Fujii Mai, Hayashi Masayuki, Teng Cheong Lieng
Doshisha University, Center for Baby Science - Kizugawa - Kyoto - Japan.
Khon Kaen University, Faculty of Public Health - Khon Kaen - Muang - Thailand.
Sleep Sci. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(Spec 1):128-134. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20220011.
The purpose of this study was to compare the duration of sleep and nap patterns between children in private kindergartens and those in a -transit facility, in Malaysia.
The sleep duration of children aged 3-6, who attended either a kindergarten or a childcare transit facility (-transit in Malay) was investigated. Observational sleeping records were maintained for 24 hours, over 14 consecutive days. A self-administered questionnaire for caregivers investigated the children's lifestyles. Naps were optional at kindergartens but mandatory at the -transit.
Of 35 participating children, data from 33 were analyzed. All respondents belonged to the Malay ethnicity, with 16 boys (48.5%) and 17 girls (51.5%). The average age of the children was 5.4 years; 11 of them were from kindergartens and 22 from a -transit. The children slept longer and woke up later on weekends than on weekdays. There was a significant difference in the naptaking rate between the two groups; it was 100% in the -transit, and 30% in the kindergartens during weekdays. However, on weekends, 19 of 22 - transit children did not nap on any of the days (86.4%). The kindergarten group's naps showed no outstanding differences between weekdays and weekends. Concerning the bedtime and wake-up times, no differences were found between the two groups.
During weekdays, all children in the -transit took naps, whereas one-third of them did in the kindergartens. Larger study is needed to assess how this mandatory napping style affects children's lifestyle and development.
本研究旨在比较马来西亚私立幼儿园儿童与临时照料机构儿童的睡眠时间和午睡模式。
对3至6岁就读于幼儿园或临时照料机构(马来语为“transit”)的儿童的睡眠时间进行调查。连续14天记录24小时的观察睡眠记录。通过一份供照料者自行填写的问卷来调查儿童的生活方式。幼儿园午睡为非强制性,而临时照料机构午睡是强制性的。
在35名参与研究的儿童中,分析了33名儿童的数据。所有受访者均为马来族,其中16名男孩(48.5%),17名女孩(51.5%)。儿童的平均年龄为5.4岁;其中11名来自幼儿园,22名来自临时照料机构。儿童周末的睡眠时间比工作日更长,起床时间也更晚。两组的午睡率存在显著差异;工作日期间,临时照料机构的午睡率为100%,幼儿园为30%。然而,在周末,22名临时照料机构儿童中有19名在任何一天都不午睡(86.4%)。幼儿园组的午睡在工作日和周末之间没有显著差异。关于就寝时间和起床时间,两组之间没有发现差异。
在工作日,临时照料机构的所有儿童都午睡,而幼儿园只有三分之一的儿童午睡。需要进行更大规模的研究来评估这种强制性午睡方式如何影响儿童的生活方式和发育。