Barry A L, Badal R E, Effinger L J
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Oct;10(4):492-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.4.492-496.1979.
Frozen microdilution trays, with 20 different biochemical test media for identification of Enterobactericeae, were evaluated. The test panels were those provided by Micro-Media Systems (MMS), who also provided a code book for interpretation of the test results. The interpretations of the MMS test system and of the Analytab API 20E test system were compared with those obtained from tests with conventional media. Tests with 468 Enterobacteriaceae demonstrated nearly comparable results with the two commercial systems. About 6% (API) and 7% (MMS) of the isolates could not be identified without additional tests, and another 3% (MMS) to 4% (API) of the isolates gave test patterns that were not found in the code books. One to three percent of the isolates were misidentified. It was concluded that the MMS Enteric Quad Panels provide an efficient, relatively inexpensive, and reasonably accurate method for identification of the Enterobacteriaceae.
对装有20种用于鉴定肠杆菌科的不同生化测试培养基的冷冻微量稀释板进行了评估。测试板由微媒体系统公司(MMS)提供,该公司还提供了一本用于解释测试结果的编码手册。将MMS测试系统和Analytab API 20E测试系统的解释结果与用传统培养基进行测试得到的结果进行了比较。对468株肠杆菌科细菌的测试表明,这两种商业系统的结果几乎相当。约6%(API)和7%(MMS)的分离株在没有额外测试的情况下无法鉴定,另外3%(MMS)至4%(API)的分离株给出了编码手册中未出现的测试模式。1%至3%的分离株被错误鉴定。得出的结论是,MMS肠道四联板为鉴定肠杆菌科提供了一种高效、相对便宜且相当准确的方法。