• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

康复病房中评估脑卒中患者康复动机的新评价量表的制定与验证。

Development and validation of new evaluation scale for measuring stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation in rehabilitation wards.

机构信息

Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Graduate School of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 17;17(3):e0265214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265214. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0265214
PMID:35298513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8929594/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop the Motivation in stroke patients for rehabilitation scale (MORE scale), following the Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN).

METHOD

Study participants included rehabilitation professionals working at the convalescent rehabilitation hospital and stroke patients admitted to the hospital. The original MORE scale was developed from an item pool, which was created through discussions of nine rehabilitation professionals. After the content validity of the scale was verified using the Delphi method with 61 rehabilitation professionals and 22 stroke patients, the scale's validity and reliability were examined for 201 stroke patients. The construct validity of the scale was investigated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and item response theory analysis. Cronbach's alpha confirmed its internal consistency. Regarding convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity, Spearman's rho was calculated between the MORE scale and the Apathy Scale (AS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which rates the subjective feelings of motivation.

RESULTS

Using the Delphi method, 17 items were incorporated into the MORE scale. According to EFA and CFA, a one-factor model was suggested. All MORE scale items demonstrated satisfactory item response, with item slopes ranging from 0.811 to 2.142, and item difficulty parameters ranging from -3.203 to 0.522. Cronbach's alpha was 0.948. Regarding test-retest reliability, a moderate correlation was found between scores at the beginning and one month after hospitalization (rho = 0.612. p < 0.001). The MORE scale showed significant correlation with AS (rho = -0.536, p < 0.001), SDS (rho = -0.347, p < 0.001), and VAS (rho = 0.536, p < 0.001), confirming the convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MORE scale was verified as a valid and reliable scale for evaluating stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在遵循共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN),开发用于评估脑卒中患者康复动机的量表(MORE 量表)。

方法

研究参与者包括在康复医院工作的康复专业人员和住院的脑卒中患者。原始 MORE 量表由一个项目池发展而来,该项目池是通过与 9 名康复专业人员的讨论创建的。在使用德尔菲法对 61 名康复专业人员和 22 名脑卒中患者进行量表内容有效性验证后,对 201 名脑卒中患者进行了量表的有效性和信度检验。使用探索性因子分析(EFA)、验证性因子分析(CFA)和项目反应理论分析对量表的建构效度进行了研究。Cronbach's alpha 验证了其内部一致性。为了检验量表的聚合效度、区分效度和效标效度,计算了 MORE 量表与淡漠量表(AS)、自评抑郁量表(SDS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)之间的 Spearman's rho 相关系数,这三个量表都用于评估患者的动机主观感受。

结果

通过德尔菲法,17 个项目被纳入 MORE 量表。根据 EFA 和 CFA,建议采用单因素模型。所有 MORE 量表项目的项目反应均令人满意,项目斜率范围为 0.811 至 2.142,项目难度参数范围为-3.203 至 0.522。Cronbach's alpha 为 0.948。在测试重测信度方面,住院初和住院一个月后得分之间存在中度相关性(rho = 0.612,p < 0.001)。MORE 量表与 AS(rho = -0.536,p < 0.001)、SDS(rho = -0.347,p < 0.001)和 VAS(rho = 0.536,p < 0.001)之间存在显著相关性,分别证实了聚合效度、区分效度和效标效度。

结论

MORE 量表被验证为评估脑卒中患者康复动机的有效且可靠的量表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d393/8929594/d75a6bd6377b/pone.0265214.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d393/8929594/eb0eaea536a7/pone.0265214.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d393/8929594/9b95f7e10550/pone.0265214.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d393/8929594/d75a6bd6377b/pone.0265214.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d393/8929594/eb0eaea536a7/pone.0265214.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d393/8929594/9b95f7e10550/pone.0265214.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d393/8929594/d75a6bd6377b/pone.0265214.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of new evaluation scale for measuring stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation in rehabilitation wards.康复病房中评估脑卒中患者康复动机的新评价量表的制定与验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 17;17(3):e0265214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265214. eCollection 2022.
2
Design and psychometric evaluation of epilepsy-related apathy scale (E-RAS) in adults with epilepsy: a sequential exploratory mixed methods design.癫痫成人患者癫痫相关性冷漠量表(E-RAS)的设计与心理测量学评估:一项序贯探索性混合方法设计
BMC Neurol. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02139-2.
3
Validation of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in an Indonesian population: a scale adaptation study.医院焦虑和抑郁量表在印度尼西亚人群中的验证:量表适应性研究。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Jun;11(2). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2022-001775.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation of Life Satisfaction Checklist-11 among persons with stroke in China: A reliability and validity study.生活满意度检查表-11 在我国脑卒中患者中的跨文化调适:信度和效度研究。
Physiother Res Int. 2021 Apr;26(2):e1887. doi: 10.1002/pri.1887. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
5
Development and psychometric testing of the Self-Care of Stroke Inventory.中风自我护理量表的编制与心理测量学测试。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Mar;46(6):1178-1187. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2196093. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
6
Non-suicidal self-injury motivation scale in a community sample of adolescents: a methodological study.非自杀性自伤动机量表在青少年社区样本中的应用:一项方法学研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 24;12(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01795-6.
7
The Stroke Stigma Scale: a reliable and valid stigma measure in patients with stroke.《中风耻辱量表》:中风患者中可靠有效的耻辱感测量工具。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Nov;33(11):1800-1809. doi: 10.1177/0269215519862329. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
8
Development and validation of the Health Activation Scale for Children (HAS-C): an important intermediate outcome measure for health promotion initiatives.发展和验证儿童健康激活量表(HAS-C):健康促进干预措施的重要中间结果测量指标。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1120. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11526-7.
9
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the pain anxiety symptom scale (PASS-20) in chronic non-specific neck pain patients.疼痛焦虑症状量表(PASS-20)波斯版本在慢性非特异性颈痛患者中的心理测量学特性。
Scand J Pain. 2022 Feb 17;22(3):552-560. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0146. Print 2022 Jul 26.
10
Assessing the desire for aesthetics: Adaptation and validation of the desire for aesthetics scale in German (DFAS-G).评估审美需求:德国审美需求量表(DFAS-G)的适应和验证。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Jul;247:104322. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104322. Epub 2024 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of Wearable Devices for Motivating Post-Stroke Patients.可穿戴设备对中风后患者的激励作用的可行性
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 21;25(16):5204. doi: 10.3390/s25165204.
2
Advances in nursing care for post-stroke limb dysfunction rehabilitation.中风后肢体功能障碍康复护理的进展
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 24;16:1615500. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1615500. eCollection 2025.
3
Patient engagement in inpatient rehabilitation: A scoping review of measures and evolving conceptualizations.住院康复中的患者参与:措施及不断演变的概念的范围综述

