• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间风险认知对密切接触频率的影响。

The influence of risk perceptions on close contact frequency during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

机构信息

UHasselt, Data Science Institute, I-BioStat, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium.

Centre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 25;12(1):5192. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09037-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-09037-8
PMID:35338202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8951651/
Abstract

Human behaviour is known to be crucial in the propagation of infectious diseases through respiratory or close-contact routes like the current SARS-CoV-2 virus. Intervention measures implemented to curb the spread of the virus mainly aim at limiting the number of close contacts, until vaccine roll-out is complete. Our main objective was to assess the relationships between SARS-CoV-2 perceptions and social contact behaviour in Belgium. Understanding these relationships is crucial to maximize interventions' effectiveness, e.g. by tailoring public health communication campaigns. In this study, we surveyed a representative sample of adults in Belgium in two longitudinal surveys (survey 1 in April 2020 to August 2020, and survey 2 in November 2020 to April 2021). Generalized linear mixed effects models were used to analyse the two surveys. Participants with low and neutral perceptions on perceived severity made a significantly higher number of social contacts as compared to participants with high levels of perceived severity after controlling for other variables. Our results highlight the key role of perceived severity on social contact behaviour during a pandemic. Nevertheless, additional research is required to investigate the impact of public health communication on severity of COVID-19 in terms of changes in social contact behaviour.

