• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防复发项目的使用强度及其与缓解期焦虑和抑郁患者症状严重程度的关系:前后对照研究

Usage Intensity of a Relapse Prevention Program and Its Relation to Symptom Severity in Remitted Patients With Anxiety and Depression: Pre-Post Study.

作者信息

Krijnen-de Bruin Esther, Muntingh Anna Dt, Bourguignon Evelien M, Hoogendoorn Adriaan, Maarsingh Otto R, van Balkom Anton Jlm, Batelaan Neeltje M, van Straten Annemieke, van Meijel Berno

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Mar 16;9(3):e25441. doi: 10.2196/25441.

DOI:10.2196/25441
PMID:35293876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8968549/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given that relapse is common in patients in remission from anxiety and depressive disorders, relapse prevention is needed in the maintenance phase. Although existing psychological relapse prevention interventions have proven to be effective, they are not explicitly based on patients' preferences. Hence, we developed a blended relapse prevention program based on patients' preferences, which was delivered in primary care practices by mental health professionals (MHPs). This program comprises contact with MHPs, completion of core and optional online modules (including a relapse prevention plan), and keeping a mood and anxiety diary in which patients can monitor their symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to provide insight into (1) usage intensity of the program (over time), (2) the course of symptoms during the 9 months of the study, and (3) the association between usage intensity and the course of symptoms.

METHODS

The Guided E-healTh for RElapse prevention in Anxiety and Depression (GET READY) program was guided by 54 MHPs working in primary care practices. Patients in remission from anxiety and depressive disorders were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including anxiety and depressive symptoms, were collected via questionnaires at baseline and after 3, 6, and 9 months. Log data were collected to assess the usage intensity of the program.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients participated in the study. Twenty-seven patients (23.9%) met the criteria for the minimal usage intensity measure. The core modules were used by ≥70% of the patients, while the optional modules were used by <40% of the patients. Usage decreased quickly over time. Anxiety and depressive symptoms remained stable across the total sample; a minority of 15% (12/79) of patients experienced a relapse in their anxiety symptoms, while 10% (8/79) experienced a relapse in their depressive symptoms. Generalized estimating equations analysis indicated a significant association between more frequent face-to-face contact with the MHPs and an increase in both anxiety symptoms (β=.84, 95% CI .39-1.29) and depressive symptoms (β=1.12, 95% CI 0.45-1.79). Diary entries and the number of completed modules were not significantly associated with the course of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the core modules of the GET READY program were used by most of the patients and all patients saw an MHP at least once, usage decreased quickly over time. Most patients remained stable while participating in the study. The significant association between the frequency of contact and the course of symptoms most likely indicates that those who received more support had more symptoms, and thus, it is questionable whether the support offered by the program was sufficient to prevent these patients from relapsing.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12888-019-2034-6.

摘要

背景

鉴于焦虑症和抑郁症缓解期患者复发情况常见,维持期需要预防复发。尽管现有的心理复发预防干预措施已被证明有效,但它们并非明确基于患者的偏好。因此,我们基于患者偏好开发了一个混合复发预防项目,该项目由心理健康专业人员(MHP)在初级保健机构实施。该项目包括与MHP接触、完成核心和可选在线模块(包括复发预防计划)以及记录情绪和焦虑日记,患者可在日记中监测自身症状。

目的

本研究的目的是深入了解(1)该项目的使用强度(随时间变化),(2)研究9个月期间症状的变化过程,以及(3)使用强度与症状变化过程之间的关联。

方法

焦虑和抑郁复发预防的引导式电子健康(GET READY)项目由在初级保健机构工作的54名MHP指导实施。纳入焦虑症和抑郁症缓解期患者。通过问卷调查在基线以及3、6和9个月后收集人口统计学和临床特征,包括焦虑和抑郁症状。收集日志数据以评估项目的使用强度。

结果

共有113名患者参与研究。27名患者(23.9%)达到最低使用强度测量标准。≥70%的患者使用了核心模块,而<40%的患者使用了可选模块。随着时间推移,使用量迅速下降。整个样本中焦虑和抑郁症状保持稳定;15%(12/79)的少数患者焦虑症状复发,10%(8/79)的患者抑郁症状复发。广义估计方程分析表明,与MHP更频繁的面对面接触与焦虑症状增加(β = 0.84,95%CI 0.39 - 1.29)和抑郁症状增加(β = 1.12,95%CI 0.45 - 1.79)之间存在显著关联。日记记录和完成的模块数量与症状变化过程无显著关联。

