• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于创伤性脑损伤预后预测的可解释神经网络。

An interpretable neural network for outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01953-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-022-01953-z
PMID:35915430
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9341077/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a common condition with potentially severe long-term complications, the prediction of which remains challenging. Machine learning (ML) methods have been used previously to help physicians predict long-term outcomes of TBI so that appropriate treatment plans can be adopted. However, many ML techniques are "black box": it is difficult for humans to understand the decisions made by the model, with post-hoc explanations only identifying isolated relevant factors rather than combinations of factors. Moreover, such models often rely on many variables, some of which might not be available at the time of hospitalization.

METHODS

In this study, we apply an interpretable neural network model based on tropical geometry to predict unfavorable outcomes at six months from hospitalization in TBI patients, based on information available at the time of admission.

RESULTS

The proposed method is compared to established machine learning methods-XGBoost, Random Forest, and SVM-achieving comparable performance in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)-0.799 for the proposed method vs. 0.810 for the best black box model. Moreover, the proposed method allows for the extraction of simple, human-understandable rules that explain the model's predictions and can be used as general guidelines by clinicians to inform treatment decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

The classification results for the proposed model are comparable with those of traditional ML methods. However, our model is interpretable, and it allows the extraction of intelligible rules. These rules can be used to determine relevant factors in assessing TBI outcomes and can be used in situations when not all necessary factors are known to inform the full model's decision.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一种常见的疾病,可能会产生严重的长期并发症,其预测仍然具有挑战性。机器学习(ML)方法以前曾被用于帮助医生预测 TBI 的长期结果,以便采用适当的治疗计划。然而,许多 ML 技术是“黑盒”:人类很难理解模型做出的决策,事后解释只能识别孤立的相关因素,而不是因素组合。此外,此类模型通常依赖于许多变量,其中一些在住院时可能不可用。

方法

在这项研究中,我们应用了一种基于热带几何的可解释神经网络模型,根据 TBI 患者住院时的可用信息,预测六个月时的不良结局。

结果

所提出的方法与已建立的机器学习方法(XGBoost、随机森林和 SVM)进行了比较,在接收器工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积方面表现相当(提出的方法为 0.799,最佳黑盒模型为 0.810)。此外,所提出的方法允许提取简单的、人类可理解的规则,解释模型的预测,并可作为临床医生的一般指导原则,为治疗决策提供信息。

结论

所提出模型的分类结果与传统 ML 方法相当。然而,我们的模型是可解释的,它允许提取可理解的规则。这些规则可用于确定评估 TBI 结果的相关因素,并可用于在不知道所有必要因素的情况下告知完整模型决策的情况下使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e2/9341077/1017dac19439/12911_2022_1953_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e2/9341077/435a83945edc/12911_2022_1953_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e2/9341077/a15c1cfbb8f4/12911_2022_1953_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e2/9341077/1017dac19439/12911_2022_1953_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e2/9341077/435a83945edc/12911_2022_1953_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e2/9341077/a15c1cfbb8f4/12911_2022_1953_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e2/9341077/1017dac19439/12911_2022_1953_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An interpretable neural network for outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury.用于创伤性脑损伤预后预测的可解释神经网络。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01953-z.
2
Machine Learning to Predict Three Types of Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury Using Data at Admission: A Multi-Center Study for Development and Validation.机器学习使用入院时的数据预测创伤性脑损伤后的三种结局:一项用于开发和验证的多中心研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Aug;40(15-16):1694-1706. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0515. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
A Machine Learning-Based Approach to Predict Prognosis and Length of Hospital Stay in Adults and Children With Traumatic Brain Injury: Retrospective Cohort Study.基于机器学习的方法预测成人和儿童创伤性脑损伤患者的预后和住院时间:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 9;24(12):e41819. doi: 10.2196/41819.
4
Comparison of machine learning models to predict long-term outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury.比较机器学习模型预测严重创伤性脑损伤后长期预后的能力。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jun;54(6):E14. doi: 10.3171/2023.3.FOCUS2376.
5
A deep neural network framework to derive interpretable decision rules for accurate traumatic brain injury identification of infants.一种用于准确识别婴儿创伤性脑损伤的可解释决策规则的深度神经网络框架。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02155-x.
6
Development of a System for Predicting Hospitalization Time for Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Machine Learning Algorithms: User-Centered Design Case Study.基于机器学习算法的创伤性脑损伤患者住院时间预测系统的开发:以用户为中心的设计案例研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 30;11:e62866. doi: 10.2196/62866.
7
Machine-learning analysis outperforms conventional statistical models and CT classification systems in predicting 6-month outcomes in pediatric patients sustaining traumatic brain injury.机器学习分析在预测外伤性脑损伤患儿 6 个月结局方面优于传统统计学模型和 CT 分类系统。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS17773.
8
Application of machine learning to predict the outcome of pediatric traumatic brain injury.机器学习在预测小儿外伤性脑损伤结果中的应用。
Chin J Traumatol. 2021 Nov;24(6):350-355. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
9
Machine learning algorithms for improved prediction of in-hospital outcomes after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: a Chinese retrospective cohort study.机器学习算法在提高中重度创伤性脑损伤住院预后预测中的应用:一项中国回顾性队列研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Aug;165(8):2237-2247. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05647-x. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
10
Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach.创伤性脑损伤机械通气患者住院死亡率的预测:机器学习方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01363-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting outcomes after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using artificial intelligence: a systematic review.使用人工智能预测中度和重度创伤性脑损伤后的结果:一项系统综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jun 18;8(1):373. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01714-y.
2
Data-driven distillation and precision prognosis in traumatic brain injury with interpretable machine learning.基于数据驱动的外伤性脑损伤解析与可解释机器学习精准预后。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 1;13(1):21200. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48054-z.
3
Mining the contribution of intensive care clinical course to outcome after traumatic brain injury.

