• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

便捷参考-K:最新手持式自动验光角膜曲率计与Retinomax和Plusoptix在三岁以下儿童中的比较

HandyRef-K: Comparison of the Latest Handheld Auto Refracto-keratometer with Retinomax and Plusoptix in Patients Younger than Three Years of Age.

作者信息

Seymen Zeynep, Vural Esra, Eris Erdem, Vural Asli, Ogreden Tulin, Aslan Onder, Celebi Ali Riza Cenk, Perente Irfan

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences Istanbul Suleymaniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Ophthalmology, Mardin State Hospital, Mardin, Turkey.

出版信息

Beyoglu Eye J. 2019 Feb 26;4(1):32-37. doi: 10.14744/bej.2018.20591. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.14744/bej.2018.20591
PMID:35187429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8842038/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to compare the refractive error measurements of pediatric patients performed with a Plusoptix A09 photorefractor (PO; Plusoptix AG, Nuremberg, Germany), a Retinomax K-plus 3 (RTX; Right Group, Tokyo, Japan), and the new handheld auto refracto-keratometer, the Nidek HandyRef-K (HDY; Nidek SA, Créteil, France), and to evaluate the intermethods agreement.

METHODS

A total of 194 eyes of 194 children were included in the study. All of the children underwent refraction measurement with the PO before cycloplegia and 2 autorefractors were used after cycloplegia: the RTX and the HDY.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 16.65±10.04 months (range: 3-34 months). There were no statistically significant differences between the spherical values (SV) or cylindrical axis values (CAV) measured with the PO (SV: 1.61±1.79 diopters [D]; CAV: 94.25±72.47 D), the RTX (SV: 1.91±2.06 D; CAV: 94.3±73.44 D), and the HDY (SV: 1.89±2.04 D; CAV: 93.55±73.71 D) (p>0.05).There was a statistically significant difference in the cylindrical values (CV) assessed with the RTX (CV: -0.97±0.75 D) and the HDY (CV: -1.11±0.76 D) (p=0.003) and the HDY and the PO (CV: -0.92±0.68 D)(p=0.002), while there was no statistically significant difference between the values determined with the RTX and the PO (p>0.05). Statistically significant differences were demonstrated for spherical equivalent values (SEV) obtained with the RTX (SEV: 1.43±1.97 D) and the PO (SEV: 1.15±1.74 D) (p=0.02), and the HDY (SEV: 1.34±1.95 D) and the PO (p=0.03), but no significant difference was found between the RTX and the HDY values (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was found between the SEV measured by the RTX and the HDY, but the PO was significantly less hyperopic than the RTX and the HDY. The CV measured by HDY was higher than that of other devices. These devices can be used for screening in crowded pediatric ophthalmology clinics and may be an easier way of measuring refractive errors in children younger than 3 years of age, but high SEV and CV results should serve as an alert to physicians. It should also be kept in mind that cycloplegic retinoscopy is still the gold standard and these alternative methods can only be used for screening. The prescription of eyeglasses should not be made without cycloplegic retinoscopy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用Plusoptix A09验光仪(PO;德国纽伦堡Plusoptix AG公司)、Retinomax K-plus 3验光仪(RTX;日本东京Right Group公司)以及新型手持式自动验光角膜曲率计Nidek HandyRef-K(HDY;法国克雷泰伊Nidek SA公司)对儿科患者进行的屈光不正测量,并评估不同方法之间的一致性。

方法

本研究共纳入194名儿童的194只眼。所有儿童在睫状肌麻痹前使用PO进行验光测量,在睫状肌麻痹后使用两种自动验光仪:RTX和HDY。

结果

患者的平均年龄为16.65±10.04个月(范围:3 - 34个月)。使用PO测量的球镜值(SV:1.61±1.79屈光度[D])、柱镜轴位值(CAV:94.25±72.47 D),RTX测量的值(SV:1.91±2.06 D;CAV:94.3±73.44 D)以及HDY测量的值(SV:1.89±2.04 D;CAV:93.55±73.71 D)之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。RTX(柱镜值[CV]:-0.97±0.75 D)与HDY(CV:-1.11±0.76 D)以及HDY与PO(CV:-0.92±0.68 D)测量的CV存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.003和p = 0.002),而RTX与PO测量的值之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。RTX(等效球镜值[SEV]:1.43±1.97 D)与PO(SEV:1.15±1.74 D)以及HDY(SEV:1.34±1.95 D)与PO测量的SEV存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.02和p = 0.03),但RTX与HDY的值之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

RTX和HDY测量的SEV之间无显著差异,但PO的远视度数明显低于RTX和HDY。HDY测量的CV高于其他设备。这些设备可用于在拥挤的儿科眼科诊所进行筛查,可能是测量3岁以下儿童屈光不正的一种更简便方法,但高SEV和CV结果应引起医生警惕。还应牢记,睫状肌麻痹检影法仍是金标准,这些替代方法仅可用于筛查。未经睫状肌麻痹检影法不应开具眼镜处方。

