• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土壤氮处理改变了不同农场生态位的微生物群落网络。

Soil Nitrogen Treatment Alters Microbiome Networks Across Farm Niches.

作者信息

Wang XinYue, Reilly Kerri, Heathcott Rosemary, Biswas Ambarish, Johnson Linda J, Teasdale Suliana, Grelet Gwen-Aëlle, Podolyan Anastasija, Gregorini Pablo, Attwood Graeme T, Palevich Nikola, Morales Sergio E

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

AgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 14;12:786156. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.786156. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2021.786156
PMID:35237240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8882991/
Abstract

Agriculture is fundamental for food production, and microbiomes support agriculture through multiple essential ecosystem services. Despite the importance of individual (i.e., niche specific) agricultural microbiomes, microbiome interactions across niches are not well-understood. To observe the linkages between nearby agricultural microbiomes, multiple approaches (16S, 18S, and ITS) were used to inspect a broad coverage of niche microbiomes. Here we examined agricultural microbiome responses to 3 different nitrogen treatments (0, 150, and 300 kg/ha/yr) in soil and tracked linked responses in other neighbouring farm niches (rumen, faecal, white clover leaf, white clover root, rye grass leaf, and rye grass root). Nitrogen treatment had little impact on microbiome structure or composition across niches, but drastically reduced the microbiome network connectivity in soil. Networks of 16S microbiomes were the most sensitive to nitrogen treatment across amplicons, where ITS microbiome networks were the least responsive. Nitrogen enrichment in soil altered soil and the neighbouring microbiome networks, supporting our hypotheses that nitrogen treatment in soil altered microbiomes in soil and in nearby niches. This suggested that agricultural microbiomes across farm niches are ecologically interactive. Therefore, knock-on effects on neighbouring niches should be considered when management is applied to a single agricultural niche.

摘要

农业是粮食生产的基础,微生物群落通过多种重要的生态系统服务来支持农业。尽管单个(即特定生态位)农业微生物群落很重要,但不同生态位之间的微生物群落相互作用却尚未得到充分理解。为了观察附近农业微生物群落之间的联系,我们使用了多种方法(16S、18S和ITS)来全面检测生态位微生物群落。在此,我们研究了土壤中农业微生物群落对3种不同氮处理(0、150和300千克/公顷/年)的响应,并追踪了其他相邻农场生态位(瘤胃、粪便、白三叶草叶、白三叶草根、黑麦草叶和黑麦草)中的相关响应。氮处理对不同生态位的微生物群落结构或组成影响不大,但显著降低了土壤中微生物群落网络的连通性。在所有扩增子中,16S微生物群落网络对氮处理最为敏感,而ITS微生物群落网络的响应最小。土壤中的氮富集改变了土壤和相邻的微生物群落网络,支持了我们的假设,即土壤中的氮处理改变了土壤和附近生态位中的微生物群落。这表明不同农场生态位的农业微生物群落具有生态交互作用。因此,当对单一农业生态位进行管理时,应考虑对相邻生态位的连锁效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52bb/8882991/9597b7e29403/fmicb-12-786156-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52bb/8882991/dd45e982852a/fmicb-12-786156-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52bb/8882991/aed067ef1838/fmicb-12-786156-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52bb/8882991/cc93744a901a/fmicb-12-786156-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52bb/8882991/9597b7e29403/fmicb-12-786156-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52bb/8882991/dd45e982852a/fmicb-12-786156-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52bb/8882991/aed067ef1838/fmicb-12-786156-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52bb/8882991/cc93744a901a/fmicb-12-786156-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52bb/8882991/9597b7e29403/fmicb-12-786156-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Soil Nitrogen Treatment Alters Microbiome Networks Across Farm Niches.土壤氮处理改变了不同农场生态位的微生物群落网络。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 14;12:786156. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.786156. eCollection 2021.
2
Agricultural Soil Management Practices Differentially Shape the Bacterial and Fungal Microbiome of .农业土壤管理实践对……的细菌和真菌微生物群落有不同的塑造作用。 (你提供的原文似乎不完整,句末缺少具体内容)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Mar 1;87(5). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02345-20. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
3
Plant domestication shapes rhizosphere microbiome assembly and metabolic functions.植物驯化塑造根际微生物组组装和代谢功能。
Microbiome. 2023 Mar 31;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01513-1.
4
Plant Microbiomes: Do Different Preservation Approaches and Primer Sets Alter Our Capacity to Assess Microbial Diversity and Community Composition?植物微生物组:不同的保存方法和引物组会改变我们评估微生物多样性和群落组成的能力吗?
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jul 3;11:993. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00993. eCollection 2020.
5
Structural variability and niche differentiation in the rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial microbiome of field-grown poplar trees.田间生长的杨树根际和根内细菌微生物组的结构变异性和生态位分化。
Microbiome. 2017 Feb 23;5(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0241-2.
6
Protist communities are more sensitive to nitrogen fertilization than other microorganisms in diverse agricultural soils.在不同农业土壤中,与其他微生物相比,原生生物群落对氮施肥更为敏感。
Microbiome. 2019 Feb 27;7(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0647-0.
7
Host selection shapes crop microbiome assembly and network complexity.宿主选择塑造了作物微生物群落的组装和网络复杂性。
New Phytol. 2021 Jan;229(2):1091-1104. doi: 10.1111/nph.16890. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
8
Fire alters plant microbiome assembly patterns: integrating the plant and soil microbial response to disturbance.火改变了植物微生物组的组装模式:整合植物和土壤微生物对干扰的响应。
New Phytol. 2021 Jun;230(6):2433-2446. doi: 10.1111/nph.17248. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
9
The response of microbiome assembly within different niches across four stages to the cultivation of glyphosate-tolerant and conventional soybean varieties.四个阶段中不同生态位内微生物群落组装对耐草甘膦大豆品种和常规大豆品种种植的响应。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Sep 25;15:1439735. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1439735. eCollection 2024.
10
Structure, composition and metagenomic profile of soil microbiomes associated to agricultural land use and tillage systems in Argentine Pampas.阿根廷潘帕斯地区与农业土地利用和耕作系统相关的土壤微生物群落的结构、组成和宏基因组概况。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099949. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
High-throughput DNA extraction and cost-effective miniaturized metagenome and amplicon library preparation of soil samples for DNA sequencing.高通量 DNA 提取以及经济高效的土壤样本小型化宏基因组和扩增子文库制备,用于 DNA 测序。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 4;19(4):e0301446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301446. eCollection 2024.
2
The soil microbiome of Lolium perenne L. depends on host genotype, is modified by nitrogen level and varies across season.黑麦草的土壤微生物组依赖于宿主基因型,受氮水平的调节,并随季节而变化。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 8;14(1):5767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56353-2.
3
Analysis of Bacterial Microbiota of Aerated Compost Teas and Effect on Tomato Growth.

