Patanwala Asad E, Moran Benjamin, Johnstone Charlotte, Koelzow Heike, Penm Jonathan
Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Pharmacy, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Mar 28;4(4):e0665. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000665. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Transdermal buprenorphine (TBUP) may be useful for postoperative pain after major surgery, when pain is expected to be severe and sustained. The objective of this study was to compare pain control and opioid consumption in critically ill postoperative patients who were treated with TBUP or not during ICU admission.
This was a retrospective, parallel, cohort study.
ICU of a quaternary, urban hospital in Sydney, Australia.
Data were obtained for all patients admitted to the ICU from January 2019 to July 2021 after major gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) surgery.
TBUP or non-TBUP.
Pain control was compared between patients who received TBUP and those who did not receive TBUP. The primary outcome was the probability of significant pain. A significant pain score was defined as greater than or equal to 4 on the 0-10 numeric rating scale or greater than or equal to 6 on the behavioral pain scale. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences. The cohort included 376 patients, with 224 (60%) in the control group and 152 (40%) in the TBUP group. The mean age was 60 ± 14 years, 202 (54%) were male, mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score was 44 ± 13, and 147 (39%) received mechanical ventilation. After adjustment, the median probability of significant pain was 0.25 with control and 0.30 with TBUP (median difference, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.04-0.11; = 0.44). The median opioid consumption (oral morphine milligram equivalents) per day was 5.7 mg with control and 10.1 mg with TBUP (median difference, 0.4 mg; 95% CI, -0.4 to 3.7 mg; = 0.31).
In patients who are admitted to the ICU after major GI or GU procedures, the use of TBUP in the ICU was not associated with improved pain control or opioid consumption compared with those who did not receive TBUP.
当预计疼痛严重且持续时,经皮丁丙诺啡(TBUP)可能对大手术后的术后疼痛有效。本研究的目的是比较在重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间接受或未接受TBUP治疗的重症术后患者的疼痛控制情况和阿片类药物消耗量。
这是一项回顾性、平行队列研究。
澳大利亚悉尼一家四级城市医院的ICU。
收集了2019年1月至2021年7月在接受重大胃肠道(GI)或泌尿生殖系统(GU)手术后入住ICU的所有患者的数据。
TBUP或非TBUP。
比较接受TBUP和未接受TBUP的患者的疼痛控制情况。主要结局是出现显著疼痛的概率。显著疼痛评分定义为在0-10数字评分量表上大于或等于4,或在行为疼痛量表上大于或等于6。采用治疗权重逆概率法对基线差异进行调整。该队列包括376例患者,对照组224例(60%),TBUP组152例(40%)。平均年龄为60±14岁,男性202例(54%),急性生理与慢性健康状况评分III(APACHE III)平均分为44±13,147例(39%)接受机械通气。调整后,对照组出现显著疼痛的中位数概率为0.25,TBUP组为0.30(中位数差异为0.02;95%CI为0.04-0.11;P=0.44)。对照组每天阿片类药物消耗量(口服吗啡毫克当量)中位数为5.7mg,TBUP组为10.1mg(中位数差异为0.4mg;95%CI为-0.4至3.7mg;P=0.31)。
在接受重大GI或GU手术后入住ICU的患者中,与未接受TBUP的患者相比,在ICU使用TBUP与疼痛控制改善或阿片类药物消耗量减少无关。