• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向数字健康公平 - 在 COVID-19 时代,弱势群体在使用数字健康服务方面所面临挑战的定性研究。

Towards digital health equity - a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era.

机构信息

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.

Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 54, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 12;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07584-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-07584-4
PMID:35151302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8840681/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has given an unprecedented boost to already increased digital health services, which can place many vulnerable groups at risk of digital exclusion. To improve the likelihood of achieving digital health equity, it is necessary to identify and address the elements that may prevent vulnerable groups from benefiting from digital health services. This study examined the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Qualitative descriptive design was utilized. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2020 and May 2021. The participants (N = 74) were older adults, migrants, mental health service users, high users of health services, and the unemployed. Qualitative content analysis with both inductive and deductive approach was used to analyze the data. Challenges related to the use of digital health services were interpreted through digital determinants of health from the Digital Health Equity Framework.

RESULTS

For most of the participants the access to digital health services was hampered by insufficient digital, and / or local language skills. The lack of support and training, poor health, as well as the lack of strong e-identification or suitable devices also prevented the access. Digital services were not perceived to be applicable for all situations or capable of replacing face-to-face services due to the poor communication in the digital environment. Fears and the lack of trust regarding digital platforms were expressed as well as concerns related to the security of the services. Contact with a health care professional was also considered less personal and more prone to misunderstandings in the digital environment than in face-to-face services. Finally, digital alternatives were not always available as desired by participants, or participants were unaware of existing digital services and their value.

CONCLUSION

Several development needs in the implementation of digital health services were identified that could improve equal access to and benefits gained from digital services in the future. While digital health services are increasing, traditional face-to-face services will still need to be offered alongside the digital ones to ensure equal access to services.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情大流行使得数字医疗服务得到了前所未有的增长,这可能使许多弱势群体面临数字排斥的风险。为了提高实现数字健康公平的可能性,有必要确定并解决可能阻止弱势群体从数字医疗服务中受益的因素。本研究考察了弱势群体在新冠疫情期间使用数字医疗服务时所面临的挑战。

方法

采用定性描述设计。于 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 5 月间进行了半结构式访谈。参与者(N=74)包括老年人、移民、精神卫生服务使用者、高频率使用卫生服务者和失业者。使用定性内容分析法(结合归纳和演绎方法)对数据进行分析。通过数字健康公平框架中的数字健康决定因素来解释与数字医疗服务使用相关的挑战。

结果

对于大多数参与者来说,数字和/或当地语言技能不足限制了他们获取数字医疗服务的机会。缺乏支持和培训、健康状况不佳、缺乏强大的电子身份识别或合适的设备也阻碍了服务的获取。由于数字环境中的沟通不畅,数字服务被认为并不适用于所有情况,也无法替代面对面服务。参与者还表达了对数字平台的恐惧和不信任,以及对服务安全性的担忧。与医疗保健专业人员的联系也被认为在数字环境中不如面对面服务那么有个人感,更容易产生误解。最后,数字替代方案并不总是如参与者所愿可用,或者参与者不知道现有的数字服务及其价值。

