Department of Psychology, University of Regina, SK, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Regina, SK, Canada.
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Apr;87:102554. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102554. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
No studies have examined whether levels of COVID stress vary across anxiety-related disorders. Likewise, no studies have assessed structural invariance of the COVID Stress Scales (CSS) across clinical diagnoses. We sought to address these issues in the present study. Given the dynamic nature of pandemics, we also assessed whether COVID stress changed from the first to third wave in those with clinical diagnoses and those with no mental health conditions.
Data were collected during COVID-19 from two independent samples of adults assessed about a year apart (early-mid in 2020, N = 6854; and early-mid 2021, N = 5812) recruited from Canada and the United States through an online survey. Participants provided demographic information, indicated the presence of current (i.e., past-year) anxiety-related or mood disorder, and completed the CSS.
The five CSS were reliable (internally consistent), and the five-factor structure was stable across samples. Scores tended to be highest in people with anxiety-related or mood disorders, particularly panic disorder. As expected, scores fluctuated over time, being higher during the early phases of the pandemic when threat was greatest and lower during the later phases, when vaccines were deployed and the COVID-19 threat was reduced.
The findings add to the growing number of studies supporting the psychometric properties of the CSS. The results encourage further investigations into the utility of the scales, such as their ability to detect treatment-related changes in COVID-19-related distress. The scales also show promise for studies of future pandemics or outbreaks because the CSS can be modified, with minor wording changes, to assess distress associated with all kinds of disease outbreaks.
目前尚无研究探讨 COVID 相关压力在焦虑相关障碍患者中是否存在差异。同样,也没有研究评估 COVID 应激量表(CSS)在临床诊断中的结构不变性。本研究旨在解决这些问题。鉴于大流行的动态性质,我们还评估了在有临床诊断和无心理健康状况的患者中,COVID 压力是否会从第一波到第三波发生变化。
从加拿大和美国通过在线调查招募了两个独立的成年人样本,分别在 COVID-19 大流行期间于 2020 年中至 2021 年中相隔一年左右的时间收集数据(早期-中期,N=6854;早期-中期,N=5812)。参与者提供人口统计学信息,表明是否存在当前(即过去一年)的焦虑相关或情绪障碍,并完成了 CSS。
五个 CSS 的信度(内部一致性)良好,且五因素结构在两个样本中都很稳定。在有焦虑相关或情绪障碍的人群中,得分往往最高,尤其是恐慌症。正如预期的那样,分数随时间波动,在大流行早期威胁最大时较高,而在后期疫苗接种和 COVID-19 威胁降低时较低。
这些发现增加了越来越多支持 CSS 心理测量特性的研究。结果鼓励进一步研究这些量表的效用,例如它们检测 COVID-19 相关压力治疗相关变化的能力。由于 CSS 可以进行修改,只需进行轻微的措辞更改,即可评估与各种疾病爆发相关的压力,因此该量表也为未来大流行或爆发的研究提供了希望。