结论

尽管GET READY项目的核心模块被大多数患者使用,且所有患者至少与一名MHP见过一次面,但随着时间推移使用量迅速下降。大多数患者在参与研究期间保持稳定。接触频率与症状变化过程之间的显著关联很可能表明,获得更多支持的患者症状更多,因此,该项目提供的支持是否足以防止这些患者复发值得怀疑。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):RR2 - 10.1186/s12888 - 019 - 2034 - 6。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8968549/7483061a124d/mental_v9i3e25441_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8968549/a3e2385e0bdf/mental_v9i3e25441_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8968549/5d52a46686c8/mental_v9i3e25441_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8968549/7483061a124d/mental_v9i3e25441_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8968549/a3e2385e0bdf/mental_v9i3e25441_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8968549/5d52a46686c8/mental_v9i3e25441_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8968549/7483061a124d/mental_v9i3e25441_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Usage Intensity of a Relapse Prevention Program and Its Relation to Symptom Severity in Remitted Patients With Anxiety and Depression: Pre-Post Study.预防复发项目的使用强度及其与缓解期焦虑和抑郁患者症状严重程度的关系:前后对照研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Mar 16;9(3):e25441. doi: 10.2196/25441.
2
Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study.综合实践中焦虑和抑郁混合式预防复发项目的评估:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Feb 16;5(2):e23200. doi: 10.2196/23200.
3
The GET READY relapse prevention programme for anxiety and depression: a mixed-methods study protocol.《GET READY 复发预防计划用于焦虑和抑郁:一项混合方法研究方案》
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2034-6.
4
Breaking Open the Black Box: Isolating the Most Potent Features of a Web and Mobile Phone-Based Intervention for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress.打破黑箱:分离基于网络和手机的干预措施治疗抑郁、焦虑和压力的最有效特征。
JMIR Ment Health. 2015 Mar 4;2(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/mental.3573. eCollection 2015 Jan-Mar.
5
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of low-intensity psychological interventions for the secondary prevention of relapse after depression: a systematic review.低强度心理干预在预防抑郁复发中的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 May;16(28):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta16280.
6
Patient preferences for a guided self-help programme to prevent relapse in anxiety or depression: A discrete choice experiment.患者对预防焦虑或抑郁复发的引导自助计划的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219588. eCollection 2019.
7
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.针对成年癌症患者症状管理的电话干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2.
8
Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Major Depression and Anxiety Disorders: A Health Technology Assessment.互联网提供的针对重度抑郁症和焦虑症的认知行为疗法:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(6):1-199. eCollection 2019.
9
Exploring the Relationship Between Usage and Outcomes of an Internet-Based Intervention for Individuals With Depressive Symptoms: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Randomized Controlled Trial.探索基于互联网的抑郁症症状个体干预措施的使用情况与效果之间的关系:一项随机对照试验数据的二次分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 1;21(8):e12775. doi: 10.2196/12775.
10
An interdisciplinary multimodal integrative healthcare program for depressive and anxiety disorders.一项针对抑郁和焦虑症的跨学科多模式综合医疗保健计划。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 23;14:1113356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1113356. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a Blended Relapse Prevention Program for Anxiety and Depression in General Practice: Qualitative Study.综合实践中焦虑和抑郁混合式预防复发项目的评估:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Feb 16;5(2):e23200. doi: 10.2196/23200.
2
Patient preferences for a guided self-help programme to prevent relapse in anxiety or depression: A discrete choice experiment.患者对预防焦虑或抑郁复发的引导自助计划的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219588. eCollection 2019.
3
The GET READY relapse prevention programme for anxiety and depression: a mixed-methods study protocol.
《GET READY 复发预防计划用于焦虑和抑郁:一项混合方法研究方案》
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2034-6.
4
Internet- and mobile-based aftercare and relapse prevention in mental disorders: A systematic review and recommendations for future research.基于互联网和移动设备的精神障碍后续护理及复发预防:系统评价与未来研究建议
Internet Interv. 2018 Oct 24;14:1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.09.001. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
The Challenges of Improving Treatments for Depression.改善抑郁症治疗方法面临的挑战。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 25;320(24):2529-2530. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.17824.
6
Enduring effects of psychological treatments for anxiety disorders: meta-analysis of follow-up studies.焦虑障碍心理治疗的持久效果:随访研究的荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;212(6):333-338. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.49. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
Effectiveness of preventive cognitive therapy while tapering antidepressants versus maintenance antidepressant treatment versus their combination in prevention of depressive relapse or recurrence (DRD study): a three-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.逐渐减少抗抑郁药物用量时预防性认知疗法与维持性抗抑郁药物治疗及其联合使用在预防抑郁复发或再发方面的有效性(DRD研究):一项三组、多中心、随机对照试验
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 May;5(5):401-410. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30100-7. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
8
Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.基于互联网的与面对面的认知行为疗法治疗精神和躯体障碍:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
9
Modelling and Predicting eHealth Usage in Europe: A Multidimensional Approach From an Online Survey of 13,000 European Union Internet Users.欧洲电子健康使用情况的建模与预测:基于对13000名欧盟互联网用户的在线调查的多维方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 22;18(7):e188. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5605.
10
Internet-delivered cognitive control training as a preventive intervention for remitted depressed patients: Evidence from a double-blind randomized controlled trial study.互联网认知控制训练作为缓解期抑郁症患者的预防性干预措施:来自一项双盲随机对照试验研究的证据。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Feb;85(2):135-146. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000128. Epub 2016 Jun 30.