Xavier Diego Ricardo, Lima E Silva Eliane, Lara Flávio Alves, E Silva Gabriel R R, Oliveira Marcus F, Gurgel Helen, Barcellos Christovam
Health Information Laboratory, Health Communication and Information Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Avenida Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21045-900, Brazil.
International Joint Laboratory, LMI Sentinela (UnB - Fiocruz - IRD), Brasília-DF, Montpellier, France, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jun;10:100221. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100221. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
Brazil has been severely impacted by COVID-19 pandemics that is aggravated by the absence of a scientifically-driven coordinated informative campaign and the interference in public health management, which ultimately affected health measures to avoid SARS-CoV2 spread. The decentralization and resultant conflicts in disease control activities produced different protection behaviours and local government measures. In the present study, we investigated how political partisanship and socio-economic factors determined the outcome of COVID-19 at the local level in Brazil.
A retrospective study of COVID-19 deaths was carried out using mortality databases between Feb 2020, and Jun 2021 for the 5570 Brazilian municipalities. Socio-economic parameters including city categories, income and inequality indexes, health service quality and partisanship, assessed by the result of the second round of the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections, were included. Regression tree analysis was carried out to identify the statistical significance and conditioning relationships of variables.
Municipalities that supported then-candidate Jair Bolsonaro in the 2018 elections were those that had the worst COVID-19 mortality rates, mainly during the second epidemic wave of 2021. This pattern was observed even considering structural inequalities among cities.
In general, the first phase of the pandemic hit large and central cities hardest, while the second wave mostly impacted Bolsonarian municipalities, where scientific denialism among the population was stronger. Negative effects of partisanship towards the right-wing on COVID-19 outcomes counterbalances favourable socioeconomic indexes in affluent Brazilian cities. Our results underscore the fragility of public health policies which were undermined by the scientific denialism of right-wing supporters in Brazil.
International joint laboratories of , a partnership between the University of Brasília and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (LMI-Sentinela - UnB - Fiocruz - IRD), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).
巴西受到新冠疫情的严重影响,缺乏科学驱动的协调宣传活动以及对公共卫生管理的干扰加剧了这种影响,最终影响了避免新冠病毒传播的卫生措施。疾病控制活动的权力下放以及由此产生的冲突导致了不同的保护行为和地方政府措施。在本研究中,我们调查了政治党派关系和社会经济因素如何在巴西地方层面决定新冠疫情的结果。
利用2020年2月至2021年6月期间5570个巴西城市的死亡率数据库,对新冠死亡病例进行回顾性研究。纳入了社会经济参数,包括城市类别、收入和不平等指数、卫生服务质量以及党派关系(通过2018年巴西总统选举第二轮结果评估)。进行回归树分析以确定变量的统计显著性和条件关系。
在2018年选举中支持当时的候选人雅伊尔·博索纳罗的城市,新冠死亡率最差,主要是在2021年的第二波疫情期间。即使考虑到城市之间的结构不平等,这种模式也很明显。
总体而言,疫情的第一阶段对大城市和中心城市影响最大,而第二波疫情主要影响支持博索纳罗的城市,那里民众中的科学否定主义更强。右翼党派关系对新冠疫情结果的负面影响抵消了巴西富裕城市有利的社会经济指数。我们的结果强调了公共卫生政策的脆弱性,这些政策在巴西被右翼支持者的科学否定主义所破坏。
巴西利亚大学与奥斯瓦尔多·克鲁兹基金会的国际联合实验室(LMI - Sentinela - UnB - Fiocruz - IRD)、高等教育人员改进协调办公室(CAPES)、国家科学技术发展委员会(CNPq)。