结论

确定了数字医疗服务实施中需要改进的几个发展需求,这将有助于未来改善数字服务的平等获取和受益。虽然数字医疗服务在不断增加,但仍需要提供传统的面对面服务,以确保服务的平等获取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b0a/8840681/8735cf115e22/12913_2022_7584_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b0a/8840681/8735cf115e22/12913_2022_7584_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b0a/8840681/8735cf115e22/12913_2022_7584_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards digital health equity - a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era.迈向数字健康公平 - 在 COVID-19 时代,弱势群体在使用数字健康服务方面所面临挑战的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 12;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07584-4.
2
Challenges Experienced by Saudi Patients With Cancer and Their Family Caregivers in Using Digital Healthcare Technology Platforms in the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,沙特癌症患者及其家庭护理人员在使用数字医疗保健技术平台方面遇到的挑战。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2024 Jul 1;42(7):495-503. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001087.
3
Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A co-produced framework analysis.服务使用者在 COVID-19 大流行期间对远程心理健康的体验和看法:一个共同制定的框架分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 16;16(9):e0257270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257270. eCollection 2021.
4
Digital Health Equity and COVID-19: The Innovation Curve Cannot Reinforce the Social Gradient of Health.数字健康公平与新冠疫情:创新曲线无法强化健康方面的社会梯度。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e19361. doi: 10.2196/19361.
5
Supporting population mental health and wellness during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: protocol for a sequential mixed-method study.在加拿大 COVID-19 大流行期间支持人口心理健康和健康:一项序贯混合方法研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 18;11(11):e052259. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052259.
6
Health equity related challenges and experiences during the rapid implementation of virtual care during COVID-19: a multiple case study.在 COVID-19 期间快速实施虚拟护理过程中与健康公平相关的挑战和经验:一项多案例研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Mar 11;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01849-y.
7
The experience of Australian general practice patients at high risk of poor health outcomes with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.澳大利亚全科医学患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用远程医疗的健康不良结局高风险体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Apr 8;22(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01408-w.
8
Remote mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland and the Netherlands: a qualitative study.芬兰和荷兰在新冠疫情期间的远程心理健康服务:一项定性研究。
Discov Ment Health. 2024 Aug 30;4(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s44192-024-00088-z.
9
Migrants and Service Providers' Perspectives of Barriers to Accessing Mental Health Services in South Australia: A Case of African Migrants with a Refugee Background in South Australia.南澳大利亚州移民和服务提供者获取心理健康服务障碍的观点:以在南澳大利亚州的具有难民背景的非洲移民为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 24;18(17):8906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178906.
10
PERSPECTIVE: A Mental Health Services Research Agenda in the Era of COVID-19: Steadfast Commitment to Addressing Evolving Challenges.观点:新冠疫情时代的精神卫生服务研究议程:坚定致力于应对不断变化的挑战。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2021 Dec 1;24(4):137-142.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital health literacy is linked to attitudes regarding the ethical aspects of digital health among patients with dermatologic comorbidities.数字健康素养与患有皮肤病合并症患者对数字健康伦理方面的态度相关。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 5;20(9):e0330916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330916. eCollection 2025.
2
Determinants of mistrust in digital health research and approaches to address them among Muslim ethnic minorities living in the United Kingdom: a qualitative study.英国穆斯林少数族裔对数字健康研究不信任的决定因素及解决方法:一项定性研究
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Aug 15;24(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02583-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Digital inequality in communication during a time of physical distancing: The case of COVID-19.物理距离限制时期通信中的数字不平等:以新冠疫情为例
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Jul;120:106717. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106717. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
The Associations Between Mental Health Problems and Attitudes Toward Web-Based Health and Social Care Services: Evidence From a Finnish Population-Based Study.心理健康问题与对基于网络的健康和社会保健服务的态度之间的关联:来自芬兰基于人群的研究的证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 21;23(9):e28066. doi: 10.2196/28066.
3
Digital Information Technology Use, Self-Rated Health, and Depression: Population-Based Analysis of a Survey Study on Older Migrants.
The evolution of barriers and facilitators to using a COPD app among older adults: results from a pilot study.
老年人使用慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)应用程序的障碍与促进因素的演变:一项试点研究的结果
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jul 14;7:1557590. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1557590. eCollection 2025.
4
Enhancing Healthcare for People with Disabilities Through Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from Saudi Arabia.通过人工智能改善残疾人医疗保健:来自沙特阿拉伯的证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 6;13(13):1616. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131616.
5
Key digital health literacy competencies for citizens - A Delphi study.公民的关键数字健康素养能力——一项德尔菲研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 3;11:20552076251357375. doi: 10.1177/20552076251357375. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Bridging the digital divide: Understanding COVID-19 diagnostic and vaccination experiences in a socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhood in Sweden.弥合数字鸿沟:了解瑞典一个社会经济弱势社区的新冠病毒诊断和疫苗接种经历。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13033-9.
7
Editorial: Designing and evaluating digital health interventions.社论:数字健康干预措施的设计与评估
Front Digit Health. 2025 May 8;7:1612380. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1612380. eCollection 2025.
8
Coupled coordination relationship and enhancement path between digital economy and essential public health services in China.中国数字经济与基本公共卫生服务的耦合协调关系及提升路径
Front Public Health. 2025 May 7;13:1517353. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1517353. eCollection 2025.
9
A Digital Home-Based Health Care Center for Remote Monitoring of Side Effects During Breast Cancer Therapy: Prospective, Single-Arm, Monocentric Feasibility Study.用于远程监测乳腺癌治疗期间副作用的数字家庭医疗保健中心:前瞻性、单臂、单中心可行性研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 May 2;11:e64083. doi: 10.2196/64083.
10
The Motivations of Citizens to Attend an eHealth Course in the Public Library: Qualitative Interview Study.公民参加公共图书馆电子健康课程的动机:定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 28;9:e60612. doi: 10.2196/60612.
数字信息技术使用、自评健康和抑郁:基于人群的老年移民调查研究分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 14;23(6):e20988. doi: 10.2196/20988.
4
Remote care for mental health: qualitative study with service users, carers and staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.远程心理健康护理:COVID-19 大流行期间对服务使用者、护理人员和工作人员的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 22;11(4):e049210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049210.
5
e-Mental health care for people living with dementia: A lesson on digital equality from COVID-19.为痴呆症患者提供的电子心理健康护理:来自新冠疫情的数字平等教训。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2020 Oct 9;12(1):e12100. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12100. eCollection 2020.
6
Cumulative social disadvantage and hospitalisations due to ambulatory care-sensitive conditions in Finland in 2011─2013: a register study.2011 - 2013年芬兰因门诊护理敏感疾病导致的累积社会劣势与住院情况:一项登记研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e038338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038338.
7
Superdiversity, migration and use of internet-based health information - results of a cross-sectional survey conducted in 4 European countries.超多样性、移民和互联网健康信息的使用 - 在 4 个欧洲国家进行的横断面调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):1263. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09329-6.
8
Digital Divide in Perceived Benefits of Online Health Care and Social Welfare Services: National Cross-Sectional Survey Study.数字鸿沟对在线医疗保健和社会福利服务感知益处的影响:全国横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):e17616. doi: 10.2196/17616.
9
When Going Digital Becomes a Necessity: Ensuring Older Adults' Needs for Information, Services, and Social Inclusion During COVID-19.当数字化成为必需品:在 COVID-19 期间确保老年人对信息、服务和社会包容的需求。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):460-470. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1771237. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
10
Digital Health Equity and COVID-19: The Innovation Curve Cannot Reinforce the Social Gradient of Health.数字健康公平与新冠疫情:创新曲线无法强化健康方面的社会梯度。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e19361. doi: 10.2196/19361.