相似文献

1
HandyRef-K: Comparison of the Latest Handheld Auto Refracto-keratometer with Retinomax and Plusoptix in Patients Younger than Three Years of Age.便捷参考-K:最新手持式自动验光角膜曲率计与Retinomax和Plusoptix在三岁以下儿童中的比较
Beyoglu Eye J. 2019 Feb 26;4(1):32-37. doi: 10.14744/bej.2018.20591. eCollection 2019.
2
Comparison of Adult Refractive Disorder Measurements Using HandyRef-K, Retinomax, Plusoptix, and Table-top Autorefractometer Devices.使用HandyRef-K、Retinomax、Plusoptix和台式自动验光仪设备对成人屈光不正测量结果的比较。
Beyoglu Eye J. 2021 Jun 8;6(2):108-114. doi: 10.14744/bej.2021.28247. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparison of the Plusoptix A09 and Retinomax K-Plus 3 with retinoscopy in children.儿童中Plusoptix A09和Retinomax K-Plus 3与检影验光的比较。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015 Jan-Feb;52(1):37-42. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20141230-06.
4
Comparison of the results of four different refraction measurement devices in children with retinoscopy.视网膜镜检查中四种不同屈光测量设备结果的比较。
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct-Dec;66(4):337-343. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2022.60.
5
Comparison of the Retinomax hand-held autorefractor versus table-top autorefractor and retinoscopy.手持Retinomax自动验光仪与台式自动验光仪及检影验光的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun 18;7(3):491-5. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.19. eCollection 2014.
6
Screening for refractive errors in children: the plusoptiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy.儿童屈光不正筛查:由非专业筛查人员使用plusoptiX S08和Retinomax K-plus2与睫状肌麻痹验光法进行比较。
J AAPOS. 2010 Dec;14(6):478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.09.015.
7
[Accuracy of two autorefractors--Pediatric Autorefractor plusoptiX and Retinomax--in cycloplegic children in comparison to retinoscopy].[两种自动验光仪——小儿自动验光仪plusoptiX和视网膜镜Retinomax——在睫状肌麻痹儿童中与检影验光相比的准确性]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010 Oct;227(10):792-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245734. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
8
Accuracy of PlusOptix A09 distance refraction in pediatric myopia and hyperopia.PlusOptix A09 验光仪在儿童近视和远视中的准确性
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 1;16:72. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0247-8.
9
Accuracy of Plusoptix S04 in children and teens.Plusoptix S04 在儿童和青少年中的准确性。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;46(2):153-7. doi: 10.3129/i10-110.
10
Comparison of the refractive measurements with hand-held autorefractometer, table-mounted autorefractometer and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.儿童手持式自动验光仪、台式自动验光仪与睫状肌麻痹检影验光的屈光测量比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;29(3):178-84. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2015.29.3.178. Epub 2015 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Retinoscopes: Past and present.检眼镜:过去与现在。
World J Methodol. 2024 Sep 20;14(3):91497. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i3.91497.
2
Method comparison and overview of refractive measurements in children: implications for myopia management.儿童屈光测量方法的比较和概述:对近视管理的影响。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 1;9(1):e001322. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001322.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis on the agreement of non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in children.系统评价和荟萃分析非睫状肌麻痹与睫状肌麻痹验光在儿童中的一致性。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Nov;42(6):1276-1288. doi: 10.1111/opo.13022. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
4
Comparison of Adult Refractive Disorder Measurements Using HandyRef-K, Retinomax, Plusoptix, and Table-top Autorefractometer Devices.使用HandyRef-K、Retinomax、Plusoptix和台式自动验光仪设备对成人屈光不正测量结果的比较。
Beyoglu Eye J. 2021 Jun 8;6(2):108-114. doi: 10.14744/bej.2021.28247. eCollection 2021.
5
Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study.儿童台式和手持式自动折射计的屈光结果:一项观察性横断面研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 9;21(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02199-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Pupillary measurements and anisocoria in Chinese preschoolers 3-4 years of age screened using the plusoptiX A12C.使用plusoptiX A12C对3至4岁中国学龄前儿童进行瞳孔测量和瞳孔不等大筛查。
J AAPOS. 2017 Aug;21(4):262.e1-262.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
2
Accuracy of PlusOptix A09 distance refraction in pediatric myopia and hyperopia.PlusOptix A09 验光仪在儿童近视和远视中的准确性
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 1;16:72. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0247-8.
3
Comparison of the refractive measurements with hand-held autorefractometer, table-mounted autorefractometer and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.儿童手持式自动验光仪、台式自动验光仪与睫状肌麻痹检影验光的屈光测量比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;29(3):178-84. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2015.29.3.178. Epub 2015 May 20.
4
Comparison of non-cycloplegic photorefraction, cycloplegic photorefraction and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.儿童非散瞳验光、散瞳验光及散瞳检影验光的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb 18;8(1):128-31. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.01.24. eCollection 2015.
5
Comparison of the Plusoptix A09 and Retinomax K-Plus 3 with retinoscopy in children.儿童中Plusoptix A09和Retinomax K-Plus 3与检影验光的比较。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015 Jan-Feb;52(1):37-42. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20141230-06.
6
Accuracy of the Retinomax K-plus3 in measuring refractive error in a pediatric population.Retinomax K-plus3在测量儿童人群屈光不正方面的准确性。
J AAPOS. 2014 Aug;18(4):327-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.02.017.
7
A comparison of different autorefractors with retinoscopy in children.不同自动验光仪与儿童检影验光的比较。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2012 Nov-Dec;49(6):370-7. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20120821-04. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
8
Is noncycloplegic photorefraction applicable for screening refractive amblyopia risk factors?非散瞳验光是否适用于筛查屈光性弱视的危险因素?
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2012 Jan;7(1):3-9.
9
ROC analysis of the accuracy of Noncycloplegic retinoscopy, Retinomax Autorefractor, and SureSight Vision Screener for preschool vision screening.ROC 分析非睫状肌麻痹视网膜镜、Retinomax 自动折射仪和 SureSight 视力筛查仪在学龄前视力筛查中的准确性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Dec 28;52(13):9658-64. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8559.
10
Screening for amblyopia risk factors in pre-verbal children using the Plusoptix photoscreener: a cross-sectional population-based study.使用 Plusoptix 视力筛查仪对婴幼儿进行弱视风险因素筛查:基于人群的横断面研究。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):83-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.190405. Epub 2011 Apr 21.