• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型青少年神经功能游戏测试的可行性与可靠性:平衡测试组合

Feasibility and Reliability of a Novel Game-Based Test of Neurological Function in Youth: The Equilibrium Test Battery.

作者信息

Shepherd Heather A, van Rassel Cody R, Black Amanda M, Graham Robert F, Yeates Keith Owen, Emery Carolyn A, Schneider Kathryn J

机构信息

Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Apr 1;17(3):378-389. doi: 10.26603/001c.32527. eCollection 2022.

DOI:
10.26603/001c.32527
PMID:35391865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8975567/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An estimated 11% of Canadian adolescents will sustain a sport-related concussion each year. However, diagnostic tools to detect and monitor concussive outcomes are limited.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and test-retest reliability of the Highmark Interactive Equilibrium (HIEQ) test battery in uninjured adolescents.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study with repeated measurements.

METHODS

Participants completed the HIEQ test battery, a game-based platform on an iPad application, that assesses balance, cognitive function, and visual function, for up to 15 consecutive school days in a group classroom setting. Feasibility for use of the HIEQ was evaluated by (1) recruitment rates; (2) retention rates; (3) test completion without assistance; and (4) adverse events. Test-retest reliability was examined using Bland Altman 95% limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients comparing the first and second and second and third obtained scores. Reliability across multiple baseline assessments was also analyzed using intraclass correlations for the second to sixth and seventh to eleventh obtained scores.

RESULTS

Fifty-five uninjured high school students (31 females and 24 males, mean age = 16.24 [1.09]) from three high schools participated in the study. Three participants (5%) completed all 15 days of testing, and 73% completed at least 10 of 15 test days. No adverse events were reported. Although the test was feasible, all subtests showed wide limits of agreement from first to second and from second to third testing occasions. Results indicate poor-to-moderate reliability (<0.50 to 0.75) across those intervals, as well as across the second to sixth and seventh to eleventh testing occasions.

CONCLUSION

The HIEQ is feasible in high school students; however, performance was characterized by wide limits of agreement and poor-to-moderate reliability across test occasions. Future evaluation of the HIEQ in visual and auditory distraction free individual testing settings is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

摘要

背景

据估计,每年有11%的加拿大青少年会遭受与运动相关的脑震荡。然而,用于检测和监测脑震荡后果的诊断工具有限。

目的

评估Highmark交互式平衡(HIEQ)测试组合在未受伤青少年中的可行性和重测信度。

研究设计

重复测量的观察性研究。

方法

参与者在集体课堂环境中,连续15个上学日在iPad应用程序上完成HIEQ测试组合,这是一个基于游戏的平台,用于评估平衡、认知功能和视觉功能。通过以下方面评估HIEQ使用的可行性:(1)招募率;(2)留存率;(3)无需协助即可完成测试;(4)不良事件。使用Bland Altman 95%一致性界限和组内相关系数来检查重测信度,比较第一次和第二次以及第二次和第三次获得的分数。还使用组内相关系数分析第二次至第六次以及第七次至第十一次获得分数的多个基线评估的信度。

结果

来自三所高中的55名未受伤高中生(31名女性和24名男性,平均年龄 = 16.24 [1.09])参与了该研究。三名参与者(5%)完成了全部15天的测试,73%的参与者完成了15个测试日中的至少10天。未报告不良事件。尽管该测试可行,但所有子测试在第一次到第二次以及第二次到第三次测试时均显示出较宽的一致性界限。结果表明,在这些时间段以及第二次至第六次和第七次至第十一次测试时,信度较差至中等(<0.50至0.75)。

