teacher and family support varied more than perceived friend support. Corroborating these findings, the variable-centered approach (i.e., a path analysis) revealed that educational concerns were a stronger predictor than health concerns and pointed to a higher relative importance of perceived family support for adolescents' mental health relative to perceived teacher and friend support. Taken together, the findings suggest that adolescents' educational concerns and perceived family support, respectively, were stronger risk and protective factors for their mental health during school closures related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, adolescents from regions being more exposed to the COVID-19 pandemic, namely, Italian-speaking part of Switzerland and Northern Italy, were more likely classified in the low or the average rather than in the high resilience profile compared to students from the region with lower exposure, that is, the German-speaking part of Switzerland.
本研究调查了在新冠疫情早期阶段学校关闭和与健康相关的不确定性是否构成青少年心理健康的风险因素,以及父母、教师和朋友给予的感知社会支持是否起到保护作用。具体而言,我们认为感知社会支持会缓冲教育和健康担忧与心理健康之间的负面关联。基于以人为本的方法,我们首先考察了复原力概况。这些概况反映了这些风险和保护因素的水平以及心理健康水平的组合情况。其次,我们采用以变量为中心的方法分析了这些风险和保护因素对青少年心理健康的预测是否存在差异。样本包括来自三个地区(瑞士德语区,n = 486;瑞士意大利语区,n = 760;意大利北部,n = 316)的1562名初、高中学生(年龄 = 16.18,标准差 = 1.48,范围 = 14 - 20岁;72%为女性)。以人为本方法的结果显示出三种潜在概况,其特征分别为低复原力(19%)、中等复原力(47%)或高复原力(34%)。较低的复原力与较高的教育担忧、较低的感知社会支持和较低的心理健康相关,而高复原力的特征是担忧较低、支持较高和心理健康较高。重要的是,教育担忧在不同概况之间的差异大于健康担忧,并且感知到的教师和家庭支持的差异大于感知到的朋友支持。与这些发现一致,以变量为中心的方法(即路径分析)表明,教育担忧比健康担忧是更强的预测因素,并且指出相对于感知到的教师和朋友支持,感知到的家庭支持对青少年心理健康的相对重要性更高。综上所述,研究结果表明,在与新冠疫情相关的学校关闭期间,青少年的教育担忧和感知到的家庭支持分别是其心理健康更强的风险和保护因素。最后,与接触程度较低的地区(即瑞士德语区)的学生相比,来自受新冠疫情影响更大地区(即瑞士意大利语区和意大利北部)的青少年更有可能被归类为低复原力或中等复原力概况,而非高复原力概况。