• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发起针对 WEIRD 心理学的科学革命的认识论策略。

An Epistemological Strategy for Initiating Scientific Revolution against WEIRD Psychology.

机构信息

Research Center for Cultural China, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2023 Jun;57(2):361-380. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09681-9. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-022-09681-9
PMID:35364804
Abstract

This paper, a reply to the thought-provoking paper The WEIRDest People in the World? (Henrich, Heine & Norenzayan, 2010), makes the fundamental argument that most research paradigms from Western mainstream psychology, including theories, methods, and research procedures, are all very WEIRD once moved to non-Western cultures. We thus face not only biased samples but also a deeply WEIRD psychology. Implanting such a research paradigm into non-Western societies may result in an episteme of self-colonization by formulating a mentality of normative Eurocentrism, which may hinder not only the understanding of a local culture. Through this paper I draw on Kuhn's (1962) Structure of Scientific Revolutions to argue that a crisis is needed to initiate a scientific revolution against WEIRD psychology. I then draw on Hwang's (2019a) epistemological strategy as a path for constructing culture-inclusive theories to compliment Western theories found in mainstream psychology.

摘要

这篇论文是对发人深省的论文《世界上最奇特的人?》(Henrich、Heine 和 Norenzayan,2010)的回应,其基本观点是,包括理论、方法和研究程序在内的大多数来自西方主流心理学的研究范式,一旦被应用到非西方文化中,都是非常奇特的。因此,我们不仅面临有偏差的样本,还有一种深深根植于奇特心理学的观念。将这种研究范式植入非西方社会,可能会导致一种自我殖民的知识体系,通过形成一种规范的欧洲中心主义心态,不仅会阻碍对当地文化的理解,还会阻碍对西方文化的理解。通过本文,我借鉴库恩(1962)的《科学革命的结构》来论证,需要一场危机来引发一场针对奇特心理学的科学革命。然后,我借鉴黄氏(2019a)的认识论策略作为构建包含文化的理论的途径,以补充主流心理学中的西方理论。

相似文献

1
An Epistemological Strategy for Initiating Scientific Revolution against WEIRD Psychology.发起针对 WEIRD 心理学的科学革命的认识论策略。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2023 Jun;57(2):361-380. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09681-9. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
2
Liberals think more analytically (more "WEIRD") than conservatives.自由主义者比保守主义者更善于进行分析性思考(更具“西方、受过良好教育、工业化、富有、民主”的特点)。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Feb;41(2):250-67. doi: 10.1177/0146167214563672. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
3
WEIRD-Confucian comparisons: Ongoing cultural biases in psychology's evidence base and some recommendations for improving global representation.怪异与儒家的比较:心理学证据基础中持续存在的文化偏见以及改善全球代表性的一些建议。
Am Psychol. 2025 Feb-Mar;80(2):247-263. doi: 10.1037/amp0001298. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
4
[Kuhn's paradigm concept and the paradigm development model of nursing knowledge].[库恩的范式概念与护理知识的范式发展模型]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2008 Feb;55(1):63-9.
5
Was there a Darwinian Revolution? Yes, no, and maybe!是否存在一场达尔文式的革命?是,否,也许吧!
Endeavour. 2014 Sep-Dec;38(3-4):159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
6
Accelerating the science and practice of psychology beyond WEIRD biases: Enriching the landscape through Asian psychology.超越“怪异”偏见,加速心理学的科学与实践:通过亚洲心理学丰富研究版图。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1054519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1054519. eCollection 2022.
7
Weirdness is in the eye of the beholder.怪异在旁观者眼中。
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):85-6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1000004X. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
8
The weirdest brains in the world.世界上最奇特的大脑。
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):88-90. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000282. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
9
Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions between sociology and epistemology.库恩的《科学革命的结构》在社会学与认识论之间
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2014 Jun;46:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.02.006.
10
[T.S. Kuhn's methodology and the history of medicine (remarks on the 30th anniversary of the publication of the Polish edition of Kuhn's work)].[托马斯·S·库恩的方法论与医学史(关于库恩著作波兰语版出版30周年的评论)]
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 1998;43(3-4):37-65.

引用本文的文献

1
A training program for researchers in population neuroimaging: Early experiences.一项针对人群神经影像学研究人员的培训计划:早期经验
Front Neuroimaging. 2022 Aug 25;1:896350. doi: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.896350. eCollection 2022.
2
Towards a Framework for Unifying Research in Theoretical Psychology.迈向统一理论心理学研究的框架
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Dec;58(4):1651-1667. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09790-z. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
3
Indigenous Psychology as a General Science for Escaping the Snares of Psychological Methodolatry.

本文引用的文献

1
The weirdest people in the world?世界上最奇怪的人?
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
2
Individualism: a valid and important dimension of cultural differences between nations.个人主义:国家间文化差异的一个有效且重要的维度。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(1):17-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_2.
3
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.重新思考个人主义与集体主义:理论假设与元分析评估
本土心理学作为一种普遍科学,可避免陷入心理学方法崇拜的陷阱。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2023 Jun;57(2):381-389. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09724-1. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jan;128(1):3-72.
4
Kohlberg's moral stage theory: a Piagetian revision.科尔伯格的道德阶段理论:皮亚杰理论的修正版。
Hum Dev. 1979;22(2):89-112. doi: 10.1159/000272431.