• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于深度学习视觉模型的胸腔积液分类:对比损失。

Classification of pleural effusions using deep learning visual models: contrastive-loss.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 1;12(1):5532. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09550-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-09550-w
PMID:35365722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8975824/
Abstract

Blood and fluid analysis is extensively used for classifying the etiology of pleural effusion. However, most studies focused on determining the presence of a disease. This study classified pleural effusion etiology employing deep learning models by applying contrastive-loss. Patients with pleural effusion who underwent thoracentesis between 2009 and 2019 at the Asan Medical Center were analyzed. Five different models for categorizing the etiology of pleural effusion were compared. The performance metrics were top-1 accuracy, top-2 accuracy, and micro-and weighted-AUROC. UMAP and t-SNE were used to visualize the contrastive-loss model's embedding space. Although the 5 models displayed similar performance in the validation set, the contrastive-loss model showed the highest accuracy in the extra-validation set. Additionally, the accuracy and micro-AUROC of the contrastive-loss model were 81.7% and 0.942 in the validation set, and 66.2% and 0.867 in the extra-validation set. Furthermore, the embedding space visualization in the contrastive-loss model exhibited typical and atypical effusion results by comparing the true and false positives of the rule-based criteria. Therefore, classifying the etiology of pleural effusion was achievable using the contrastive-loss model. Conclusively, visualization of the contrastive-loss model will provide clinicians with valuable insights for etiology diagnosis by differentiating between typical and atypical disease types.

摘要

血液和体液分析广泛用于分类胸腔积液的病因。然而,大多数研究都集中在确定疾病的存在。本研究通过应用对比损失来使用深度学习模型对胸腔积液病因进行分类。分析了 2009 年至 2019 年期间在 Asan 医疗中心接受胸腔穿刺术的胸腔积液患者。比较了五种不同的胸腔积液病因分类模型。性能指标包括 top-1 准确率、top-2 准确率、微调和加权-AUROC。UMAP 和 t-SNE 用于可视化对比损失模型的嵌入空间。虽然 5 种模型在验证集中表现出相似的性能,但对比损失模型在额外验证集中表现出最高的准确率。此外,对比损失模型在验证集中的准确率和微 AUROC 分别为 81.7%和 0.942,在额外验证集中分别为 66.2%和 0.867。此外,通过比较基于规则的标准的真阳性和假阳性,对比损失模型的嵌入空间可视化展示了典型和非典型积液结果。因此,使用对比损失模型可以实现胸腔积液病因的分类。总之,对比损失模型的可视化将通过区分典型和非典型疾病类型,为临床医生提供病因诊断的有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/8975824/d22bb6878f30/41598_2022_9550_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/8975824/d2ba2ba6f496/41598_2022_9550_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/8975824/5aeafe37d261/41598_2022_9550_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/8975824/a8731a51173a/41598_2022_9550_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/8975824/ad20c8f3a577/41598_2022_9550_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/8975824/d22bb6878f30/41598_2022_9550_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/8975824/d2ba2ba6f496/41598_2022_9550_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/8975824/5aeafe37d261/41598_2022_9550_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/8975824/a8731a51173a/41598_2022_9550_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/8975824/ad20c8f3a577/41598_2022_9550_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/8975824/d22bb6878f30/41598_2022_9550_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Classification of pleural effusions using deep learning visual models: contrastive-loss.基于深度学习视觉模型的胸腔积液分类:对比损失。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 1;12(1):5532. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09550-w.
2
Differential Diagnosis of Pleural Effusion Using Machine Learning.基于机器学习的胸腔积液鉴别诊断。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Feb;21(2):211-217. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202305-410OC.
3
Concordant and Discordant Exudates and Their Effect on the Accuracy of Light's Criteria to Diagnose Exudative Pleural Effusions.一致性和不一致性渗出液及其对Light标准诊断渗出性胸腔积液准确性的影响。
Am J Med Sci. 2016 Dec;352(6):549-556. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
4
The serum-effusion albumin gradient in the evaluation of pleural effusions.用于评估胸腔积液的血清-胸水白蛋白梯度
Chest. 1990 Sep;98(3):546-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.98.3.546.
5
Diagnostic Accuracy of Thoracic Ultrasonography to Differentiate Transudative From Exudative Pleural Effusion.胸腔超声对胸水中渗出液与漏出液的鉴别诊断准确性。
Chest. 2020 Aug;158(2):692-697. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.02.051. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
6
Pleural fluid cell-free DNA in parapneumonic pleural effusion.肺炎旁胸腔积液中的胸腔积液游离DNA
Clin Biochem. 2015 Oct;48(15):1003-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.07.096. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
7
[Contribution of pleural fluid analysis to the diagnosis of pleural effusion].[胸腔积液分析对胸腔积液诊断的贡献]
Med Clin (Barc). 2015 Aug 21;145(4):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
8
Atypical Pleural Fluid Profiles in Tuberculous Pleural Effusion: Sequential Changes Compared with Parapneumonic and Malignant Pleural Effusions.结核性胸腔积液中的非典型胸腔积液特征:与肺炎旁胸腔积液和恶性胸腔积液相比的序贯变化
Intern Med. 2016;55(13):1713-9. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.5803. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
9
A retrospective study on the combined biomarkers and ratios in serum and pleural fluid to distinguish the multiple types of pleural effusion.一项关于联合生物标志物和比值在血清和胸腔积液中鉴别多种类型胸腔积液的回顾性研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01459-w.
10
Does this patient have an exudative pleural effusion? The Rational Clinical Examination systematic review.这位患者是否有渗出性胸腔积液?基于系统评价的临床合理检查。
JAMA. 2014 Jun 18;311(23):2422-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5552.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing AI for Improved Detection and Classification of Pleural Effusion: Insights and Innovations.利用人工智能改进胸腔积液的检测与分类:见解与创新
Can Respir J. 2025 Aug 6;2025:2882255. doi: 10.1155/carj/2882255. eCollection 2025.
2
Machine learning-based Diagnostic model for determining the etiology of pleural effusion using Age, ADA and LDH.基于机器学习的诊断模型,用于利用年龄、腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)确定胸腔积液的病因
Respir Res. 2025 May 2;26(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03253-2.
3
Man versus Machine in Pleural Diagnostics: Does Artificial Intelligence Provide the Solution?

