• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国用户在使用 Twitter、Instagram 和 Facebook 时的幸福感的跨平台差异和亚组差异。

Cross-platform- and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 28;12(1):3271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07219-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-07219-y
PMID:35228639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8885821/
Abstract

Spatial aggregates of survey and web search data make it possible to identify the heterogeneous well-being effects of social media platforms. This study reports evidence from different sources of longitudinal data that suggests that the well-being effects of social media differ across platforms and population groups. The well-being effects of frequent social media visits are consistently positive for Facebook but negative for Instagram. Group-level analyses suggest that the positive well-being effects are experienced mainly by white, high-income populations at both the individual and the county level, while the adverse effects of Instagram use are observed on younger and Black populations. The findings are corroborated when geocoded web search data from Google is used and when self-reports from surveys are used in place of region-level aggregates. Greater Instagram use in regions is also linked to higher depression diagnoses across most sociodemographic groups.

摘要

调查和网络搜索数据的空间聚合使得识别社交媒体平台对幸福感的异质影响成为可能。本研究报告了来自不同纵向数据来源的证据,表明社交媒体对幸福感的影响因平台和人群群体而异。频繁访问社交媒体对 Facebook 的幸福感影响是积极的,但对 Instagram 则是消极的。群体层面的分析表明,积极的幸福感主要由个人和县级的白人、高收入人群体验到,而 Instagram 的使用对年轻人和黑人人口则产生不利影响。当使用谷歌地理编码的网络搜索数据以及用调查中的自我报告代替地区级聚合时,这些发现得到了证实。在大多数社会人口群体中,地区内更多的 Instagram 使用也与更高的抑郁诊断率有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b7/8885821/c8bee794ab20/41598_2022_7219_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b7/8885821/2be8c050e591/41598_2022_7219_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b7/8885821/3a89fc45a307/41598_2022_7219_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b7/8885821/564e9d193654/41598_2022_7219_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b7/8885821/c8bee794ab20/41598_2022_7219_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b7/8885821/2be8c050e591/41598_2022_7219_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b7/8885821/3a89fc45a307/41598_2022_7219_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b7/8885821/564e9d193654/41598_2022_7219_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02b7/8885821/c8bee794ab20/41598_2022_7219_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-platform- and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook in the United States.美国用户在使用 Twitter、Instagram 和 Facebook 时的幸福感的跨平台差异和亚组差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 28;12(1):3271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07219-y.
2
A Systematic review of the validity of screening depression through Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat.通过 Facebook、Twitter、Instagram 和 Snapchat 筛查抑郁的有效性的系统评价
J Affect Disord. 2021 May 1;286:360-369. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.091. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
Youth Study Recruitment Using Paid Advertising on Instagram, Snapchat, and Facebook: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.利用Instagram、Snapchat和Facebook上的付费广告招募青年研究对象:横断面调查研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Oct 9;5(4):e14080. doi: 10.2196/14080.
4
Otolaryngology Residency Program Rankings and Social Media Usage: A Longitudinal Analysis.耳鼻喉科学住院医师培训计划排名与社交媒体使用:一项纵向分析。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Nov;131(11):2455-2460. doi: 10.1002/lary.29621. Epub 2021 May 17.
5
Social Media Evaluation of Seasonal and Geographic Trends of Corneal Ulcers in the United States.美国角膜溃疡季节性和地理趋势的社交媒体评估
Eye Contact Lens. 2023 Jan 1;49(1):25-29. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000943. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
6
Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature.社交媒体上的医疗健康相关错误信息:科学文献的文献计量研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 25;24(1):e28152. doi: 10.2196/28152.
7
Social media use by shoulder and elbow surgeons increases the number of ratings on physician review websites.肩肘外科医生使用社交媒体会增加医生评价网站上的评分数量。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Dec;30(12):e713-e723. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
8
Updating 'Stories' on social media and its relationships to contextual age and narcissism: A tale of three platforms - WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook.在社交媒体上更新“动态”及其与情境年龄和自恋的关系:关于三个平台——WhatsApp、Instagram 和 Facebook 的故事
Heliyon. 2022 May 14;8(5):e09412. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09412. eCollection 2022 May.
9
An assessment of social media usage by dermatology residency programs.皮肤科住院医师培训项目对社交媒体使用情况的评估。
Dermatol Online J. 2019 Jan 15;25(1):13030/qt5v62b42z.
10
Factors Engaging Users of Diabetes Social Media Channels on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram: Observational Study.社交媒体在糖尿病管理中的应用:基于 Facebook、Twitter 和 Instagram 的用户参与因素观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e21204. doi: 10.2196/21204.

引用本文的文献

1
Breathing together: A global hashtag analysis of #LungHealth on platform X (formerly Twitter).共同呼吸:对平台X(原推特)上#肺部健康#话题的全球标签分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 16;11:20552076251335717. doi: 10.1177/20552076251335717. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Media Use and Mental Health and Well-Being Among Adolescents - A Scoping Review.青少年社交媒体使用与心理健康和幸福感——一项范围综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 14;11:1949. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01949. eCollection 2020.
2
Estimating geographic subjective well-being from Twitter: A comparison of dictionary and data-driven language methods.基于 Twitter 数据估算地理位置的主观幸福感:词典方法和数据驱动语言方法的比较
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 12;117(19):10165-10171. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906364117. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
3
Underestimating digital media harm.
低估数字媒体的危害。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Apr;4(4):346-348. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0839-4. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
4
Race Matters: Income Shares, Income Inequality, and Income Mobility for All U.S. Races.种族问题:美国所有种族的收入份额、收入不平等和收入流动性。
Demography. 2019 Jun;56(3):999-1021. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00773-7.
5
The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use.青少年福祉与数字技术使用之间的关系。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;3(2):173-182. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
6
Screens, Teens, and Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From Three Time-Use-Diary Studies.屏幕、青少年和心理健康:来自三项时间使用日记研究的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2019 May;30(5):682-696. doi: 10.1177/0956797619830329. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
7
Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp.网络情感表达规范:脸书、推特、照片墙和瓦次普的比较
New Media Soc. 2018 May;20(5):1813-1831. doi: 10.1177/1461444817707349. Epub 2017 May 23.
8
Facebook use and negative body image among U.S. college women.美国大学女生使用脸书与负面身体形象
Women Health. 2017 Feb;57(2):249-267. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2016.1159268. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
9
Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being.超越金钱:走向幸福经济。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004 Jul;5(1):1-31. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x. Epub 2004 Jul 1.
10
Instagram #instasad?: exploring associations among instagram use, depressive symptoms, negative social comparison, and strangers followed.照片墙(Instagram)#因照片墙而悲伤?:探究照片墙使用、抑郁症状、负面社会比较以及关注陌生人之间的关联。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 May;18(5):247-52. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0560.