López-Navarro Emilio, Al-Halabí Susana
Department of Psychology. University of Balearic Islands. Spain.
Department of Psychology. University of Oviedo. Spain.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2022 May-Aug;22(2):100298. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100298. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Cognitive Behavior Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is a recommended treatment for psychoses whose effect is mediated by coping. Mindfulness (MBI) have shown positive effects in psychosis. This study examines the hypothesis that combining CBTp+MBI could improve coping with day-to-day life in psychosis better than CBTp alone in people attending a public community rehabilitation center.
Fifty-six outpatients were recruited and randomly allocated either to CBTp or CBTp+MBI. Measures comprised PANSS interview and COPE Inventory. Data were analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA and RCI calculation.
There were no statistical differences between groups at pre-treatment. Significant statistical differences were found for the interaction Treatment x Time in Mental disengagement ( = 5.65, = .021, = .102), Acceptance ( = 7.69, = .008, = .133), and Suppressing competing activities ( = 4.62, = .037, = .085).
MBI promotes specific coping styles in people who experience psychosis that otherwise are not improved with CBTp. Only the MBI group improved acceptance of the presence of the stressor and reduced mental disengagement from the context. The intervention is feasible and effective for public healthcare settings.
背景/目的:针对精神病的认知行为疗法(CBTp)是一种推荐的治疗方法,其效果通过应对方式来介导。正念减压疗法(MBI)已在精神病治疗中显示出积极效果。本研究检验了这样一个假设:对于在公共社区康复中心接受治疗的患者,将CBTp与MBI相结合,在应对精神病患者的日常生活方面,比单独使用CBTp能取得更好的效果。
招募了56名门诊患者,并将他们随机分配到CBTp组或CBTp + MBI组。测量方法包括阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)访谈及应对方式量表(COPE Inventory)。使用重复测量方差分析和效应量计算(RCI)对数据进行分析。
治疗前两组之间无统计学差异。在心理超脱(F = 5.65,p = .021,η² = .102)、接受(F = 7.69,p = .008,η² = .133)和抑制竞争活动(F = 4.62,p = .037,η² = .085)方面,发现治疗×时间的交互作用存在显著统计学差异。
MBI可促进精神病患者形成特定的应对方式,而单独使用CBTp无法改善这些方式。只有MBI组提高了对应激源存在的接受程度,并减少了与情境的心理超脱。该干预措施在公共医疗环境中是可行且有效的。