本文引用的文献

1
A Novel Tropical Geometry-Based Interpretable Machine Learning Method: Pilot Application to Delivery of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies.一种新颖的基于热带几何的可解释机器学习方法:在心力衰竭先进治疗方案中的初步应用。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023 Jan;27(1):239-250. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3211765. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
2
Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.用于预测创伤性脑损伤患者院内死亡率的机器学习算法
J Pers Med. 2021 Nov 4;11(11):1144. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111144.
3
A hierarchical expert-guided machine learning framework for clinical decision support systems: an application to traumatic brain injury prognostication.
探究重症监护临床过程对创伤性脑损伤后预后的影响。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Aug 21;6(1):154. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00895-8.
4
AI-Based Decision Support System for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Survey.基于人工智能的创伤性脑损伤决策支持系统:一项综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 5;13(9):1640. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091640.
用于临床决策支持系统的分层专家指导机器学习框架:在创伤性脑损伤预后中的应用
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 May 7;4(1):78. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00445-0.
4
Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with post traumatic brain injury using National Trauma Registry and Machine Learning Approach.应用国家创伤登记处和机器学习方法预测创伤性脑损伤患者的院内死亡率。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 May 27;28(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00738-5.
5
Outcomes after Complicated and Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury at Three-and Six-Months Post-Injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI Study.复杂型与非复杂型轻度创伤性脑损伤伤后3个月和6个月的转归:CENTER-TBI研究结果
J Clin Med. 2020 May 18;9(5):1525. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051525.
6
Machine learning algorithms performed no better than regression models for prognostication in traumatic brain injury.机器学习算法在预测创伤性脑损伤方面并不比回归模型表现得更好。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
7
Prediction of Early TBI Mortality Using a Machine Learning Approach in a LMIC Population.在低收入和中等收入国家人群中使用机器学习方法预测早期创伤性脑损伤死亡率
Front Neurol. 2020 Jan 24;10:1366. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01366. eCollection 2019.
8
Machine Learning to Predict In-Hospital Morbidity and Mortality after Traumatic Brain Injury.机器学习预测创伤性脑损伤后的住院期间发病率和死亡率。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jan 1;37(1):202-210. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6276. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
9
Patterns of traumatic brain injury and six-month neuropsychological outcomes in Uganda.乌干达创伤性脑损伤模式及六个月神经心理学结果
BMC Neurol. 2019 Feb 4;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1246-1.
10
Mortality prediction in patients with isolated moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning models.使用机器学习模型预测单纯中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 9;13(11):e0207192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207192. eCollection 2018.