Suppr超能文献

方法评估人类骨组织的骨质量:系统综述。

Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review.

机构信息

ZESBO - Center for Research On Musculoskeletal Systems, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 20 Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 21;17(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03041-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For biomechanical investigations on bone or bone implants, bone quality represents an important potential bias. Several techniques for assessing bone quality have been described in the literature. This study aims to systematically summarize the methods currently available for assessing bone quality in human bone tissue, and to discuss the advantages and limitations of these techniques.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to April 2021. References will be screened and evaluated for eligibility by two independent reviewers as per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies must apply to bone quality assessment with imaging techniques, mechanical testing modalities, and compositional characterization. The terms used for the systematic search were: "(bone quality". Ti,ab.) AND "(human bone specimens)".

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 502 relevant articles in total. Sixty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria. Among them, forty-seven articles investigated several imaging modalities, including radiography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), CT-based techniques, and MRI-based methods. Nineteen articles dealt with mechanical testing approaches, including traditional testing modalities and novel indentation techniques. Nine articles reported the correlation between bone quality and compositional characterization, such as degree of bone mineralization (DBM) and organic composition. A total of 2898 human cadaveric bone specimens were included.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced techniques are playing an increasingly important role due to their multiple advantages, focusing on the assessment of bone morphology and microarchitecture. Non-invasive imaging modalities and mechanical testing techniques, as well as the assessment of bone composition, need to complement each other to provide comprehensive and ideal information on the bone quality of human bone specimens.

摘要

背景

在骨骼或骨植入物的生物力学研究中,骨质量是一个重要的潜在偏差因素。文献中已经描述了几种评估骨质量的技术。本研究旨在系统总结目前可用于评估人类骨组织骨质量的方法,并讨论这些技术的优缺点。

方法

通过检索 PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库,从 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 4 月进行了系统的文献回顾。根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,两名独立评审员将筛选和评估参考文献的资格。研究必须应用于具有成像技术、机械测试模式和成分特征的骨质量评估。系统搜索中使用的术语是:“(骨质量”。Ti,ab.)和“(人类骨标本)”。

结果

系统综述共确定了 502 篇相关文章。68 篇文章符合纳入标准。其中,47 篇文章研究了几种成像方式,包括放射照相术、双能 X 射线吸收测定法(DEXA)、基于 CT 的技术和基于 MRI 的方法。19 篇文章涉及机械测试方法,包括传统测试模式和新型压痕技术。9 篇文章报告了骨质量与成分特征之间的相关性,如骨矿物质化程度(DBM)和有机成分。共纳入 2898 个人体尸体骨标本。

结论

由于具有多种优势,先进技术在评估骨骼形态和微结构方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。非侵入性成像方式和机械测试技术以及骨成分的评估需要相互补充,以提供有关人体骨标本骨质量的全面和理想信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/046c/8935787/b99ca14a8cfd/13018_2022_3041_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验