Health Management Training Institute, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Thua Thien Hue 491-20, Vietnam.
School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106-75, Taiwan.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 20;19(3):1139. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031139.
There is little knowledge about how the influence of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) reduces the COVID-19 infection rate during the period of vaccine rollout. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of NPIs on decreasing the epidemic growth of COVID-19 between before and after the vaccine rollout period among Asian countries. Our ecological study included observations from 30 Asian countries over the 20 weeks of the pre- and post-vaccination period. Data were extracted from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker and other open databases. Longitudinal analysis was utilized to evaluate the impacts of public health responses and vaccines. The facial covering policy was the most effective intervention in the pre-vaccination period, followed by border control and testing policies. In the post-vaccination period, restrictions on gatherings and public transport closure both play a key role in reducing the epidemic growth rate. Vaccine coverage of 1-5%, 5-10%, 10-30%, and over 30% of the population was linked with an average reduction of 0.12%, 0.32%, 0.31%, and 0.59%, respectively. Our findings support the evidence that besides the vaccine increasingly contributing to pandemic control, the implementation of NPIs also plays a key role.
关于非药物干预(NPIs)如何在疫苗推出期间降低 COVID-19 感染率,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在检验 NPIs 在亚洲国家疫苗推出前后对降低 COVID-19 疫情增长的有效性。我们的生态研究包括在疫苗接种前和后 20 周对 30 个亚洲国家的观察。数据取自牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器和其他公开数据库。纵向分析用于评估公共卫生应对和疫苗的影响。在疫苗接种前,面部遮盖政策是最有效的干预措施,其次是边境控制和检测政策。在疫苗接种后,集会限制和公共交通关闭都在降低疫情增长率方面发挥了关键作用。人口接种疫苗的比例为 1-5%、5-10%、10-30%和超过 30%,分别平均减少了 0.12%、0.32%、0.31%和 0.59%。我们的研究结果支持了以下证据,即除了疫苗越来越有助于控制大流行外,非药物干预的实施也发挥了关键作用。