摘要

众所周知,人类行为在通过呼吸道或密切接触途径(如当前的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒)传播传染病方面起着至关重要的作用。为了遏制病毒的传播而实施的干预措施主要旨在限制密切接触者的数量,直到疫苗全面推出。我们的主要目的是评估比利时 SARS-CoV-2 认知与社会接触行为之间的关系。了解这些关系对于最大限度地提高干预措施的效果至关重要,例如通过调整公共卫生宣传活动。在这项研究中,我们在两个纵向调查中对比利时的代表性成年人样本进行了调查(2020 年 4 月至 8 月的调查 1,以及 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 4 月的调查 2)。使用广义线性混合效应模型分析了这两个调查。在控制其他变量后,与高严重程度感知水平的参与者相比,对感知严重程度持低或中性看法的参与者的社会接触数量明显更多。我们的研究结果强调了在大流行期间感知严重程度对社会接触行为的关键作用。然而,需要进一步研究公共卫生宣传对 COVID-19 严重程度(包括社会接触行为变化)的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eec/8956702/d285e7bb3927/41598_2022_9037_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eec/8956702/f3cbf099842c/41598_2022_9037_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eec/8956702/7f06f41e9a87/41598_2022_9037_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eec/8956702/6a4e66a4de16/41598_2022_9037_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eec/8956702/d285e7bb3927/41598_2022_9037_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eec/8956702/f3cbf099842c/41598_2022_9037_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eec/8956702/7f06f41e9a87/41598_2022_9037_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eec/8956702/6a4e66a4de16/41598_2022_9037_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eec/8956702/d285e7bb3927/41598_2022_9037_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of risk perceptions on close contact frequency during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.新冠疫情期间风险认知对密切接触频率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 25;12(1):5192. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09037-8.
2
The influence of COVID-19 risk perception and vaccination status on the number of social contacts across Europe: insights from the CoMix study.新冠疫情风险感知和疫苗接种状况对欧洲社会接触人数的影响:来自 CoMix 研究的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):1350. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16252-z.
3
Effect of risk status for severe COVID-19 on individual contact behaviour during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2020/2021-an analysis based on the German COVIMOD study.2020/2021 年 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间严重 COVID-19 风险状况对个体接触行为的影响——基于德国 COVIMOD 研究的分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08175-2.
4
Seroprevalence of Unidentified SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Hong Kong During 3 Pandemic Waves.香港 3 波新冠疫情期间不明 SARS-CoV-2 感染的血清流行率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2132923. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32923.
5
Social contact patterns following the COVID-19 pandemic: a snapshot of post-pandemic behaviour from the CoMix study.新冠肺炎疫情后的社会接触模式:CoMix 研究对疫情后行为的快照分析。
Epidemics. 2024 Sep;48:100778. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100778. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
6
Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.利用快速在线调查评估传染病暴发期间人们的认知:一项关于新冠肺炎的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e18790. doi: 10.2196/18790.
7
Social mixing and risk exposures for SARS-CoV-2 infections in elderly persons.老年人中 SARS-CoV-2 感染的社交混合和风险暴露。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Dec 5;150:w20416. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20416. eCollection 2020 Nov 30.
8
Longitudinal social contacts among school-aged children during the COVID-19 pandemic: the Bay Area Contacts among Kids (BACK) study.新冠疫情期间学龄儿童的纵向社会接触:湾区儿童接触研究(BACK 研究)。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 10;22(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07218-4.
9
Differential impact of physical distancing strategies on social contacts relevant for the spread of SARS-CoV-2: evidence from a cross-national online survey, March-April 2020.物理距离策略对 SARS-CoV-2 传播相关社交接触的影响差异:来自 2020 年 3 月至 4 月跨国在线调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 21;11(10):e050651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050651.
10
COVID-19 on the Nile: Review on the Management and Outcomes of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Arab Republic of Egypt from February to August 2020.尼罗河畔的 COVID-19:2020 年 2 月至 8 月期间埃及阿拉伯共和国 COVID-19 大流行的管理和结果综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 8;18(4):1588. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041588.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the interplay between epidemiological and social cognitve drivers of behaviour change during the Covid-19 pandemic.了解新冠疫情期间行为改变的流行病学和社会认知驱动因素之间的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30556. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14644-2.
2
Back to the future? Drastic drop in serotype 19A carriage in daycare centers within two years after a second switch to PCV13 in Belgium.回到过去?比利时再次改用PCV13两年内,日托中心19A血清型携带率急剧下降。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2484886. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2484886. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
3
Autonomous and policy-induced behavior change during the COVID-19 pandemic: Towards understanding and modeling the interplay of behavioral adaptation.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in social contacts in England during the COVID-19 pandemic between March 2020 and March 2021 as measured by the CoMix survey: A repeated cross-sectional study.2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月期间,通过 CoMix 调查衡量的英格兰在 COVID-19 大流行期间社会接触的变化:一项重复横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Mar 1;19(3):e1003907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003907. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
COVID-19 mortality, excess mortality, deaths per million and infection fatality ratio, Belgium, 9 March 2020 to 28 June 2020.2020 年 3 月 9 日至 2020 年 6 月 28 日期间,比利时的 COVID-19 死亡率、超额死亡率、每百万人死亡数和感染病死率。
Euro Surveill. 2022 Feb;27(7). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.7.2002060.
3
自主行为改变和政策干预下的 COVID-19 大流行期间行为改变:理解和建模行为适应的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2024 May 2;19(5):e0296145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296145. eCollection 2024.
4
Understanding the role of risk preferences and perceptions in vaccination decisions and post-vaccination behaviors among U.S. households.了解风险偏好和认知在美国家庭中的疫苗接种决策和接种后行为中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 7;14(1):3190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52408-6.
5
Changes in symptoms and characteristics of COVID-19 patients across different variants: two years study using neural network analysis.不同变异株 COVID-19 患者症状和特征的变化:使用神经网络分析的两年研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 28;23(1):838. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08813-9.
6
Associations between COVID-19 Risk Perceptions and Mental Health, Wellbeing, and Risk Behaviours.2019冠状病毒病风险认知与心理健康、幸福感及风险行为之间的关联
J Risk Res. 2022 Dec 2;25(11-12):1372-1394. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2022.2127849. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
7
U.S. College Students' Sexual Risk Behaviors Before and During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.美国大学生在新冠疫情早期前后的性行为风险。
J Sex Res. 2024 May-Jun;61(5):750-766. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2023.2246160. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
8
The influence of COVID-19 risk perception and vaccination status on the number of social contacts across Europe: insights from the CoMix study.新冠疫情风险感知和疫苗接种状况对欧洲社会接触人数的影响:来自 CoMix 研究的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):1350. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16252-z.
9
Longitudinal social contact data analysis: insights from 2 years of data collection in Belgium during the COVID-19 pandemic.纵向社会接触数据分析:COVID-19 大流行期间在比利时进行 2 年数据收集的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):1298. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16193-7.
10
Experiences of being at high-risk during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on emotional well-being and daily life in people with chronic conditions: a qualitative study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间处于高风险之中的体验及其对慢性病患者的情绪健康和日常生活的影响:一项定性研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Jul 5;7(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00607-6.
SOCRATES-CoMix: a platform for timely and open-source contact mixing data during and in between COVID-19 surges and interventions in over 20 European countries.
SOCRATES-CoMix:一个平台,用于在 20 多个欧洲国家的 COVID-19 疫情期间和疫情之间及时提供开源接触混合数据和干预措施。
BMC Med. 2021 Sep 29;19(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02133-y.
4
More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 的 50 多种长期影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 9;11(1):16144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95565-8.
5
Close contact infection dynamics over time: insights from a second large-scale social contact survey in Flanders, Belgium, in 2010-2011.随时间推移的密切接触者感染动态:来自 2010-2011 年比利时弗兰德斯地区第二次大规模社会接触调查的见解。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 18;21(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05949-4.
6
The Moderating Effects of Perceived Severity on the Generational Gap in Preventive Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the U.S.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间,感知严重性对代际预防行为差距的调节作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2011. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042011.
7
Comparing Public Perceptions and Preventive Behaviors During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional Survey Study.比较 COVID-19 大流行早期香港和英国的公众认知和预防行为:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):e23231. doi: 10.2196/23231.
8
CoMix: comparing mixing patterns in the Belgian population during and after lockdown.混合:比较封锁期间和之后比利时人群的混合模式。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 14;10(1):21885. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78540-7.
9
Optimistic bias and preventive behavioral engagement in the context of COVID-19.新冠疫情背景下的乐观偏差与预防性行为参与。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Jan;17(1):1859-1866. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
10
The impacts of knowledge, risk perception, emotion and information on citizens' protective behaviors during the outbreak of COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China.在 COVID-19 爆发期间,知识、风险感知、情绪和信息对公民防护行为的影响:一项在中国的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):1751. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09892-y.