• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术阅读(与写作)及影响因子的影响力:一项关于分布式认知与学术习惯的研究

Scholarly reading (and writing) and the power of impact factors: a study of distributed cognition and intellectual habits.

作者信息

Hillesund Terje

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 17;14:1165700. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165700. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165700
PMID:37529313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10389269/
Abstract

Using observational interviews and introducing theories of embodied and distributed cognition, this study examines the scholarly reading and the intellectual habits of a group of social scientists. All participants were working at universities in task environments dominated by digital artifacts and technologies. The study found a strong connection between scholarly reading and the scholars' writing processes and a further coupling to their digital publishing activity. While examining the participants' print and online reading, it turned out that their reading was so tightly coupled to their writing that this entanglement had to be at the core of the analysis. In the study, scholarly reading and writing are analyzed as cognitive processes that extend beyond the brain and body and comprise cognitive artifacts of texts and their material bearers, such as printouts, digital displays, computers, and the Internet. In the process of creating text-or reading writing-brains, bodies, and artifacts are considered to be dynamically coupled in a distributed cognitive process. Based on interviews with a sample of academics, the study analyses how their scholarly reading relates to the other elements in such an extended process and how they utilize the affordances of cognitive digital artifacts in their creative and intellectual endeavors.

摘要

本研究运用观察性访谈并引入具身认知和分布式认知理论,考察了一组社会科学家的学术阅读和学术习惯。所有参与者都在以数字制品和技术为主导的任务环境中在大学工作。研究发现学术阅读与学者的写作过程之间存在紧密联系,且与他们的数字出版活动进一步相关联。在考察参与者的纸质阅读和在线阅读时,结果发现他们的阅读与写作紧密相连,以至于这种交织必须成为分析的核心。在该研究中,学术阅读和写作被分析为超越大脑和身体的认知过程,包括文本及其物质载体(如打印件、数字显示屏、计算机和互联网)等认知制品。在创作文本或阅读写作的过程中,大脑、身体和制品被认为在分布式认知过程中动态耦合。基于对一组学者样本的访谈,该研究分析了他们的学术阅读在这样一个扩展过程中如何与其他要素相关联,以及他们在创造性和学术活动中如何利用认知数字制品的特性。

相似文献

1
Scholarly reading (and writing) and the power of impact factors: a study of distributed cognition and intellectual habits.学术阅读(与写作)及影响因子的影响力:一项关于分布式认知与学术习惯的研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 17;14:1165700. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165700. eCollection 2023.
2
Text Materialities, Affordances, and the Embodied Turn in the Study of Reading.文本物质性、可供性与阅读研究中的身体转向
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 14;13:827058. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827058. eCollection 2022.
3
Attitudes toward text recycling in academic writing across disciplines.跨学科视角下学术写作中对文本再利用的态度
Account Res. 2018;25(3):142-169. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1434622. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
4
Exploring Relationships Between L2 Chinese Character Writing and Reading Acquisition From Embodied Cognitive Perspectives: Evidence From HSK Big Data.从具身认知视角探索第二语言汉字书写与阅读习得之间的关系:来自汉语水平考试大数据的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;12:779190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.779190. eCollection 2021.
5
Promoting nursing research globally: the writing to improve nursing science (WINS) program.促进全球护理研究:提升护理科学写作(WINS)计划。
Int Nurs Rev. 2019 Dec;66(4):541-548. doi: 10.1111/inr.12552. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
6
Handwriting or Typewriting? The Influence of Pen- or Keyboard-Based Writing Training on Reading and Writing Performance in Preschool Children.手写还是打字?基于笔或键盘的书写训练对学龄前儿童读写能力的影响。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2015 Dec 31;11(4):136-46. doi: 10.5709/acp-0178-7. eCollection 2015.
7
Using a digital spelling aid to improve writing in persons with post-stroke aphasia: An intervention study.使用数字拼写辅助工具改善中风后失语症患者的写作能力:一项干预研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Mar;57(2):303-323. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12696. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
8
Does the frequency of reading and writing habits contribute to executive functions, intelligence, and learning in adolescents with healthy development?阅读和写作习惯的频率是否有助于发育正常的青少年的执行功能、智力和学习?
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2023 Jan-Mar;12(1):34-44. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2022.2026222. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
9
Reading digital- versus print-easy texts: a study with university students who prefer digital sources.阅读数字版与印刷版的简易文本:一项针对偏好数字资源的大学生的研究。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2022 May 6;35(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41155-022-00212-4.
10
Exploring factors associated with scholarly writing among US pharmacy practice faculty.探究与美国药学实践教师学术写作相关的因素。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Mar;17(3):531-540. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.04.025. Epub 2020 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Text Materialities, Affordances, and the Embodied Turn in the Study of Reading.文本物质性、可供性与阅读研究中的身体转向
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 14;13:827058. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827058. eCollection 2022.
2
Reading: How Readers Beget Imagining.阅读:读者如何引发想象。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:531682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531682. eCollection 2020.
3
Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story?比较纸质书和Kindle上阅读长文本的理解情况:在文本的何处以及故事的何时?
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 15;10:38. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038. eCollection 2019.
4
Perceptual simulation in developing language comprehension.发展中的语言理解中的知觉模拟。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Dec;110(4):659-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
5
The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge.大脑的概念:感觉运动系统在概念知识中的作用。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005 May;22(3):455-79. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000310.
6
Embodied semantics for actions: findings from functional brain imaging.
J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.012. Epub 2008 Mar 29.
7
Brain mechanisms linking language and action.连接语言与行动的脑机制。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Jul;6(7):576-82. doi: 10.1038/nrn1706.
8
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.关于视觉与视觉意识的感觉运动解释。
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):939-73; discussion 973-1031. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x01000115.