Suppr超能文献

测量青少年大脑认知发展 (ABCD) 研究中的保留率。

Measuring retention within the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Interdisciplinary Neuroscience, University of Rhode Island, Chafee Hall, 130 Flagg Road, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

出版信息

Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Apr;54:101081. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101081. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

Abstract

The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study aims to retain a demographically diverse sample of youth and one parent across 21 sites throughout its 10-year protocol while minimizing selective (systematic) attrition. To evaluate the effectiveness of these efforts, the ABCD Retention Workgroup (RW) has employed a data-driven approach to examine, track, and intervene via three key metrics: (1) which youth completed visits late; (2) which youth missed visits; and (3) which youth withdrew from the study. The RW actively examines demographic (race, education level, family income) and site factors (visit satisfaction, distance from site, and enrollment in ancillary studies) to strategize efforts that will minimize disengagement and loss of participating youth and parents. Data showed that the most robust primary correlates of late visits were distance from study site, race, and parental education level. Race, lower parental education level, parental employment status, and lower family income were associated with higher odds of missed visits, while being enrolled in one of the ancillary studies was associated with lower odds of missed visits. Additionally, parents who were primary Spanish speakers withdrew at slightly higher rates. These findings provide insight into future targets for proactive retention efforts by the ABCD RW.

摘要

青少年大脑认知发展 (ABCD) 研究旨在保留一个具有代表性的多样化的青年和一个家长的样本,跨越 21 个地点,在其 10 年的协议,同时尽量减少选择性(系统)流失。为了评估这些努力的效果,ABCD 保留工作组 (RW) 采用了数据驱动的方法,通过三个关键指标来检查、跟踪和干预:(1) 哪些青少年延迟完成访问;(2) 哪些青少年错过访问;(3) 哪些青少年退出了研究。RW 积极检查人口统计学(种族、教育水平、家庭收入)和地点因素(访问满意度、与地点的距离以及参与辅助研究),制定策略,尽量减少参与的青少年和家长的脱离和损失。数据显示,延迟访问的最主要的相关因素是与研究地点的距离、种族和父母的教育水平。种族、父母较低的教育水平、父母的就业状况和较低的家庭收入与错过访问的几率较高有关,而参加辅助研究之一与错过访问的几率较低有关。此外,主要讲西班牙语的父母的退出率略高。这些发现为 ABCD RW 的积极保留工作提供了未来目标的见解。

相似文献

2
Approaching Retention within the ABCD Study.ABCD 研究中的保留问题探讨。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Aug;32:130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

5
Longitudinal analysis of the ABCD® study.ABCD® 研究的纵向分析。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Apr;72:101518. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101518. Epub 2025 Feb 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验