Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Department of Nursing, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03302-0.
Proper inhaler device usage is paramount for control of underlying obstructive airway disease. Hence, education to healthcare professionals who will eventually educate patients need to be done effectively. We developed an application for mobile devices for education on six medical inhaler devices, the metered-dose inhaler (MDI), Turbuhaler, Accuhaler, Breezhaler, Ellipta and Respimat, and studied if there were any difference between the application and the manufacturer's instructions on inhaler technique. The aim of this study is to see if inhaler education via a mobile phone app is comparable to manual instruction for health care professions.
Participants, who were nursing students, were randomized to learn the inhaler devices via the manufacturer's instruction guide or a mobile device app designed specifically for education on inhaler devices.
There were 45 participants in each group. 78% of them were females with a median age of 21 (IQR 3). 67% used an Apple mobile device and the remainder used an Android device. The mobile device showed better total improvement points for the Turbuhaler device (262 vs 287 points; P = 0.02). Participants learning from the manufacturer's guide had a significantly higher total improvement points in the Breezhaler (370 vs 327 points; P < 0.01) and Ellipta (214 vs 174 points; P < 0.01) device. Both interventions showed improvement in total scores for demonstrating the correct usage of all inhaler devices. MDI has the least number of correct steps for both interventions. The participants' reported their mean (SD) self-rated knowledge was significantly higher for those using the app for all devices as compared to those that did not (4.33 (0.68) vs 4.73 (0.42); P = < 0.01). Self-reported confidence level was found to be higher in the mobile app group, but this was not statistically significant. The app was well received and scored of 4.42 of 5 with regards to its quality.
Using a mobile inhaler app is just as effective to teach inhaler device techniques to healthcare professionals and is likely a more convenient, versatile and important adjunct to learning.
National Healthcare Group Ethics Board (2018/00960).
适当的吸入器设备使用对于控制潜在的气道阻塞性疾病至关重要。因此,需要对最终将对患者进行教育的医疗保健专业人员进行有效教育。我们为六种医疗吸入器设备(计量吸入器(MDI)、都保、Accuhaler、Breezhaler、Ellipta 和 Respimat)开发了一款移动设备应用程序,用于教育,并研究了该应用程序与制造商的吸入器技术说明之间是否存在差异。本研究旨在观察通过移动电话应用程序进行吸入器教育是否与医疗保健专业人员的手动指导相当。
参与者为护理学生,他们被随机分配通过制造商的说明指南或专门为吸入器设备教育设计的移动设备应用程序学习吸入器设备。
每组有 45 名参与者。其中 78%为女性,中位年龄为 21 岁(IQR 3)。67%使用苹果移动设备,其余使用安卓设备。移动设备在都保装置方面显示出更好的总改善点数(262 对 287 点;P=0.02)。通过制造商指南学习的参与者在 Breezhaler(370 对 327 点;P<0.01)和 Ellipta(214 对 174 点;P<0.01)装置方面的总改善点数明显更高。两种干预措施均显示出所有吸入器设备正确使用方面的总评分提高。MDI 在两种干预措施中都有最少的正确步骤。使用应用程序的参与者报告其平均(SD)自我评估知识显著高于未使用应用程序的参与者(4.33(0.68)对 4.73(0.42);P<0.01)。在移动应用程序组中发现自我报告的信心水平更高,但这没有统计学意义。该应用程序受到好评,其质量得分为 4.42(满分 5 分)。
使用移动吸入器应用程序教授吸入器设备技术对医疗保健专业人员同样有效,并且可能是一种更方便、多功能且重要的学习辅助工具。
国家医疗保健集团伦理委员会(2018/00960)。