Suppr超能文献

文本物质性、可供性与阅读研究中的身体转向

Text Materialities, Affordances, and the Embodied Turn in the Study of Reading.

作者信息

Hillesund Terje, Schilhab Theresa, Mangen Anne

机构信息

Department of Media and Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

Center for Future Technologies, Culture and Learning, Danish School of Education, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 14;13:827058. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827058. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Digital texts have for decades been a challenge for reading research, creating a range of questions about reading and a need for new theories and concepts. In this paper, we focus on materialities of texts and suggest an embodied, enacted, and extended approach to the research on digital reading. We refer to findings showing that cognitive activities in reading are grounded in bodily and social experiences, and we explore the cognitive role of the body in reading, claiming that-influenced by tacit knowledge and the task at hand-textual meaning is enacted through a mental physical engagement with text. Further, applying the concept of affordances, we examine how digital technologies have induced new ways of physically handling and mentally interpreting text, indicating that brain, body, text, and technologies are integrated parts of an extended process of reading. The aim of the paper is to encourage empirical research on the interplay between body (including brain), text, and text materialities, a focus we argue will deepen our understand of the current transformation of reading.

摘要

几十年来,数字文本一直是阅读研究面临的一个挑战,引发了一系列关于阅读的问题,并催生了对新理论和概念的需求。在本文中,我们关注文本的物质性,并提出一种具身化、实践化和扩展化的方法来研究数字阅读。我们提及的研究结果表明,阅读中的认知活动基于身体和社会经验,我们探讨身体在阅读中的认知作用,认为受隐性知识和手头任务的影响,文本意义是通过与文本的身心互动而产生的。此外,运用可供性的概念,我们研究数字技术如何引发了身体处理文本和心理解读文本的新方式,表明大脑、身体、文本和技术是阅读扩展过程中相互整合的部分。本文的目的是鼓励对身体(包括大脑)、文本和文本物质性之间的相互作用进行实证研究,我们认为这一关注点将加深我们对当前阅读变革的理解。

相似文献

6
Revisited: Postphenomenology and Material Engagement Theory.再探:后现象学与物质参与理论。
Philos Technol. 2019;32(2):195-214. doi: 10.1007/s13347-018-0321-7. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
8
Social affordances and the possibility of ecological linguistics.社会可供性与生态语言学的可能性。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2009 Dec;43(4):356-73. doi: 10.1007/s12124-009-9097-8.
10
Fracturing the affordance space: an account of digitalized alienation.打破可供性空间:关于数字化异化的一种阐释
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 3;15:1407586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1407586. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Reading: How Readers Beget Imagining.阅读:读者如何引发想象。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:531682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531682. eCollection 2020.
5
Is the brain prewired for letters?大脑是否预先设定了对字母的识别?
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Aug 26;19(9):1192-3. doi: 10.1038/nn.4369.
6
Grounding meaning in experience: A broad perspective on embodied language.体验中的意义基础:具身语言的广阔视角
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Oct;69:69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.033. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
10
Perceptual simulation in developing language comprehension.发展中的语言理解中的知觉模拟。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Dec;110(4):659-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验