Heagele Tara N, Adams Lavonne M, McNeill Charleen C, Alfred Danita M
Hunter College School of Nursing, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Harris College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Mar 25;17:e126. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.35.
The aim of this study was to pilot test the Household Emergency Preparedness Instrument (HEPI) with a diverse sample, allowing for assessment of reliability and validity of the instrument. The HEPI is an international, all-hazards questionnaire created to measure disaster preparedness of households, which results in data that can be used to enhance health promotion/disease prevention for individuals and promote resilience for communities.
A cross-sectional study of faculty, staff, and students ( = 284) was completed to perform factor analysis to establish the HEPI's construct validity and compare preparedness across groups.
The factor analysis revealed 2 dimensions of general preparedness, explaining 35% of the sample variance (Cronbach's α = 0.89): preparedness actions and planning (α = 0.86) and disaster supplies and resources (α = 0.80). This factor analysis resulted in the revision of the subscaling of HEPI questions. Consistent with previous studies, faculty/staff, older age, higher income, and those with previous disaster experience were more prepared. The mean score was 15.28 out of 40 points.
The HEPI is easy to administer and explains an acceptable amount of variance. The reliability was strong in this assessment, particularly for a pilot test. Construct, criterion, face, and content validity support the adequacy of the HEPI to capture essentials of household emergency preparedness.
本研究旨在对家庭应急准备工具(HEPI)进行试点测试,样本具有多样性,以便评估该工具的信度和效度。HEPI是一份国际性的全灾害调查问卷,旨在衡量家庭的灾害准备情况,其所得数据可用于加强个人的健康促进/疾病预防,并提升社区的恢复力。
对教职员工和学生(n = 284)进行了一项横断面研究,以进行因子分析,确立HEPI的结构效度,并比较不同群体的准备情况。
因子分析揭示了总体准备情况的两个维度,解释了35%的样本方差(Cronbach's α = 0.89):准备行动与规划(α = 0.86)以及灾害物资与资源(α = 0.80)。该因子分析导致对HEPI问题的子量表进行了修订。与先前研究一致,教职员工、年龄较大、收入较高以及有过灾害经历的人准备更为充分。平均得分为40分中的15.28分。
HEPI易于实施,且能解释相当可观的方差量。在本次评估中,信度较强,尤其是对于一次试点测试而言。结构效度、效标效度、表面效度和内容效度均支持HEPI足以捕捉家庭应急准备的要点。