• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭成员的特征是否会影响老年人向长期医疗保健服务的过渡?

Do characteristics of family members influence older persons' transition to long-term healthcare services?

机构信息

Statistics Norway, Research Department, P.O. Box 2633, St. Hanshaugen, NO-0131, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Health and Inequality, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, NO-0213, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07745-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-07745-5
PMID:35303891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8933970/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Future demographic and economic changes warrant a better understanding of older persons' need for health-related long-term care services (LTC). LTC uptake among older people is likely to be influenced by the presence or absence of family members, but there is scarce research on the role played by partners with different caregiving potential. There is even less research on the contributions of adult children and their caregiving potential. The current study examines the extent to which transitions into LTC in older men and women differ according to the presence and caregiving potential of partners and children.

METHODS

Linked registry data for Norway on older persons (aged 65+), their partners, and their adult children are used to examine how characteristics of these family members influence transitions into LTC from 2010 to 2016, using logistic discrete-time hazard regression models. We observed around 215,000 transitions to LTC, corresponding to around 26.3% of individuals and 5.4% of the total person-years (4.0 million). Caregiving potential is measured in terms of employment, income, health and educational attainment for partners and education and geographical proximity for children.

RESULTS

Personal, partner and child(ren)'s resources are all associated with older persons' LTC uptake. Unpartnered and/or childless older people are more likely to use LTC than those with partners and/or child(ren). Older persons with resourceful partners and children are the least likely to transition into LTC. The geographical proximity of adult children appears to have only a minor influence on LTC use among older people.

CONCLUSIONS

Population ageing and strained public resources will likely challenge the future provision of formal old-age care. The role of family networks in the future provision of formal old-age care is expected to become progressively important in the years to come. Inequalities in the health, care and welfare of older persons with and without resourceful family members are likely to increase.

摘要

背景

未来的人口和经济变化要求我们更好地了解老年人对与健康相关的长期护理服务(LTC)的需求。老年人对 LTC 的接受程度可能受到家庭成员的存在或缺失的影响,但关于具有不同护理潜力的伴侣所扮演的角色的研究甚少。关于成年子女及其护理潜力的贡献的研究就更少了。本研究考察了老年男性和女性进入 LTC 的程度差异,这些差异取决于伴侣和子女的存在和护理潜力。

方法

利用挪威关于老年人(65 岁以上)及其伴侣和成年子女的关联登记数据,使用逻辑离散时间风险回归模型,研究这些家庭成员的特征如何影响 2010 年至 2016 年期间进入 LTC 的情况。我们观察到大约 215,000 人进入 LTC,相当于大约 26.3%的人和约 5.4%的总人年(400 万人)。伴侣的护理潜力是根据就业、收入、健康和教育程度来衡量的,而子女的护理潜力是根据教育程度和地理位置来衡量的。

结果

个人、伴侣和子女的资源都与老年人的 LTC 使用相关。无伴侣和/或无子女的老年人比有伴侣和/或子女的老年人更有可能使用 LTC。有资源丰富的伴侣和子女的老年人最不可能进入 LTC。成年子女的地理位置接近似乎对老年人使用 LTC 的影响较小。

