Suppr超能文献

社会经济不平等与多种疾病共存的理论解释:范围综述。

Theoretical explanations for socioeconomic inequalities in multimorbidity: a scoping review.

机构信息

Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 23;12(2):e055264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055264.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To document socioepidemiological theories used to explain the relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage and multimorbidity.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

A search strategy was developed and then applied to multiple electronic databases including Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Scielo, Applied Social Sciences, ERIC, Humanities Index and Sociological Abstracts. After the selection of studies, data were extracted using a data charting plan. The last search was performed on the 28 September 2021. Extracted data included: study design, country, population subgroups, measures of socioeconomic inequality, assessment of multimorbidity and conclusion on the association between socioeconomic variables and multimorbidity. Included studies were further assessed on their use of theory, type of theories used and context of application. Finally, we conducted a meta-narrative synthesis to summarise the results.

RESULTS

A total of 64 studies were included in the review. Of these, 33 papers included theories as explanations for the association between socioeconomic position and multimorbidity. Within this group, 16 explicitly stated those theories and five tested at least one theory. Behavioural theories (health behaviours) were the most frequently used, followed by materialist (access to health resources) and psychosocial (stress pathways) theories. Most studies used theories as post hoc explanations for their findings or for study rationale. Supportive evidence was found for the role of material, behavioural and life course theories in explaining the relationship between social inequalities and multimorbidity.

CONCLUSION

Given the widely reported social inequalities in multimorbidity and its increasing public health burden, there is a critical gap in evidence on pathways from socioeconomic disadvantage to multimorbidity. Generating evidence of these pathways will guide the development of intervention and public policies to prevent multimorbidity among people living in social disadvantage. Material, behavioural and life course pathways can be targeted to reduce the negative effect of low socioeconomic position on multimorbidity.

摘要

目的

记录用于解释社会经济劣势与多种疾病之间关系的社会流行病学理论。

设计

范围综述。

方法

制定了搜索策略,并将其应用于多个电子数据库,包括 Medline、Embase、PsychInfo、Web of Science、Scielo、Applied Social Sciences、ERIC、Humanities Index 和 Sociological Abstracts。在选择研究后,使用数据图表计划提取数据。最后一次搜索是在 2021 年 9 月 28 日进行的。提取的数据包括:研究设计、国家、人口亚组、社会经济不平等衡量标准、多种疾病评估以及社会经济变量与多种疾病之间关联的结论。纳入的研究还进一步评估了其对理论的使用、使用的理论类型和应用背景。最后,我们进行了元叙述综合以总结结果。

结果

共有 64 项研究纳入综述。其中,33 篇论文将理论作为解释社会经济地位与多种疾病之间关联的依据。在这一组中,有 16 项明确指出了这些理论,有 5 项至少测试了一项理论。行为理论(健康行为)是最常使用的理论,其次是物质主义(获取健康资源)和心理社会(压力途径)理论。大多数研究将理论作为对其发现或研究原理的事后解释。支持物质、行为和生命历程理论在解释社会不平等与多种疾病之间关系方面发挥作用的证据。

结论

鉴于多种疾病的社会不平等现象普遍存在,且其对公共卫生的负担日益加重,关于社会经济劣势向多种疾病发展的途径方面,证据存在严重不足。这些途径的证据将指导制定干预和公共政策,以预防处于社会劣势的人群发生多种疾病。可以针对物质、行为和生命历程途径来减少社会经济地位低下对多种疾病的负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f041/8882654/7fe0a82ba9cf/bmjopen-2021-055264f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验