• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于循环神经网络的急性创伤性脑损伤后长期预后的时间序列建模。

Recurrent Neural Network based Time-Series Modeling for Long-term Prognosis Following Acute Traumatic Brain Injury.

机构信息

The University of Arizona, AZ, USA.

Virginia Tech, VA, USA.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:900-909. eCollection 2021.

PMID:35309007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8861707/
Abstract

We developed a prognostic model for longer-term outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury (TBI) using an attention-based recurrent neural network (RNN). The model was trained on admission and time series data obtained from a multi-site, longitudinal, observational study of TBI patients. We included 110 clinical variables as model input and Glasgow Outcome Score Extended (GOSE) at six months after injury as the outcome variable. Designed to handle missing values in time series data, the RNN model was compared to an existing TBI prognostic model using 10-fold cross validation. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the RNN model is 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.89) for binary outcomes, whereas the AUC of the comparison model is 0.69 (95% CI 0.67-0.71). We demonstrated that including time series data into prognostic models for TBI can boost the discriminative ability of prediction models with either binary or ordinal outcomes.

摘要

我们使用基于注意力的循环神经网络 (RNN) 为创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 的长期预后预测开发了一个预测模型。该模型是在多地点、纵向、TBI 患者观察性研究中获得的入院和时间序列数据上进行训练的。我们将 110 个临床变量作为模型输入,并将损伤后 6 个月的格拉斯哥结局评分扩展 (GOSE) 作为结果变量。该 RNN 模型旨在处理时间序列数据中的缺失值,并用 10 折交叉验证法与现有的 TBI 预后模型进行了比较。RNN 模型的二项结局的接收者操作特征曲线下面积 (AUC) 为 0.86(95%置信区间 0.83-0.89),而比较模型的 AUC 为 0.69(95%置信区间 0.67-0.71)。我们证明,将时间序列数据纳入 TBI 的预后模型可以提高预测模型的判别能力,无论是二项结局还是有序结局。

