Radovanović Mirjana, Filipović Sanja, Vukadinović Simonida, Trbojević Milovan, Podbregar Iztok
Faculty of Security Studies, Educons University, Vojvode Putnika 87, Sremska Kamenica, 21208 Republic of Serbia.
Institute of Social Sciences, Singidunum University, Danijelova 32, Belgrade, 11000 Republic of Serbia.
Energy Sustain Soc. 2022;12(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13705-022-00342-8. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
Decarbonisation of the European economy is one of the main strategic goals of energy transition in the European Union (EU), which aims to become a leader in this process by 2050 and to include other European countries making thus the European continent the first carbon neutral region in the world. Although decarbonisation is an important goal of the EU, the models for monitoring the progress of this process have not yet been clearly defined, and views on the social, economic, and security implications in terms of prioritising decarbonisation are conflicting. The main objective of this paper is to determine the methodological correctness of the existing method of decarbonisation monitoring, to develop a new monitoring model indicating the differences in the EU and European countries that are non-EU and to point out the underlying social, economic and security implications that must certainly find their place in the decision-making process in this field.
The main results showed that there is no clearly defined model for monitoring the success of decarbonisation, while the indicators that are commonly used for this purpose make a model that, as the analysis shows-is methodologically incorrect. In the case of EU countries, the following indicators proved to be the most reliable: and . For non-EU countries, the best monitoring indicators are , , and . These indicators can explain 99% of the variance in decarbonisation success.
The basic conclusion of the paper is that even before the implementation, the decarbonisation monitoring model should be defined and methodologically tested, and the use of a single model for all EU countries or for all countries is not recommended. It is proposed to simplify the monitoring model, with an emphasis on monitoring of , which proved to be the most efficient in all sampled countries. The current method of monitoring is based exclusively on environmentally related indicators while ignoring the fact that decarbonisation is associated with almost all aspects of development. The additional social, economic and security aspects need to be developed and included in the further monitoring process.
欧洲经济脱碳是欧盟能源转型的主要战略目标之一,欧盟旨在到2050年成为这一进程的领导者,并带动其他欧洲国家,使欧洲大陆成为世界上首个碳中和地区。尽管脱碳是欧盟的重要目标,但监测这一进程进展的模式尚未明确界定,而且在优先考虑脱碳方面对社会、经济和安全影响的看法存在冲突。本文的主要目的是确定现有脱碳监测方法在方法上的正确性,开发一种新的监测模型,以表明欧盟国家与非欧盟欧洲国家之间的差异,并指出必然会在该领域决策过程中占据一席之地的潜在社会、经济和安全影响。
主要结果表明,目前尚无明确界定的监测脱碳成功与否的模型,而为此目的常用的指标所构成的模型,经分析在方法上是不正确的。就欧盟国家而言,以下指标被证明是最可靠的:……和……。对于非欧盟国家,最佳监测指标是……、……和……。这些指标可以解释脱碳成功差异的99%。
本文的基本结论是,即使在实施之前,也应界定脱碳监测模型并进行方法测试,不建议对所有欧盟国家或所有国家使用单一模型。建议简化监测模型,重点监测……,事实证明该指标在所有抽样国家中效率最高。目前的监测方法完全基于与环境相关的指标,却忽略了脱碳几乎与发展的所有方面都相关这一事实。需要拓展额外的社会、经济和安全方面,并将其纳入进一步的监测过程中