本文引用的文献

1
Motivation for Rehabilitation in Patients With Subacute Stroke: A Qualitative Study.亚急性卒中患者康复的动机:一项定性研究。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Jun 7;2:664758. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.664758. eCollection 2021.
2
Motivation in rehabilitation and acquired brain injury: can theory help us understand it?康复和后天性脑损伤中的动机:理论能帮助我们理解它吗?
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Sep;41(19):2343-2349. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1467504. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
3
Psychometric properties of measures of motivation and engagement after acquired brain injury.
Rehabil Psychol. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1037/rep0000630.
4
Depressive Symptoms Are Associated With Reduced Unsupervised Training Engagement in Inpatients With Subacute Stroke: A Secondary Data Analysis Study.抑郁症状与亚急性卒中住院患者无人监督训练参与度降低相关:一项二次数据分析研究
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2025 Jan 2;7(1):100424. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100424. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Web-Based Nursing Intervention to Promote Physical Activity Among Older Adults After Coronary Revascularization: Protocol for Mixed Method Pilot Study.基于网络的护理干预对冠状动脉血运重建术后老年人身体活动的促进作用:混合方法试点研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 21;14:e67678. doi: 10.2196/67678.
6
Development and Evaluation of a Novel Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Device Integrating Piano Playing for Enhanced Motor Recovery.一种集成钢琴弹奏以促进运动恢复的新型上肢康复装置的研发与评估。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Mar 25;10(4):200. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10040200.
7
Motivation in veterans with an acute/subacute ischemic stroke did not improve cognition and functional motor recovery but reduced deaths.患有急性/亚急性缺血性中风的退伍军人的动机并不能改善认知和功能性运动恢复,但能降低死亡率。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2025 Feb;61(1):19-27. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08563-0. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
8
Patient motivation: A concept analysis.患者动机:一项概念分析。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Oct 14;10(5):490-497. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3529. eCollection 2024.
9
The relationship between rehabilitation motivation and upper limb motor function in stroke patients.中风患者康复动机与上肢运动功能之间的关系。
Front Neurol. 2024 May 28;15:1390811. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1390811. eCollection 2024.
10
Influence of motivation on rehabilitation outcomes after subacute stroke in convalescent rehabilitation wards.动机对康复疗养病房亚急性卒中后康复结局的影响。
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 14;14:1185813. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1185813. eCollection 2023.
后天性脑损伤后动机和参与度测量的心理计量学特性。
Rehabil Psychol. 2018 Feb;63(1):92-103. doi: 10.1037/rep0000186.
4
Perceptions of physical activity and walking in an early stage after stroke or acquired brain injury.中风或后天性脑损伤早期对身体活动和步行的认知
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0173463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173463. eCollection 2017.
5
Stroke Survivors' Experiences of Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.中风幸存者的身体康复经历:定性研究的系统评价
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Sep;96(9):1698-708.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
6
A study on the effect of self bedside exercise program on resilience and activities of daily living for patients with hemiplegia.一项关于自我床边锻炼计划对偏瘫患者恢复力和日常生活活动影响的研究。
J Exerc Rehabil. 2015 Feb 28;11(1):30-5. doi: 10.12965/jer.140159. eCollection 2015 Feb.
7
Patient reported outcome measures in practice.实践中的患者报告结局指标
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7818. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7818.
8
Further validation of the Motivation for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Questionnaire (MOT-Q) in patients with acquired brain injury.创伤性脑损伤康复问卷(MOT-Q)在获得性脑损伤患者中的进一步验证。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2016;26(1):87-102. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.1001409. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
9
Motivators for uptake and maintenance of exercise: perceptions of long-term stroke survivors and implications for design of exercise programmes.运动参与和维持的动机:长期中风幸存者的认知及对运动计划设计的启示
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(9):795-801. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.946154. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
10
Modeling factors predictive of functional improvement following acute stroke.急性卒中后功能改善的预测因素建模。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2014 Sep;77(9):469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Jul 26.