Suppr超能文献

氯沙坦治疗 COVID-19 相关肺损伤住院患者的疗效:一项随机临床试验。

Efficacy of Losartan in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19-Induced Lung Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222735. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2735.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

SARS-CoV-2 viral entry may disrupt angiotensin II (AII) homeostasis, contributing to COVID-19 induced lung injury. AII type 1 receptor blockade mitigates lung injury in preclinical models, although data in humans with COVID-19 remain mixed.

OBJECTIVE

To test the efficacy of losartan to reduce lung injury in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted in 13 hospitals in the United States from April 2020 to February 2021. Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and a respiratory sequential organ failure assessment score of at least 1 and not already using a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor were eligible for participation. Data were analyzed from April 19 to August 24, 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Losartan 50 mg orally twice daily vs equivalent placebo for 10 days or until hospital discharge.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the imputed arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (Pao2:Fio2) ratio at 7 days. Secondary outcomes included ordinal COVID-19 severity; days without supplemental o2, ventilation, or vasopressors; and mortality. Losartan pharmacokinetics and RAAS components (AII, angiotensin-[1-7] and angiotensin-converting enzymes 1 and 2)] were measured in a subgroup of participants.

RESULTS

A total of 205 participants (mean [SD] age, 55.2 [15.7] years; 123 [60.0%] men) were randomized, with 101 participants assigned to losartan and 104 participants assigned to placebo. Compared with placebo, losartan did not significantly affect Pao2:Fio2 ratio at 7 days (difference, -24.8 [95%, -55.6 to 6.1]; P = .12). Compared with placebo, losartan did not improve any secondary clinical outcomes and led to fewer vasopressor-free days than placebo (median [IQR], 9.4 [9.1-9.8] vasopressor-free days vs 8.7 [8.2-9.3] vasopressor-free days).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial found that initiation of orally administered losartan to hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and acute lung injury did not improve Pao2:Fio2 ratio at 7 days. These data may have implications for ongoing clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04312009.

摘要

重要性

SARS-CoV-2 病毒进入可能会破坏血管紧张素 II(AII)的平衡,导致 COVID-19 引起的肺损伤。在临床前模型中,AII 型 1 受体阻断可减轻肺损伤,但 COVID-19 患者的数据仍存在差异。

目的

测试氯沙坦降低 COVID-19 住院患者肺损伤的疗效。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在美国 13 家医院进行的、盲法、安慰剂对照的随机临床试验,于 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 2 月进行。符合条件的住院 COVID-19 患者的呼吸序贯器官衰竭评估评分至少为 1 分,且尚未使用肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)抑制剂。数据于 2021 年 4 月 19 日至 8 月 24 日进行分析。

干预措施

氯沙坦 50mg 口服,每日两次,持续 10 天或直至出院。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局为 7 天时动脉部分氧分压与吸入氧分数(Pao2:Fio2)比值的估计值。次要结局包括 COVID-19 严重程度的顺序;无需补充氧气、通气或血管加压素的天数;以及死亡率。对部分参与者测量了氯沙坦的药代动力学和 RAAS 成分(AII、血管紧张素-[1-7]和血管紧张素转换酶 1 和 2)。

结果

共有 205 名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄 55.2[15.7]岁;123[60.0%]为男性)被随机分配,101 名参与者接受氯沙坦治疗,104 名参与者接受安慰剂治疗。与安慰剂相比,氯沙坦在第 7 天并未显著影响 Pao2:Fio2 比值(差异-24.8[95%,-55.6 至 6.1];P=0.12)。与安慰剂相比,氯沙坦并未改善任何次要临床结局,且与安慰剂相比,使用血管加压素的天数更少(中位数[IQR],9.4[9.1-9.8]天无血管加压素与 8.7[8.2-9.3]天无血管加压素)。

结论和相关性

这项随机临床试验发现,对于 COVID-19 合并急性肺损伤的住院患者,开始口服氯沙坦治疗并未改善第 7 天的 Pao2:Fio2 比值。这些数据可能对正在进行的临床试验具有重要意义。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04312009。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6469/8928006/e25a8bdb8d29/jamanetwopen-e222735-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验