Martinez-Fierro Margarita L, González-Fuentes Carolina, Cid-Guerrero Dagoberto, González Delgado Samantha, Carrillo-Martínez Santiago, Gutierrez-Vela Edgar Fernando, Calzada-Luévano Juan Yadid, Rocha-Pizaña Maria R, Martínez-Rendón Jacqueline, Castañeda-López Maria E, Garza-Veloz Idalia
Molecular Medicine Laboratory, Unidad Académica de Medicina Humana y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas 98160, Mexico.
Hospital General "Luz González Cosío", Circuito Ciudad Gobierno, Zacatecas 98160, Mexico.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 11;12(3):687. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030687.
SARS-CoV-2 is the etiological agent of COVID-19 and may evolve from asymptomatic disease to fatal outcomes. Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) screening is the gold standard to diagnose severe accurate respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but this test is not 100% accurate, as false negatives can occur. We aimed to evaluate the potential false-negative results in hospitalized patients suspected of viral respiratory disease but with a negative previous SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and analyze variables that may increase the success of COVID-19 diagnosis in this group of patients. A total of 55 hospitalized patients suspected of viral respiratory disease but with a previous negative RT-PCR result for SARS-CoV-2 were included. All the participants had clinical findings related to COVID-19 and underwent a second SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Chest-computed axial tomography (CT) was used as an auxiliary tool for COVID-19 diagnosis. After the second test, 36 patients (65.5%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 group), and 19 patients (34.5%) were negative (controls). There were differences between the groups in the platelet count and the levels of D-dimer, procalcitonin, and glucose (p < 0.05). Chest CT scans categorized as COVID-19 Reporting and Data System 5 (CO-RADS 5) were more frequent in the COVID-19 group than in the control group (91.7% vs. 52.6%; p = 0.003). CO-RADS 5 remained an independent predictor of COVID-19 diagnosis in a second SARS-CoV-2 screening (p = 0.013; odds ratio = 7.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5−32.7). In conclusion, chest CT classified as CO-RADS 5 was an independent predictor of a positive second SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, increasing the odds of COVID-19 diagnosis by seven times. Based on our results, in hospitalized patients with a chest CT classified as CO-RADS 5, a second SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test should be mandatory when the first one is negative. This approach could increase SARS-CoV-2 detection up to 65% and could allow for isolation and treatment, thus improving the patient outcome and avoiding further contagion.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)是冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的病原体,其感染可能从无症状发展至致命。实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测是诊断严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的金标准,但该检测并非100%准确,可能会出现假阴性结果。我们旨在评估疑似病毒性呼吸道疾病住院患者中潜在的假阴性结果,这些患者之前的SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测结果为阴性,并分析可能提高该组患者COVID-19诊断成功率的变量。共纳入55例疑似病毒性呼吸道疾病住院患者,其之前的SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测结果为阴性。所有参与者均有与COVID-19相关的临床表现,并接受了第二次SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测。胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)用作COVID-19诊断的辅助工具。第二次检测后,36例患者(65.5%)SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性(COVID-19组),19例患者(34.5%)检测呈阴性(对照组)。两组在血小板计数、D-二聚体、降钙素原和血糖水平方面存在差异(p<0.05)。COVID-19组中分类为COVID-19报告和数据系统5(CO-RADS 5)的胸部CT扫描比对照组更常见(91.7%对52.6%;p=0.003)。在第二次SARS-CoV-2筛查中,CO-RADS 5仍然是COVID-19诊断的独立预测因素(p=0.013;比值比=7.0,95%置信区间1.5−32.7)。总之,分类为CO-RADS 5的胸部CT是第二次SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测呈阳性的独立预测因素,将COVID-19诊断的几率提高了7倍。根据我们的结果,对于胸部CT分类为CO-RADS 5的住院患者,首次检测为阴性时应强制进行第二次SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测。这种方法可将SARS-CoV-2检测率提高至65%,并可实现隔离和治疗,从而改善患者预后并避免进一步传播。