Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术后局部浸润镇痛与持续股神经阻滞在疼痛缓解方面的比较:一项随机对照试验

Local Infiltration Analgesia Versus Continuous Femoral Nerve Block in Pain Relief After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Kurosaka Kenji, Tsukada Sachiyuki, Seino Daisuke, Morooka Takatoshi, Nakayama Hiroshi, Yoshiya Shinichi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokusuikai Kinen Hospital, Mito, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr;31(4):913-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.030. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although both local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) are common analgesic modalities for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), we are aware of no parallel-group, randomized controlled trial that has solely compared the efficacy of LIA and continuous FNB.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, 2-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial involving patients scheduled for TKA. A total of 45 patients were randomly assigned to either the LIA or the continuous FNB group. Except for the analgesic modality, perioperative managements were identical in both groups. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score at rest 1 day after surgery, measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Patients in the LIA group had a significantly lower visual analog scale score at rest 1 day after surgery than those in the continuous FNB group (34 ± 10 vs 42 ± 13 mm; P = .028). The opioid consumption during the initial 24 hours was significantly lower in the LIA group (12 ± 4 vs 16 ± 7 mg; P = .031). There were no differences in the rate of complications between the groups.

CONCLUSION

LIA was associated with better pain relief with a comparable complications rate for patients undergoing TKA than FNB. We recommend LIA for pain relief after TKA.

摘要

背景

尽管局部浸润镇痛(LIA)和连续股神经阻滞(FNB)都是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后常用的镇痛方式,但我们尚未发现有平行组随机对照试验专门比较过LIA和连续FNB的疗效。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、双臂、平行组随机对照试验,纳入计划接受TKA的患者。总共45例患者被随机分配至LIA组或连续FNB组。除镇痛方式外,两组围手术期管理相同。主要结局是术后1天静息时的疼痛评分,采用100毫米视觉模拟量表进行测量。

结果

LIA组患者术后1天静息时的视觉模拟量表评分显著低于连续FNB组(34±10 vs 42±13毫米;P = .028)。LIA组最初24小时内的阿片类药物消耗量显著更低(12±4 vs 16±7毫克;P = .031)。两组间并发症发生率无差异。

结论

对于接受TKA的患者,LIA与更好的疼痛缓解相关,且并发症发生率与FNB相当。我们推荐LIA用于TKA后的疼痛缓解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验