结论

HIEQ在高中生中是可行的;然而,其表现的特点是一致性界限较宽,且在测试期间信度较差至中等。未来有必要在无视觉和听觉干扰的个体测试环境中对HIEQ进行评估。

证据水平

3级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee48/8975567/3d395e9e6ba5/ijspt_2022_17_3_32527_81937.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee48/8975567/bcc8579aeb16/ijspt_2022_17_3_32527_81930.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee48/8975567/b781b438ea68/ijspt_2022_17_3_32527_81935.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee48/8975567/d4fe0cdbaa12/ijspt_2022_17_3_32527_81936.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee48/8975567/3d395e9e6ba5/ijspt_2022_17_3_32527_81937.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee48/8975567/bcc8579aeb16/ijspt_2022_17_3_32527_81930.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee48/8975567/b781b438ea68/ijspt_2022_17_3_32527_81935.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee48/8975567/d4fe0cdbaa12/ijspt_2022_17_3_32527_81936.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee48/8975567/3d395e9e6ba5/ijspt_2022_17_3_32527_81937.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility and Reliability of a Novel Game-Based Test of Neurological Function in Youth: The Equilibrium Test Battery.一种新型青少年神经功能游戏测试的可行性与可靠性:平衡测试组合
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Apr 1;17(3):378-389. doi: 10.26603/001c.32527. eCollection 2022.
2
Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.计算机化神经认知测试组合的重测信度检验
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):2000-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546514535901. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
3
The influence of validity criteria on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test-retest reliability among high school athletes.效度标准对高中运动员脑震荡后即刻评估和认知测试(ImPACT)重测信度的影响。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Apr;39(3):286-295. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1224322. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
4
Utility of VOMS, SCAT3, and ImPACT Baseline Evaluations for Acute Concussion Identification in Collegiate Athletes: Findings From the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium.VOMS、SCAT3和ImPACT基线评估在大学生运动员急性脑震荡识别中的效用:来自美国大学体育协会-国防部脑震荡评估、研究与教育(CARE)联盟的研究结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(4):1106-1119. doi: 10.1177/03635465211072261. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
5
Comparing Web-Based and Lab-Based Cognitive Assessment Using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery: A Within-Subjects Counterbalanced Study.基于剑桥神经心理测试自动化电池的网络与实验室认知评估比较:一项被试内平衡研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 4;22(8):e16792. doi: 10.2196/16792.
6
The concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of a submaximal exercise test in adolescents with autism.亚极量运动测试在自闭症青少年中的同时效度和重测信度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Jan;47(2):501-511. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2340704. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
7
American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport.美国运动医学学会立场声明:运动性脑震荡。
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;47(1):15-26. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091941.
8
Test-retest reliability of computerized concussion assessment programs.计算机化脑震荡评估程序的重测信度。
J Athl Train. 2007 Oct-Dec;42(4):509-14.
9
Feasibility and reliability of the Assessing Levels of Physical Activity health-related fitness test battery in adults with intellectual disabilities.《评估身体活动健康相关体能测试组合在智力残疾成年人中的可行性和可靠性》
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2020 Aug;64(8):612-628. doi: 10.1111/jir.12756. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
10
Test Performance and Test-Retest Reliability of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening and King-Devick Test in Adolescent Athletes During a Competitive Sport Season.青少年运动员在竞技赛季中进行前庭/眼动筛查和 King-Devick 测试的测试性能和重测信度。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):2004-2010. doi: 10.1177/0363546518768750. Epub 2018 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury on Cognitive-Motor Integration for Skilled Performance.轻度创伤性脑损伤对熟练动作认知-运动整合的影响。
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 16;11:541630. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.541630. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
THE RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL BALANCE TESTS UNDER SINGLE-TASK AND DUAL-TASK TESTING PARADIGMS IN UNINJURED ACTIVE YOUTH AND YOUNG ADULTS.单任务和双任务测试范式下未受伤的活跃青年和年轻成年人临床平衡测试的可靠性
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Aug;15(4):487-500.
2
Immediate Post-concussion and Cognitive Testing: Ceiling Effects, Reliability, and Implications for Interpretation.脑震荡后即刻与认知测试:上限效应、可靠性及其对解释的影响。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 May 21;36(4):561-569. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa074.
3
Reliability of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5 baseline testing: A 2-week test-retest study.
运动性脑震荡评估工具 5 基线测试的可靠性:2 周的测试-重测研究。
J Sci Med Sport. 2021 Feb;24(2):129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
4
The King-Devick test of rapid number naming for concussion detection: meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.用于脑震荡检测的King-Devick快速数字命名测试:文献的荟萃分析与系统评价
Concussion. 2015 Sep 10;1(2):CNC8. doi: 10.2217/cnc.15.8. eCollection 2016 Mar.
5
What domains of clinical function should be assessed after sport-related concussion? A systematic review.运动相关性脑震荡后应评估哪些临床功能领域?系统评价。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;51(11):903-918. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097403.
6
Reliability of Computerized Neurocognitive Tests for Concussion Assessment: A Meta-Analysis.用于脑震荡评估的计算机化神经认知测试的可靠性:一项荟萃分析。
J Athl Train. 2017 Sep;52(9):826-833. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.6.03. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
7
Consensus statement on concussion in sport-the 5 international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016.《运动性脑震荡共识声明——2016年10月于柏林召开的第五届国际运动性脑震荡会议》
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;51(11):838-847. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097699. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
8
The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition (SCAT5): Background and rationale.《运动性脑震荡评估工具第五版》(SCAT5):背景与原理。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;51(11):848-850. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097506. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
9
Normative Values of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3 (SCAT3) in High School Athletes.高中运动员运动性脑震荡评估工具3(SCAT3)的常模值
Clin J Sport Med. 2017 Sep;27(5):462-467. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000389.
10
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.