• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字干预措施对行为健康的感知益处:定性访谈研究。

The Perceived Benefits of Digital Interventions for Behavioral Health: Qualitative Interview Study.

机构信息

School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Biology and the Division of Public Health, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 30;24(3):e34300. doi: 10.2196/34300.

DOI:10.2196/34300
PMID:35353045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9008533/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital interventions have gained momentum in terms of behavioral health. However, owing to lacking standard approaches or tools for creating digital behavioral interventions, clinical researchers follow widely varying conceptions of how best to go about digital intervention development. Researchers also face significant cost-, time-, and expertise-related challenges in digital intervention development. Improving the availability of tools and guidance for researchers will require a thorough understanding of the motivations and needs of researchers seeking to create digital interventions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to understand the perceptions of behavioral researchers toward digital interventions, and inform the use of these interventions, by documenting the reasons why researchers are increasingly focusing their efforts on digital interventions and their perspectives on the perceived benefits that digital approaches can provide for researchers and intervention recipients.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with 18 researchers who had experience designing digital behavioral interventions or running studies with them. A convenience sample of interviewees was recruited from among users of the Computerized Intervention Authoring System platform, a web-based tool that facilitates the process of creating and deploying digital interventions in behavioral research. Interviews were conducted over teleconference between February and April 2020. Recordings from the interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed by multiple coders.

RESULTS

Interviews were completed with 18 individuals and lasted between 24 and 65 (mean 46.9, SD 11.3) minutes. Interviewees were predominantly female (17/18, 94%) and represented different job roles, ranging from researcher to project or study staff. Four major themes came out of the interviews concerning the benefits of digital interventions for behavioral health: convenience and flexibility for interventionists and recipients, support for implementing evidence-based interventions with fidelity, scaling and improving access to interventions, and getting a foot in the door despite stigma and disenfranchisement.

CONCLUSIONS

Interviewees described a number of important potential benefits of digital interventions, particularly with respect to scientific rigor, scalability, and overcoming barriers to reaching more people. There are complex considerations with regard to translating behavior change strategies into digital forms of delivery, and interventionists make individual, sometimes unexpected, choices with minimal evidence of their relative effectiveness. Future research should investigate how behavioral researchers can be supported in making these choices toward usability, ease of access, and approachability of digital interventions. Our study underscores the need for authoring platforms that can facilitate the process of creating and deploying digital interventions to reach their full potential for interventionists and recipients alike.

摘要

背景

数字干预措施在行为健康方面发展势头强劲。然而,由于缺乏创建数字行为干预措施的标准方法或工具,临床研究人员对于如何最好地开展数字干预措施的开发有着广泛不同的理解。研究人员在开发数字干预措施方面还面临着成本、时间和专业知识相关的重大挑战。为了提高研究人员可用的工具和指导,需要深入了解寻求创建数字干预措施的研究人员的动机和需求。

目的

本研究旨在通过记录研究人员越来越关注数字干预措施的原因,以及他们对数字方法可以为研究人员和干预措施接受者提供的益处的看法,了解行为研究人员对数字干预措施的看法,并为其提供信息。

方法

我们对 18 名有设计数字行为干预措施或使用数字行为干预措施开展研究经验的研究人员进行了半结构式定性访谈。通过计算机化干预创作系统平台的用户中进行了便利抽样,该平台是一个基于网络的工具,可简化数字干预措施的创建和部署过程。访谈于 2020 年 2 月至 4 月期间通过电话会议进行。对访谈的录音进行了转录,并由多名编码员进行了主题分析。

结果

完成了 18 名个人的访谈,持续时间为 24 至 65 分钟(平均 46.9 分钟,SD 11.3)。受访者主要为女性(17/18,94%),代表不同的工作角色,从研究人员到项目或研究人员。访谈中出现了四个关于数字干预措施对行为健康的益处的主要主题:干预者和接受者的方便和灵活性、支持以保真度实施基于证据的干预措施、扩大和改善干预措施的可及性、以及尽管存在耻辱感和排斥感,但仍能入门。

结论

受访者描述了数字干预措施的一些重要潜在益处,特别是在科学严谨性、可扩展性和克服接触更多人群的障碍方面。将行为改变策略转化为数字形式的交付方式存在复杂的考虑因素,干预者会根据其相对有效性做出个人的、有时出乎意料的选择。未来的研究应调查如何支持行为研究人员做出可用性、易于访问和数字干预措施的可接近性方面的选择。我们的研究强调了需要有创作平台来促进数字干预措施的创建和部署,以充分发挥其对干预者和接受者的潜力。