结论

人口老龄化和公共资源紧张可能会对未来的老年护理服务供应构成挑战。在未来的几年里,家庭网络在提供正规老年护理服务方面的作用预计将变得越来越重要。没有资源丰富的家庭成员的老年人在健康、护理和福利方面的不平等可能会增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69a7/8933970/3b4727e0881f/12913_2022_7745_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69a7/8933970/3b4727e0881f/12913_2022_7745_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69a7/8933970/3b4727e0881f/12913_2022_7745_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Do characteristics of family members influence older persons' transition to long-term healthcare services?家庭成员的特征是否会影响老年人向长期医疗保健服务的过渡?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07745-5.
2
Effect of reduced formal care availability on formal/informal care patterns and caregiver health: a quasi-experimental study using the Japanese long-term care insurance reform.减少正规照料服务供给对正规/非正规照料模式和照料者健康的影响:利用日本长期护理保险改革进行的准实验研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01588-7.
3
Effects of home-based long-term care services on caregiver health according to age.居家长期护理服务对不同年龄段照料者健康的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 23;15(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0786-6.
4
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
Partnership between Primary Health and Social Care Services in the Long-Term Care of Older People with Dementia: A Vignette Study.初级卫生保健与社会保健服务在老年痴呆症患者长期护理中的伙伴关系:案例研究。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211011933. doi: 10.1177/00469580211011933.
6
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe.欧洲各地区长期照护系统中家庭护理使用的社会经济不平等。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 1;76(1):121-132. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa139.
7
Typologies of dependency, household characteristics, and disparity in formal and informal care use: analysis of community-dwelling long-term care insurance claimants in an urban municipality of China.依赖类型、家庭特征与正规和非正规照料使用的差距:对中国一城市社区长期护理保险参保者的分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Nov 10;22(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02048-5.
8
Long-term care use after a stroke or femoral fracture and the role of family caregivers.中风或股骨骨折后的长期护理使用以及家庭护理人员的作用。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 22;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01526-7.
9
Discontinuation of long-term care among persons affected by the 2018 Japan Floods: a longitudinal study using the Long-term Care Insurance Comprehensive Database.受 2018 年日本洪灾影响人群的长期护理中断:使用长期护理保险综合数据库的纵向研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02864-4.
10
Older adults preferences for long-term caregivers in China: a discrete choice experiment.中国老年人对长期照护者的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Public Health. 2024 Jun;231:158-165. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.03.022. Epub 2024 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of health education applying role play on decision making in acute myocardial infarction situation among older adults in community.健康教育应用角色扮演对社区老年人急性心肌梗死情境下决策的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 23;14(1):19627. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70747-2.
2
Informing existing technology acceptance models: a qualitative study with older persons and caregivers.为现有技术接受模型提供信息:一项针对老年人和照顾者的定性研究。
Eur J Ageing. 2024 Mar 29;21(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s10433-024-00801-5.
3
Factors associated with the perceived need for assistance from voluntary services in home-based older adults in Chinese urban areas: a cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Does women's health matter for fertility? Evidence from Norwegian administrative data.女性健康对生育能力有影响吗?来自挪威行政数据的证据。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2022 Jul;76(2):191-212. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2022.2041075. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
2
Geographic Proximity to Parents, Intergenerational Support Exchange, and Migration Within Germany.与父母的地理距离、代际支持交换以及德国境内的移民
Eur J Popul. 2020 Mar 17;36(5):895-918. doi: 10.1007/s10680-020-09558-w. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
Do Marriage and Cohabitation Provide Benefits to Health in Mid-Life? The Role of Childhood Selection Mechanisms and Partnership Characteristics Across Countries.
与中国城市地区居家老年人对自愿服务援助的感知需求相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04354-7.
4
The association between financial support of adult children to their parents and informal care provision in China and its differences in household registration, residence arrangement and community-based care services: 2008 ~ 2018.中国成年子女对父母的经济支持与非正规护理之间的关系及其在户籍、居住安排和社区护理服务方面的差异:2008 年至 2018 年。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Mar 14;22(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01856-z.
婚姻与同居对中年人的健康有益吗?各国童年期选择机制及伴侣关系特征的作用。
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2018;37(5):703-728. doi: 10.1007/s11113-018-9467-3. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
4
The Impact of Informal Caregiving for Older Adults on the Health of Various Types of Caregivers: A Systematic Review.老年人非正式照料对各种类型照料者健康影响的系统性综述。
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):e629-e642. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny137.
5
In sickness and in health: The role of marital partners in cancer survival.无论疾病还是健康:婚姻伴侣在癌症生存中的作用。
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Dec 18;3:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.12.007. eCollection 2017 Dec.
6
Women's employment patterns after childbirth and the perceived access to and use of flexitime and teleworking.产后女性的就业模式以及对弹性工作时间和远程工作的认知、获取与使用情况。
Hum Relat. 2018 Jan;71(1):47-72. doi: 10.1177/0018726717713828. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
7
Relationship Status and Long-Term Care Facility Use in Later Life.晚年的恋爱状况与长期护理机构的使用情况
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 Jul;71(4):711-23. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv106. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
Unequal Inequalities: The Stratification of the Use of Formal Care Among Older Europeans.不平等的不平等:欧洲老年人中正规护理使用的分层
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 May 1;72(3):510-521. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv038.
9
Factors associated with the amount of public home care received by elderly and intellectually disabled individuals in a large Norwegian municipality.挪威一个大市政当局中与老年人和智障人士接受的公共家庭护理量相关的因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 May;24(3):297-308. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12209. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
10
The Importance of Spousal Education for the Self-Rated Health of Married Adults in the United States.配偶教育对美国已婚成年人自评健康的重要性。
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2014 Feb 1;33(1):127-151. doi: 10.1007/s11113-013-9305-6.