Kurosaka Kenji, Tsukada Sachiyuki, Seino Daisuke, Morooka Takatoshi, Nakayama Hiroshi, Yoshiya Shinichi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokusuikai Kinen Hospital, Mito, Ibaraki, Japan.
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr;31(4):913-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.030. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
Although both local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) are common analgesic modalities for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), we are aware of no parallel-group, randomized controlled trial that has solely compared the efficacy of LIA and continuous FNB.
We conducted a prospective, 2-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial involving patients scheduled for TKA. A total of 45 patients were randomly assigned to either the LIA or the continuous FNB group. Except for the analgesic modality, perioperative managements were identical in both groups. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score at rest 1 day after surgery, measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale.
Patients in the LIA group had a significantly lower visual analog scale score at rest 1 day after surgery than those in the continuous FNB group (34 ± 10 vs 42 ± 13 mm; P = .028). The opioid consumption during the initial 24 hours was significantly lower in the LIA group (12 ± 4 vs 16 ± 7 mg; P = .031). There were no differences in the rate of complications between the groups.
LIA was associated with better pain relief with a comparable complications rate for patients undergoing TKA than FNB. We recommend LIA for pain relief after TKA.
尽管局部浸润镇痛(LIA)和连续股神经阻滞(FNB)都是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后常用的镇痛方式,但我们尚未发现有平行组随机对照试验专门比较过LIA和连续FNB的疗效。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、双臂、平行组随机对照试验,纳入计划接受TKA的患者。总共45例患者被随机分配至LIA组或连续FNB组。除镇痛方式外,两组围手术期管理相同。主要结局是术后1天静息时的疼痛评分,采用100毫米视觉模拟量表进行测量。
LIA组患者术后1天静息时的视觉模拟量表评分显著低于连续FNB组(34±10 vs 42±13毫米;P = .028)。LIA组最初24小时内的阿片类药物消耗量显著更低(12±4 vs 16±7毫克;P = .031)。两组间并发症发生率无差异。
对于接受TKA的患者,LIA与更好的疼痛缓解相关,且并发症发生率与FNB相当。我们推荐LIA用于TKA后的疼痛缓解。