本文引用的文献

1
Sward type alters the relative abundance of members of the rumen microbial ecosystem in dairy cows.饲草类型改变奶牛瘤胃微生物生态系统成员的相对丰度。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 9;10(1):9317. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66028-3.
2
Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies drive topsoil microbiome structure and function.植物养分获取策略驱动表土微生物群落的结构和功能。
New Phytol. 2020 Aug;227(4):1189-1199. doi: 10.1111/nph.16598. Epub 2020 May 6.
3
Plant-microbe networks in soil are weakened by century-long use of inorganic fertilizers.土壤中的植物-微生物网络因百年来使用无机肥料而变得脆弱。
好的,我将把“Analysis of Bacterial Microbiota of Aerated Compost Teas and Effect on Tomato Growth.”翻译为简体中文,以下是译文: 通气堆肥茶中细菌微生物群分析及其对番茄生长的影响。
Microb Ecol. 2023 Aug;86(2):959-972. doi: 10.1007/s00248-022-02156-9. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
Microb Biotechnol. 2019 Nov;12(6):1464-1475. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13487. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
4
Rumen and Fecal Microbial Community Structure of Holstein and Jersey Dairy Cows as Affected by Breed, Diet, and Residual Feed Intake.品种、日粮和剩余采食量对荷斯坦奶牛和娟姗奶牛瘤胃及粪便微生物群落结构的影响
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jul 29;9(8):498. doi: 10.3390/ani9080498.
5
Agricultural intensification reduces microbial network complexity and the abundance of keystone taxa in roots.农业集约化降低了根系微生物网络的复杂性和关键类群的丰度。
ISME J. 2019 Jul;13(7):1722-1736. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0383-2. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
6
Protist communities are more sensitive to nitrogen fertilization than other microorganisms in diverse agricultural soils.在不同农业土壤中,与其他微生物相比,原生生物群落对氮施肥更为敏感。
Microbiome. 2019 Feb 27;7(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0647-0.
7
Rumen microbial responses to supplemental nitrate. II. Potential interactions with live yeast culture on the prokaryotic community and methanogenesis in continuous culture.瘤胃微生物对补充硝酸盐的反应。二、与连续培养中原核群落和产甲烷作用的活性酵母培养物的潜在相互作用。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Mar;102(3):2217-2231. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15826. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
8
The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications.UNITE 数据库用于真菌的分子鉴定:处理暗类群和并行的分类学分类。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D259-D264. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1022.
9
Evaluation of Microbial Communities Associated With the Liquid and Solid Phases of the Rumen of Cattle Offered a Diet of Perennial Ryegrass or White Clover.以多年生黑麦草或白三叶为日粮的奶牛瘤胃液相和固相相关微生物群落的评估
Front Microbiol. 2018 Oct 8;9:2389. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02389. eCollection 2018.
10
Stability criteria for complex microbial communities.复杂微生物群落的稳定性标准。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 30;9(1):2970. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05308-z.