相似文献

1
Recurrent Neural Network based Time-Series Modeling for Long-term Prognosis Following Acute Traumatic Brain Injury.基于循环神经网络的急性创伤性脑损伤后长期预后的时间序列建模。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:900-909. eCollection 2021.
2
Machine Learning to Predict Three Types of Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury Using Data at Admission: A Multi-Center Study for Development and Validation.机器学习使用入院时的数据预测创伤性脑损伤后的三种结局:一项用于开发和验证的多中心研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Aug;40(15-16):1694-1706. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0515. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
Identifying Important Attributes for Prognostic Prediction in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. A Hybrid Method of Decision Tree and Neural Network.识别创伤性脑损伤患者预后预测的重要属性。一种决策树和神经网络的混合方法。
Methods Inf Med. 2016 Oct 17;55(5):440-449. doi: 10.3414/ME15-01-0080. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
4
Sequential changes in Rotterdam CT scores related to outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury who undergo decompressive craniectomy.接受减压性颅骨切除术的创伤性脑损伤患者的鹿特丹CT评分与预后相关的序贯变化。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;124(6):1640-5. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142760. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
5
The leap to ordinal: Detailed functional prognosis after traumatic brain injury with a flexible modelling approach.从等级跳跃:使用灵活建模方法对创伤性脑损伤后的详细功能预后。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 5;17(7):e0270973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270973. eCollection 2022.
6
Predicting outcome in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury using electroencephalography.使用脑电图预测中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的预后。
Crit Care. 2019 Dec 11;23(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2656-6.
7
An interpretable neural network for outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury.用于创伤性脑损伤预后预测的可解释神经网络。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01953-z.
8
IMPACT Score for Traumatic Brain Injury: Validation of the Prognostic Tool in a Spanish Cohort.创伤性脑损伤的IMPACT评分:在西班牙队列中对该预后工具的验证
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000292.
9
Machine-learning analysis outperforms conventional statistical models and CT classification systems in predicting 6-month outcomes in pediatric patients sustaining traumatic brain injury.机器学习分析在预测外伤性脑损伤患儿 6 个月结局方面优于传统统计学模型和 CT 分类系统。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS17773.
10
Predictors of Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: New Insight Using Receiver Operating Curve Indices and Bayesian Network Analysis.创伤性脑损伤预后的预测因素:使用受试者工作特征曲线指标和贝叶斯网络分析的新见解
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 7;11(7):e0158762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158762. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Intracranial Hypertension in Traumatic Brain Injury Using AI: A Systematic Review of Algorithms and Their Clinical Integration Potential.使用人工智能预测创伤性脑损伤中的颅内高压:算法及其临床整合潜力的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Apr 30;17(4):e83267. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83267. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Advances in analytical approaches for background parenchymal enhancement in predicting breast tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review.用于预测乳腺肿瘤对新辅助化疗反应的背景实质强化分析方法的进展:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 7;20(3):e0317240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317240. eCollection 2025.
3
Mining the contribution of intensive care clinical course to outcome after traumatic brain injury.探究重症监护临床过程对创伤性脑损伤后预后的影响。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Aug 21;6(1):154. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00895-8.
4
WindowSHAP: An efficient framework for explaining time-series classifiers based on Shapley values.WindowSHAP:一种基于 Shapley 值解释时间序列分类器的高效框架。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Aug;144:104438. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104438. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
5
An Empirical Comparison of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods for Clinical Data: A Case Study on Traumatic Brain Injury.基于临床数据的可解释人工智能方法的实证比较:以创伤性脑损伤为例。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:815-824. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Unsupervised Machine Learning Reveals Novel Traumatic Brain Injury Patient Phenotypes with Distinct Acute Injury Profiles and Long-Term Outcomes.无监督机器学习揭示具有不同急性损伤特征和长期结局的新型创伤性脑损伤患者表型。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jun 15;37(12):1431-1444. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6705. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
2
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.系统评价显示,机器学习在临床预测模型中并未优于逻辑回归。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
3
Recurrent Neural Networks for Multivariate Time Series with Missing Values.具有缺失值的多元时间序列的递归神经网络。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 17;8(1):6085. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24271-9.
4
Challenges associated with missing data in electronic health records: A case study of a risk prediction model for diabetes using data from Slovenian primary care.电子健康记录中缺失数据相关的挑战:使用斯洛文尼亚初级保健数据的糖尿病风险预测模型的案例研究。
Health Informatics J. 2019 Sep;25(3):951-959. doi: 10.1177/1460458217733288. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
5
Development of a Prediction Model for Post-Concussive Symptoms following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Pilot Study.轻度创伤性脑损伤后创伤后症状预测模型的开发:TRACK-TBI试点研究
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Aug 15;34(16):2396-2409. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4819. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
6
Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013.2007年和2013年美国与创伤性脑损伤相关的急诊科就诊、住院及死亡情况
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Mar 17;66(9):1-16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6609a1.
7
Cost-sensitive Performance Metric for Comparing Multiple Ordinal Classifiers.用于比较多个有序分类器的成本敏感性能指标。
Artif Intell Res. 2016;5(1):135-143. doi: 10.5430/air.v5n1p135. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
8
Outcome prediction after mild and complicated mild traumatic brain injury: external validation of existing models and identification of new predictors using the TRACK-TBI pilot study.轻度和复杂性轻度创伤性脑损伤后的结果预测:现有模型的外部验证以及使用TRACK-TBI初步研究识别新的预测因素
J Neurotrauma. 2015 Jan 15;32(2):83-94. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3384. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
9
Transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury pilot: multicenter implementation of the common data elements for traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤研究和临床知识转化:创伤性脑损伤通用数据元素的多中心实施。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Nov 15;30(22):1831-44. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2970. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
10
Prediction of outcome in severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤的预后预测
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Oct;15(5):437-41. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283307a26.