相似文献

1
The Perceived Benefits of Digital Interventions for Behavioral Health: Qualitative Interview Study.数字干预措施对行为健康的感知益处:定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 30;24(3):e34300. doi: 10.2196/34300.
2
Barriers and Considerations in the Design and Implementation of Digital Behavioral Interventions: Qualitative Analysis.数字行为干预措施设计和实施中的障碍和考虑因素:定性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 30;24(3):e34301. doi: 10.2196/34301.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Making Sense of Theories, Models, and Frameworks in Digital Health Behavior Change Design: Qualitative Descriptive Study.在数字健康行为改变设计中理解理论、模型和框架:定性描述性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 15;25:e45095. doi: 10.2196/45095.
5
Understanding Users' Experiences of a Novel Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Platform for Depression and Anxiety: Qualitative Interviews From Pilot Trial Participants.了解用户对新型抑郁症和焦虑症网络认知行为疗法平台的体验:来自试点试验参与者的定性访谈
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 20;7:e46062. doi: 10.2196/46062.
6
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
7
Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis.数字心理教育和同伴支持干预(COPe-support)的可接受性和体验:对支持精神病患者的照顾者的访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e27781. doi: 10.2196/27781.
8
Approaches for implementing digital interventions for alcohol use disorders in primary care: A qualitative, user-centered design study.在初级保健中实施酒精使用障碍数字干预措施的方法:一项以用户为中心的定性设计研究。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Nov 4;3:26334895221135264. doi: 10.1177/26334895221135264. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Remote Digital Psychiatry for Mobile Mental Health Assessment and Therapy: MindLogger Platform Development Study.远程数字精神病学用于移动心理健康评估和治疗:MindLogger 平台开发研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 11;23(11):e22369. doi: 10.2196/22369.
10
Evaluation of Two Mobile Health Apps in the Context of Smoking Cessation: Qualitative Study of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Versus Non-CBT-Based Digital Solutions.在戒烟背景下对两款移动健康应用程序的评估:认知行为疗法(CBT)与非基于CBT的数字解决方案的定性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 18;6(4):e98. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9405.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of online sleep education interventions for college students: A systematic review.针对大学生的在线睡眠教育干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述。
Am J Health Educ. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2025.2529798.
2
Social-Media-Based Mental Health Interventions: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.基于社交媒体的心理健康干预措施:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e67953. doi: 10.2196/67953.
3
Effects of digital interventions on neuroplasticity and brain function of individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review.数字干预对发育障碍个体神经可塑性和脑功能的影响:一项系统综述。
Internet Interv. 2025 Jul 2;41:100850. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100850. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Integration of a smartphone app with posttraumatic stress disorder treatment for frontline workers: a pilot study.一款智能手机应用程序与一线工作者创伤后应激障碍治疗的整合:一项试点研究。
Aust J Psychol. 2024 Sep 9;76(1):2399112. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2024.2399112. eCollection 2024.
5
Digital versus nondigital behavioral interventions on cardiovascular risk reduction: systematic review and meta-analysis.数字与非数字行为干预对心血管风险降低的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf043.
6
Digital Behavior Change Interventions to Promote Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Behavior Among Survivors of Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.促进乳腺癌幸存者身体活动和减少久坐行为的数字行为改变干预措施:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 19;27:e65278. doi: 10.2196/65278.
7
The younger women's wellness after cancer program: results from feasibility testing in Aotearoa New Zealand (the 'Kōwhai study').年轻女性癌症康复后健康计划:新西兰奥特亚罗瓦可行性测试结果(“科怀研究”)
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 5;33(7):546. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09601-8.
8
Low-Burden Electronic Health Record Strategies for Engaging Oncologists in Digital Health Behavior Change Interventions: Qualitative Interview Study.让肿瘤学家参与数字健康行为改变干预的低负担电子健康记录策略:定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 30;27:e65975. doi: 10.2196/65975.
9
Digital Sexual Health Education for Young Adults (18-35 Years): A Scoping Review Protocol.针对年轻人(18 - 35岁)的数字性健康教育培训:一项范围综述方案
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;8(5):e70738. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70738. eCollection 2025 May.
10
Using the Healthy Native Youth Implementation Toolbox to Provide Web-Based Adolescent Health Promotion Decision Support to American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: Implementation Study.使用《健康本土青年实施工具箱》为美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区提供基于网络的青少年健康促进决策支持:实施研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 16;9:e67885. doi: 10.2196/67885.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and Considerations in the Design and Implementation of Digital Behavioral Interventions: Qualitative Analysis.数字行为干预措施设计和实施中的障碍和考虑因素:定性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 30;24(3):e34301. doi: 10.2196/34301.
2
Experience Sampling and Programmed Intervention Method and System for Planning, Authoring, and Deploying Mobile Health Interventions: Design and Case Reports.体验采样和编程干预方法和系统,用于规划、创作和部署移动健康干预措施:设计和案例报告。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 12;23(7):e24278. doi: 10.2196/24278.
3
Developing an Adaptive Mobile Intervention to Address Risky Substance Use Among Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Usability Study.开发自适应移动干预措施以解决青少年和刚成年期人群的危险物质使用问题:可用性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 15;9(1):e24424. doi: 10.2196/24424.
4
Computer- vs. nurse practitioner-delivered brief intervention for adolescent marijuana, alcohol, and sex risk behaviors in school-based health centers.计算机辅助 vs. 护士从业者提供的青少年在学校健康中心中涉及大麻、酒精和性行为风险行为的简短干预。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 1;218:108423. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108423. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
5
Perspectives of e-health interventions for treating and preventing eating disorders: descriptive study of perceived advantages and barriers, help-seeking intentions, and preferred functionality.电子健康干预治疗和预防进食障碍的观点:对感知到的优势和障碍、寻求帮助的意愿以及首选功能的描述性研究。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 May;26(4):1097-1109. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-01005-3. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
6
Abstinence outcomes among women in reproductive health centers administered clinician or electronic brief interventions.在生殖健康中心接受临床医生或电子简短干预措施的女性中的禁欲结果。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Jun;113:107995. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
E-Sexual Health: A Position Statement of the European Society for Sexual Medicine.电子性健康:欧洲性医学学会立场声明。
J Sex Med. 2020 Jul;17(7):1246-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
8
Developing Digital Media to Destigmatize Emergency Department Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Among Sexual and Racial Minority Youth: A Hyper-iterative Methodology.开发数字媒体以消除性少数和种族少数青年急诊科人类免疫缺陷病毒检测的污名化:一种超迭代方法。
Cureus. 2020 Mar 8;12(3):e7209. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7209.
9
Adolescent Substance Use Disorder Treatment: an Update on Evidence-Based Strategies.青少年物质使用障碍治疗:基于证据的策略更新。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Sep 14;21(10):96. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1086-0.
10
The Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Systematic Review.数字健康干预措施对心血管疾病管理的成本效益:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 17;21(6):e13166. doi: 10.2196/13166.