Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Prev Med. 2022 Apr;157:107005. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107005. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
Vaccine uptake variation across demographic groups remains a public health barrier to overcome the coronavirus pandemic despite substantial evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against severe illness and death. Generational cohorts differ in their experience with historical and public health events, which may contribute to variation in beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. Nationally representative longitudinal data (December 20, 2020 to July 23, 2021) from the Understanding America Study (UAS) COVID-19 tracking survey (N = 7279) and multilevel logistic regression were used to investigate whether generational cohorts differ in COVID-19 vaccine beliefs. Regression models adjusted for wave, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, political affiliation, and trusted source of information about COVID-19. Birth-year cutoffs define the generational cohorts: Silent (1945 and earlier), Boomer (1946-1964), Gen X (1965-1980), Millennial (1981-1996), and Gen Z (1997-2012). Compared to Boomers, Silents had a lower likelihood of believing that COVID-19 vaccines have many known harmful side effects (OR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.35-0.74) and that they may lead to illness and death (OR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.37-0.77). Compared to Boomers, Silents had a higher likelihood of believing that the vaccines provide important benefits to society (OR = 2.27, 95%CI = 1.34-3.86) and that they are useful and effective (OR = 1.97, 95%CI = 1.17-3.30). Results for Gen Z are similar to those reported for Silents. Beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines markedly differ across generations. This is consistent with the idea of generational imprinting-the idea that some beliefs may be resistant to change through adulthood. Policy strategies other than vaccine education may be needed to overcome this pandemic and future public health challenges.
尽管有大量证据表明 COVID-19 疫苗可有效预防重症和死亡,但疫苗在不同人群中的接种率差异仍然是公共卫生面临的一个障碍。不同世代的人在历史和公共卫生事件方面的经历不同,这可能导致他们对 COVID-19 疫苗的看法存在差异。本研究使用了来自“理解美国研究(UAS)”COVID-19 追踪调查的全国代表性纵向数据(2020 年 12 月 20 日至 2021 年 7 月 23 日)(N=7279)和多层次逻辑回归来研究不同世代的人对 COVID-19 疫苗的看法是否存在差异。回归模型调整了波次、社会经济和人口统计学特征、政治派别以及有关 COVID-19 的可信信息来源。出生年份的截止值定义了世代群体:沉默的一代(1945 年及以前出生)、婴儿潮一代(1946-1964 年出生)、X 世代(1965-1980 年出生)、千禧一代(1981-1996 年出生)和 Z 世代(1997-2012 年出生)。与婴儿潮一代相比,沉默的一代认为 COVID-19 疫苗有许多已知的有害副作用(OR=0.52,95%CI=0.35-0.74)和可能导致疾病和死亡(OR=0.53,95%CI=0.37-0.77)的可能性较低。与婴儿潮一代相比,沉默的一代认为疫苗对社会有重要益处(OR=2.27,95%CI=1.34-3.86)和有用有效(OR=1.97,95%CI=1.17-3.30)的可能性更高。Z 世代的结果与沉默一代的结果相似。不同世代的人对 COVID-19 疫苗的看法存在显著差异。这与世代印记的观点一致,即某些信念可能在成年后难以改变。除了疫苗教育之外,可能还需要其他政策策略来克服这一流行病和未来的公共卫生挑战。