Suppr超能文献

微量鉴定法、API 20E鉴定系统与传统培养基系统在肠杆菌科细菌鉴定中的比较

Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

作者信息

Aldridge K E, Gardner B B, Clark S J, Matsen J M

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jun;7(6):507-13. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.6.507-513.1978.

Abstract

The Micro-ID, a new identification kit for Enterobacteriaceae, consists of 15 biochemical tests, with substrates and reagents impregnated in filter paper disks. A 0.2-ml amount of an organism suspension equal to a 0.5 McFarland standard is pipetted into each of the compartments. After 4 h of incubation and addition of potassium-hydroxide (KOH) to the Voges-Proskauer test, the color reactions are read according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. A five-digit octal code number is derived from each set of reactions from which an identification is derived by using a code book. In a single-blind, comparative study of the Micro-ID system with the API 20E system (Analytab Products Inc.) and conventional biochemical tube media, we found that the Micro-ID and the API 20E systems gave a 90% identification correlation when each was compared with the conventional tube media. A comparison of all three systems gave an 82% overall identification correlation. When the common tests of Micro-ID and API 20E were compared with conventional tube media, we found that the tests in the Micro-ID performed as well as or better than those of the API 20E. Certain groups of organisms, i.e., Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Proteus, Salmonella, and Serratia genera, were found to give low correlation on certain common tests. When using primary isolation MacConkey plates from the clinical laboratory, only 74% of the plates with Enterobacteriaceae had sufficient numbers of colonies of each enteric organism to produce the 0.5 McFarland inoculum density required. Problems concerning the misidentification of some organisms are discussed.

摘要

Micro-ID是一种用于肠杆菌科的新型鉴定试剂盒,由15种生化试验组成,底物和试剂浸渍在滤纸片中。将0.2毫升相当于0.5麦氏标准的菌悬液移液至每个隔室。孵育4小时后,在Voges-Proskauer试验中加入氢氧化钾(KOH),然后根据制造商的建议读取颜色反应。从每组反应中得出一个五位八进制编码数字,通过使用编码手册从中得出鉴定结果。在一项将Micro-ID系统与API 20E系统(Analytab Products Inc.)和传统生化试管培养基进行的单盲比较研究中,我们发现,当将Micro-ID和API 20E系统分别与传统试管培养基进行比较时,它们的鉴定相关性为90%。对所有三种系统进行比较,总体鉴定相关性为82%。当将Micro-ID和API 20E的常见试验与传统试管培养基进行比较时,我们发现Micro-ID中的试验表现与API 20E的试验相当或更好。发现某些菌群,即柠檬酸杆菌属、肠杆菌属、变形杆菌属、沙门氏菌属和沙雷氏菌属,在某些常见试验中的相关性较低。当使用临床实验室的初代分离麦康凯平板时,只有74%带有肠杆菌科细菌的平板具有足够数量的每种肠道菌菌落,以产生所需的0.5麦氏接种物密度。讨论了一些关于某些细菌误鉴定的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8918/275051/a1b7b37ec40a/jcm00203-0028-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验