Thomason Nicole, Monlezun Dominique J, Javaid Awad, Filipescu Alexandru, Koutroumpakis Efstratios, Shobayo Fisayomi, Kim Peter, Lopez-Mattei Juan, Cilingiroglu Mehmet, Iliescu Gloria, Marmagkiolis Kostas, Ramirez Pedro T, Iliescu Cezar
Division of Cardiology, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 14;8:793877. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.793877. eCollection 2021.
Despite the growing number of patients with both coronary artery disease and gynecological cancer, there are no nationally representative studies of mortality and cost effectiveness for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and this cancer type.
Backward propagation neural network machine learning supported and propensity score adjusted multivariable regression was conducted for the above outcomes in this case-control study of the 2016 National Inpatient Sample (NIS), the United States' largest all-payer hospitalized dataset. Regression models were fully adjusted for age, race, income, geographic region, cancer metastases, mortality risk, and the likelihood of undergoing PCI (and also with length of stay [LOS] for cost). Analyses were also adjusted for the complex survey design to produce nationally representative estimates. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-based cost effectiveness ratio (CER) analysis was performed.
Of the 30,195,722 hospitalized patients meeting criteria, 1.27% had gynecological cancer of whom 0.02% underwent PCI including 0.04% with metastases. In propensity score adjusted regression among all patients, the interaction of PCI and gynecological cancer (vs. not having PCI) significantly reduced mortality (OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.36-0.77; = 0.001) while increasing LOS (Beta 1.16 days, 95%CI 0.57-1.75; < 0.001) and total cost (Beta $31,035.46, 95%CI 26758.86-35312.06; < 0.001). Among gynecological cancer patients, mortality was significantly reduced by PCI (OR 0.58, 95%CI 0.39-0.85; = 0.006) and being in East North Central, West North Central, South Atlantic, and Mountain regions (all < 0.03) compared to New England. PCI reduced mortality but not significantly for metastatic patients (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.32-1.71; = 0.481). Eighteen extra gynecological cancer patients' lives were saved with PCI for a net national cost of $3.18 billion and a CER of $176.50 million per averted death.
This large propensity score analysis suggests that PCI may cost inefficiently reduce mortality for gynecological cancer patients, amid income and geographic disparities in outcomes.
尽管同时患有冠状动脉疾病和妇科癌症的患者数量不断增加,但尚无关于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与这种癌症类型的死亡率和成本效益的全国代表性研究。
在这项基于2016年全国住院患者样本(NIS)的病例对照研究中,采用反向传播神经网络机器学习支持和倾向评分调整的多变量回归分析上述结果,NIS是美国最大的全支付者住院数据集。回归模型对年龄、种族、收入、地理区域、癌症转移、死亡风险以及接受PCI的可能性(成本分析时还包括住院时间[LOS])进行了全面调整。分析还针对复杂的调查设计进行了调整,以得出具有全国代表性的估计值。进行了基于疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的成本效益比(CER)分析。
在符合标准的30,195,722名住院患者中,1.27%患有妇科癌症,其中0.02%接受了PCI,包括0.04%有转移的患者。在所有患者的倾向评分调整回归中,PCI与妇科癌症(与未接受PCI相比)的相互作用显著降低了死亡率(OR 0.53,95%CI 0.36 - 0.77;P = 0.001),同时增加了住院时间(β 1.16天,95%CI 0.57 - 1.75;P < 0.001)和总成本(β 31,035.46美元,95%CI 26758.86 - 35312.06;P < 0.001)。在妇科癌症患者中,与新英格兰地区相比,PCI显著降低了死亡率(OR 0.58,95%CI 0.39 - 0.85;P = 0.006),且在东中北部、西中北部、南大西洋和山区的患者死亡率也显著降低(均P < 0.03)。PCI降低了死亡率,但对转移患者不显著(OR 0.74,95%CI 0.32 - 1.71;P = 0.481)。PCI挽救了18名额外的妇科癌症患者生命,全国净成本为31.8亿美元,每避免一例死亡的CER为1.765亿美元。
这项大型倾向评分分析表明,在结果存在收入和地理差异的情况下,PCI可能以低效的成本降低妇科癌症患者的死亡率。