• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境影响标签对食品购买可持续性的影响:实验性在线超市中的随机对照试验。

Effects of environmental impact labels on the sustainability of food purchases: A randomised controlled trial in an experimental online supermarket.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food and Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 3;19(9):e0309386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309386. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0309386
PMID:39226274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11371233/
Abstract

Providing consumers with product-specific environmental impact information for food products (ecolabels) may promote more sustainable purchasing, needed to meet global environmental targets. This UK study (N = 1051 participants) investigated the effectiveness of different ecolabels using an experimental online supermarket platform, comparing three labels against control (no label). Significant reductions were found in the environmental impact score (EIS) for all labels compared to control (labels presented: values for four environmental indicators [-3.9 percentiles, 95%CIs: -5.3, -2.6]; a composite score [taking values from A to E; -3.9, 95%CIs: -5.2,-2.5]; or both together [-3.2, 95%CIs: -4.5, -1.9]). Providing ecolabels is a promising intervention to promote the selection of more sustainable products.

摘要

为食品产品(生态标签)提供特定于产品的环境影响信息,可以促进更可持续的购买,这是实现全球环境目标所必需的。这项英国研究(N=1051 名参与者)使用实验性的在线超市平台调查了不同生态标签的有效性,将三种标签与对照组(无标签)进行了比较。与对照组相比,所有标签的环境影响评分(EIS)都显著降低(标签展示:四个环境指标的数值[-3.9 个百分点,95%置信区间:-5.3,-2.6];综合评分[从 A 到 E 取值;-3.9,95%置信区间:-5.2,-2.5];或两者同时[-3.2,95%置信区间:-4.5,-1.9])。提供生态标签是一种很有前途的干预措施,可以促进选择更可持续的产品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16a7/11371233/e88d8b849326/pone.0309386.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16a7/11371233/afe359a6a9ee/pone.0309386.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16a7/11371233/e88d8b849326/pone.0309386.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16a7/11371233/afe359a6a9ee/pone.0309386.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16a7/11371233/e88d8b849326/pone.0309386.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of environmental impact labels on the sustainability of food purchases: A randomised controlled trial in an experimental online supermarket.环境影响标签对食品购买可持续性的影响:实验性在线超市中的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 3;19(9):e0309386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309386. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of environmental impact labels on the sustainability of food purchases: Two randomised controlled trials in an experimental online supermarket.环境影响标签对食品购买可持续性的影响:实验性在线超市中的两项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0272800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272800. eCollection 2022.
3
Effects of environmental impact and nutrition labelling on food purchasing: An experimental online supermarket study.环境影响和营养标签对食品购买的影响:一项在线超市实验研究
Appetite. 2023 Jan 1;180:106312. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106312. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
The impact of an eco-score label on US consumers' perceptions of environmental sustainability and intentions to purchase food: A randomized experiment.生态评分标签对美国消费者对环境可持续性的认知和购买食品意愿的影响:一项随机实验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0306123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306123. eCollection 2024.
5
Changing the availability and positioning of more vs. less environmentally sustainable products: A randomised controlled trial in an online experimental supermarket.改变更多与更少环境可持续产品的可得性和定位:在线实验性超市中的一项随机对照试验。
Appetite. 2024 Sep 1;200:107579. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107579. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
6
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.
7
Can Product Information Steer towards Sustainable and Healthy Food Choices? A Pilot Study in an Online Supermarket.产品信息能否引导人们做出可持续和健康的食物选择?一项在线超市的试点研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 19;19(3):1107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031107.
8
Perceptions and preferences for environmentally sustainable food and associated factors: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative survey of United States consumers.消费者对环境可持续性食品的认知和偏好及其影响因素:一项对美国消费者的全国代表性调查的横断面分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 Oct;120(4):804-813. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.07.026. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
9
Supermarket policies on less-healthy food at checkouts: Natural experimental evaluation using interrupted time series analyses of purchases.超市结账处销售健康程度较低食品的政策:使用购买中断时间序列分析的自然实验评估。
PLoS Med. 2018 Dec 18;15(12):e1002712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002712. eCollection 2018 Dec.
10
Traffic-light front-of-pack environmental labelling across food categories triggers more environmentally friendly food choices: a randomised controlled trial in virtual reality supermarket.跨食品类别的红绿灯式包装环境标签可促进更环保的食物选择:虚拟现实超市中的一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jan 26;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01410-8.

引用本文的文献

1
How Can Communication about Plant-based Foods Support Sustainable Food System Transformation? Nine Recommendations for Government, Industry and Citizens.关于植物性食品的交流如何支持可持续食品系统转型?给政府、企业和公民的九条建议。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025 Jun 28;12(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s40572-025-00489-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products.估算 57000 种食品的环境影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 16;119(33):e2120584119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120584119. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
2
The Effects of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Selection, Purchase, and Consumption of Food and Drink Products: A Systematic Review.环境可持续性标签对食品和饮料产品的选择、购买及消费的影响:一项系统综述
Environ Behav. 2021 Oct;53(8):891-925. doi: 10.1177/0013916521995473. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
3
Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods.
食物对健康和环境的多重影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 12;116(46):23357-23362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906908116. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
Nutrient composition databases in the age of big data: foodDB, a comprehensive, real-time database infrastructure.大数据时代的营养成分数据库:foodDB,一个全面、实时的数据库基础设施。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 27;9(6):e026652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026652.
5
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
7
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers.通过生产者和消费者减少食物对环境的影响。
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216.
8
Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption.用于更健康食品或非酒精饮料购买及消费的营养标签。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 27;2(2):CD009315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2.
9
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.