Suppr超能文献

呼气末正压通气(PEEP)是否能降低气管插管周围误吸的发生率?

Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?

作者信息

Janson B A, Poulton T J

出版信息

Can Anaesth Soc J. 1986 Mar;33(2):157-61. doi: 10.1007/BF03010825.

Abstract

Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (SV). Two transparent plastic "tracheas" with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes simulated adult and paediatric airways respectively. Ten trials without PEEP and ten with PEEP at each of two different levels were completed for each model using both SV and MV. Simulated SV in both models was associated with seepage nearly 100 per cent of the time, regardless of PEEP level. During MV without PEEP, seepage occurred in 55 per cent of the adult trials and 100 per cent of the paediatric trials. In contrast, MV with 5 cmH2O PEEP produced seepage rates of 15 per cent in the adult model and 0 per cent in the paediatric model. Compared to trials without PEEP, seepage occurred less frequently, was reduced in amount and delayed in onset. MV with PEEP significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes.

摘要

尽管气管导管设计有所改进,但误吸仍然是肺部并发症的一个原因。这项体外研究评估了呼气末正压通气(PEEP)在机械通气(MV)和自主通气(SV)期间降低气管导管周围渗漏发生率的效果。两个带有带套囊和不带套囊气管导管的透明塑料“气管”分别模拟成人和儿童气道。对于每个模型,使用SV和MV分别完成了10次无PEEP试验和10次在两个不同水平的PEEP试验。在两个模型中,无论PEEP水平如何,模拟SV几乎在100%的时间内都伴有渗漏。在无PEEP的MV期间,55%的成人试验和100%的儿童试验发生了渗漏。相比之下,在成人模型中,5 cmH2O PEEP的MV产生的渗漏率为15%,在儿童模型中为0%。与无PEEP的试验相比,渗漏发生频率更低、量减少且发生时间延迟。有PEEP的MV显著(p小于0.05)降低了气管导管周围渗漏的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验