本文引用的文献

1
Can parapneumonic effusion be diagnosed only with pleural fluid analysis?仅通过胸腔积液分析就能诊断肺炎旁胸腔积液吗?
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Jun;12(6):3422-3425. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.02.
2
Diagnosis of infectious pleural effusion using predictive models based on pleural fluid biomarkers.基于胸腔积液生物标志物的预测模型对感染性胸腔积液的诊断
Ann Thorac Med. 2019 Oct-Dec;14(4):254-263. doi: 10.4103/atm.ATM_77_19.
3
Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP.使用UMAP进行单细胞数据可视化的降维方法。
胸膜诊断中的人机对抗:人工智能能提供解决方案吗?
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Feb;21(2):202-203. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202311-960ED.
4
Conditional diagnostic accuracy according to inflammation status and age for diagnosing tuberculous effusion.根据炎症状态和年龄对结核性渗出液进行有条件的诊断准确性。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Oct 20;23(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02700-4.
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Dec 3. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4314.
4
Pleural Disease.胸膜疾病
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):740-751. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1403503.
5
Deep learning architectures for multi-label classification of intelligent health risk prediction.深度学习架构在智能健康风险预测多标签分类中的应用。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Dec 28;18(Suppl 14):523. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1898-z.
6
Pleural effusion: diagnosis, treatment, and management.胸腔积液:诊断、治疗与管理
Open Access Emerg Med. 2012 Jun 22;4:31-52. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S29942. eCollection 2012.
7
A De-identification method for bilingual clinical texts of various note types.一种针对各种笔记类型的双语临床文本的去识别方法。
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Jan;30(1):7-15. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.1.7. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
8
Lessons Learned from Development of De-identification System for Biomedical Research in a Korean Tertiary Hospital.韩国一家三级医院生物医学研究去识别化系统开发的经验教训
Healthc Inform Res. 2013 Jun;19(2):102-9. doi: 10.4258/hir.2013.19.2.102. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
9
Pleural infection-current diagnosis and management.胸腔感染——当前的诊断与管理。
J Thorac Dis. 2012 Apr 1;4(2):186-93. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.01.12.
10
Investigation of a unilateral pleural effusion in adults: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010.成人单侧胸腔积液的调查:英国胸科学会2010年胸膜疾病指南
Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii4-17. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136978.