• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

追踪超级传播者接触者的集中检测。

Pooled testing of traced contacts under superspreading dynamics.

机构信息

Μax Planck Institute for Software Systems, Kaiserslautern, Germany.

ΙIT Bombay, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Mar 28;18(3):e1010008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010008. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010008
PMID:35344547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8989305/
Abstract

Testing is recommended for all close contacts of confirmed COVID-19 patients. However, existing pooled testing methods are oblivious to the circumstances of contagion provided by contact tracing. Here, we build upon a well-known semi-adaptive pooled testing method, Dorfman's method with imperfect tests, and derive a simple pooled testing method based on dynamic programming that is specifically designed to use information provided by contact tracing. Experiments using a variety of reproduction numbers and dispersion levels, including those estimated in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, show that the pools found using our method result in a significantly lower number of tests than those found using Dorfman's method. Our method provides the greatest competitive advantage when the number of contacts of an infected individual is small, or the distribution of secondary infections is highly overdispersed. Moreover, it maintains this competitive advantage under imperfect contact tracing and significant levels of dilution.

摘要

建议对所有确诊 COVID-19 患者的密切接触者进行检测。然而,现有的集中检测方法忽略了接触者追踪提供的感染情况。在这里,我们基于一种著名的半自适应集中检测方法——存在不完美检测的 Dorfman 方法,通过动态规划推导出一种简单的集中检测方法,专门用于利用接触者追踪提供的信息。使用各种繁殖数量和分散水平(包括在 COVID-19 大流行背景下估计的数量)进行的实验表明,使用我们的方法找到的集中检测数量明显少于使用 Dorfman 方法找到的集中检测数量。当感染者的接触者数量较少或二次感染的分布高度过分散时,我们的方法提供了最大的竞争优势。此外,它在不完美的接触者追踪和显著的稀释水平下保持了这种竞争优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/8989305/51a21fe87ced/pcbi.1010008.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/8989305/d2b052e9107f/pcbi.1010008.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/8989305/2d4a8650689c/pcbi.1010008.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/8989305/142a56f557e1/pcbi.1010008.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/8989305/c8232e59f449/pcbi.1010008.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/8989305/51a21fe87ced/pcbi.1010008.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/8989305/d2b052e9107f/pcbi.1010008.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/8989305/2d4a8650689c/pcbi.1010008.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/8989305/142a56f557e1/pcbi.1010008.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/8989305/c8232e59f449/pcbi.1010008.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/8989305/51a21fe87ced/pcbi.1010008.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Pooled testing of traced contacts under superspreading dynamics.追踪超级传播者接触者的集中检测。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Mar 28;18(3):e1010008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010008. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.新冠疫情背景下接触者追踪干预措施的效果比较:系统评价。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;38(3):243-266. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00963-z. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
3
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.隔离、检测、接触者追踪和保持社交距离在不同环境下减少 SARS-CoV-2 传播的效果:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151-1160. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
4
Determining the optimal strategy for reopening schools, the impact of test and trace interventions, and the risk of occurrence of a second COVID-19 epidemic wave in the UK: a modelling study.确定英国学校重新开放的最佳策略、检测和追踪干预措施的影响,以及发生第二波 COVID-19 疫情的风险:一项建模研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30250-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
5
Nationwide rollout reveals efficacy of epidemic control through digital contact tracing.全国范围内的推广显示了数字接触者追踪在疫情防控方面的有效性。
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 11;12(1):5918. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26144-8.
6
Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study.新冠病毒接触者追踪策略有效性延迟的影响:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e452-e459. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30157-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
Stochastic sampling effects favor manual over digital contact tracing.随机抽样效应有利于人工而非数字接触者追踪。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 26;12(1):1919. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22082-7.
8
Overdispersion in COVID-19 increases the effectiveness of limiting nonrepetitive contacts for transmission control.在 COVID-19 中,过度分散增加了限制非重复接触以控制传播的效果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 6;118(14). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016623118.
9
Effectiveness evaluation of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州数字接触者追踪在 COVID-19 中的效果评估。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e250-e258. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00010-X. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
10
Early chains of transmission of COVID-19 in France, January to March 2020.2020 年 1 月至 3 月法国 COVID-19 的早期传播链。
Euro Surveill. 2022 Feb;27(6). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.6.2001953.

本文引用的文献

1
Positively Correlated Samples Save Pooled Testing Costs.正相关样本可节省混合检测成本。
IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng. 2021 May 20;8(3):2170-2182. doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2021.3081759. eCollection 2021 Jul 1.
2
Covasim: An agent-based model of COVID-19 dynamics and interventions.Covasim:一种基于代理的 COVID-19 动力学和干预措施模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jul 26;17(7):e1009149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009149. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
OpenABM-Covid19-An agent-based model for non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 including contact tracing.
OpenABM-Covid19-一种针对包括接触者追踪在内的 COVID-19 的非药物干预措施的基于代理的模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jul 12;17(7):e1009146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009146. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
Lessons from countries implementing find, test, trace, isolation and support policies in the rapid response of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.从实施“发现、检测、追踪、隔离和支持”政策的国家吸取的经验教训:COVID-19 大流行快速反应的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(7):e047832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047832.
5
Is group testing ready for prime-time in disease identification?群体检测是否已经准备好用于疾病识别的黄金时间?
Stat Med. 2021 Jul 30;40(17):3865-3880. doi: 10.1002/sim.9003. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
6
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原和基于分子的检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2.
7
The impact of contact tracing and household bubbles on deconfinement strategies for COVID-19.接触者追踪和家庭隔离对 COVID-19 解除隔离策略的影响。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 9;12(1):1524. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21747-7.
8
Assessing the feasibility and effectiveness of household-pooled universal testing to control COVID-19 epidemics.评估家庭聚集性普遍检测控制 COVID-19 疫情的可行性和效果。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 9;17(3):e1008688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008688. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
The challenges of containing SARS-CoV-2 via test-trace-and-isolate.通过检测-追踪-隔离来控制 SARS-CoV-2 面临的挑战。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 15;12(1):378. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20699-8.
10
Superspreading in early transmissions of COVID-19 in Indonesia.印尼 COVID-19 早期传播中的超级传播事件。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 28;10(1):22386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79352-5.