Wang XinYue, Reilly Kerri, Heathcott Rosemary, Biswas Ambarish, Johnson Linda J, Teasdale Suliana, Grelet Gwen-Aëlle, Podolyan Anastasija, Gregorini Pablo, Attwood Graeme T, Palevich Nikola, Morales Sergio E
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
AgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 14;12:786156. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.786156. eCollection 2021.
Agriculture is fundamental for food production, and microbiomes support agriculture through multiple essential ecosystem services. Despite the importance of individual (i.e., niche specific) agricultural microbiomes, microbiome interactions across niches are not well-understood. To observe the linkages between nearby agricultural microbiomes, multiple approaches (16S, 18S, and ITS) were used to inspect a broad coverage of niche microbiomes. Here we examined agricultural microbiome responses to 3 different nitrogen treatments (0, 150, and 300 kg/ha/yr) in soil and tracked linked responses in other neighbouring farm niches (rumen, faecal, white clover leaf, white clover root, rye grass leaf, and rye grass root). Nitrogen treatment had little impact on microbiome structure or composition across niches, but drastically reduced the microbiome network connectivity in soil. Networks of 16S microbiomes were the most sensitive to nitrogen treatment across amplicons, where ITS microbiome networks were the least responsive. Nitrogen enrichment in soil altered soil and the neighbouring microbiome networks, supporting our hypotheses that nitrogen treatment in soil altered microbiomes in soil and in nearby niches. This suggested that agricultural microbiomes across farm niches are ecologically interactive. Therefore, knock-on effects on neighbouring niches should be considered when management is applied to a single agricultural niche.
农业是粮食生产的基础,微生物群落通过多种重要的生态系统服务来支持农业。尽管单个(即特定生态位)农业微生物群落很重要,但不同生态位之间的微生物群落相互作用却尚未得到充分理解。为了观察附近农业微生物群落之间的联系,我们使用了多种方法(16S、18S和ITS)来全面检测生态位微生物群落。在此,我们研究了土壤中农业微生物群落对3种不同氮处理(0、150和300千克/公顷/年)的响应,并追踪了其他相邻农场生态位(瘤胃、粪便、白三叶草叶、白三叶草根、黑麦草叶和黑麦草)中的相关响应。氮处理对不同生态位的微生物群落结构或组成影响不大,但显著降低了土壤中微生物群落网络的连通性。在所有扩增子中,16S微生物群落网络对氮处理最为敏感,而ITS微生物群落网络的响应最小。土壤中的氮富集改变了土壤和相邻的微生物群落网络,支持了我们的假设,即土壤中的氮处理改变了土壤和附近生态位中的微生物群落。这表明不同农场生态位的农业微生物群落具有生态交互作用。因此,当对单一农业生态位进行管理时,应考虑对相邻生态位的连锁效应。