• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情大流行压力下武汉市民对防疫指南的遵守情况:一项多区横断面比较分析

Compliance With Epidemic Prevention Guidelines Among Wuhan Citizens Under the Stressors of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Multidistrict Comparative Analysis.

作者信息

Wang Xuelian, Cai Yuwei

机构信息

School of Journalism and Communication, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China.

Graduate School, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 23;13:808617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808617. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808617
PMID:35401375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8984243/
Abstract

The current study aims to compare compliance with the COVID-19 prevention guidelines among citizens from 13 districts in Wuhan and to explore the influence of individual-level psychological factors and district-level factors on compliance. A total of 811 participants (52% females) from 13 districts in Wuhan were invited to complete surveys regarding demographics, psychosocial factors and compliance with epidemic prevention guidelines. Individual-level characteristics were combined with district-level measures to create multilevel predictive models of compliance with prevention guidelines, and used the Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM) to analyze the data. Findings revealed that there were significant differences in the compliance of citizens from 13 districts of Wuhan ( = 5.65, < 0.001). Hierarchical linear model analysis revealed that the risk factors case growth rate, COVID-19-related perceived stress, anxiety, significantly negatively predicted compliance. Hope and conscientiousness significantly positively predicted compliance with prevention guidelines, and the negative predictive effect of anxiety disappeared. Overall, we found significant differences in compliance with prevention guidelines among different districts. Risk factors at the individual level have had a negative impact on individuals' compliance with prevention guidelines, but this impact can be mitigated by the positive role of personal protective factors such as conscientiousness and hope.

摘要

本研究旨在比较武汉市13个区居民对新冠肺炎预防指南的遵守情况,并探讨个体层面心理因素和区级因素对遵守情况的影响。共邀请了来自武汉市13个区的811名参与者(52%为女性)完成关于人口统计学、心理社会因素和遵守防疫指南情况的调查。将个体层面特征与区级指标相结合,构建遵守预防指南的多层次预测模型,并使用分层线性模型(HLM)对数据进行分析。结果显示,武汉市13个区居民的遵守情况存在显著差异( = 5.65, < 0.001)。分层线性模型分析表明,危险因素病例增长率、与新冠肺炎相关的感知压力、焦虑对遵守情况有显著负向预测作用。希望和尽责性对遵守预防指南有显著正向预测作用,焦虑的负向预测作用消失。总体而言,我们发现不同区在遵守预防指南方面存在显著差异。个体层面的危险因素对个体遵守预防指南有负面影响,但这种影响可通过尽责性和希望等个人保护因素的积极作用得到缓解。

相似文献

1
Compliance With Epidemic Prevention Guidelines Among Wuhan Citizens Under the Stressors of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Multidistrict Comparative Analysis.新冠疫情大流行压力下武汉市民对防疫指南的遵守情况:一项多区横断面比较分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 23;13:808617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808617. eCollection 2022.
2
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
Burnout and well-being of healthcare workers in the post-pandemic period of COVID-19: a perspective from the job demands-resources model.新冠疫情大流行后医护人员的倦怠和幸福感:从工作要求-资源模型看。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 2;22(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07608-z.
4
Quarantine for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Wuhan city: Support, understanding, compliance and psychological impact among lay public.武汉市冠状病毒病(COVID-19)隔离:公众的支持、理解、遵守和心理影响。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 May;144:110420. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110420. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
5
Anxiety of Nurses to support Wuhan in fighting against COVID-19 Epidemic and its Correlation With Work Stress and Self-efficacy.护士支援武汉抗击 COVID-19 疫情的焦虑及其与工作压力和自我效能的关系。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Feb;30(3-4):397-405. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15549. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
6
Prevalence and Influencing Factors on Fatigue of First-line Nurses Combating with COVID-19 in China: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.中国抗击 COVID-19 一线护士疲劳的现状及影响因素:一项描述性横断面研究。
Curr Med Sci. 2020 Aug;40(4):625-635. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2226-9. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
7
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
8
The psychological distress and coping styles in the early stages of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic in the general mainland Chinese population: A web-based survey.中国大陆一般人群在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情早期的心理困扰和应对方式:一项基于网络的调查。
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0233410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233410. eCollection 2020.
9
Geographic Distribution of Mental Health Problems Among Chinese College Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Nationwide, Web-Based Survey Study.新冠疫情期间中国大学生心理健康问题的地域分布:全国范围、基于网络的调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 29;23(1):e23126. doi: 10.2196/23126.
10
Compliance with Standard Precautions and Its Relationship with Views on Infection Control and Prevention Policy among Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间医护人员对标准预防措施的遵守情况及其与感染控制和预防政策观点的关系
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25;18(7):3420. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073420.

本文引用的文献

1
The Influence of COVID-19 on the Well-Being of People: Big Data Methods for Capturing the Well-Being of Working Adults and Protective Factors Nationwide.新冠疫情对人们幸福感的影响:运用大数据方法评估全国在职成年人的幸福感及保护因素
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 21;12:681091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.681091. eCollection 2021.
2
Mental Health of Chinese People During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Associations With Infection Severity of Region of Residence and Filial Piety.新冠疫情期间中国民众的心理健康:与居住地区感染严重程度及孝道的关联
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:633452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633452. eCollection 2021.
3
Mental Health among Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: A Cross-Sectional Multi-Country Comparison.新冠肺炎疫情封锁期间成年人的心理健康:一项跨国横断面比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 7;18(5):2686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052686.
4
Psychological Resilience of Healthcare Professionals During COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间医疗专业人员的心理弹性。
Psychol Rep. 2021 Dec;124(6):2567-2586. doi: 10.1177/0033294120965477. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
5
Lockdown, quarantine measures, and social distancing: Associations with depression, anxiety and distress at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic among adults from Germany.封锁、隔离措施和社交距离:德国成年人在 COVID-19 大流行初期与抑郁、焦虑和困扰的关联。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Nov;293:113462. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113462. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
Americans' COVID-19 Stress, Coping, and Adherence to CDC Guidelines.美国人的 COVID-19 压力、应对方式和对 CDC 指南的遵守情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2296-2303. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05898-9. Epub 2020 May 29.
7
Mental health consequences during the initial stage of the 2020 Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in Spain.2020 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情初期西班牙的心理健康后果。
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:172-176. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.040. Epub 2020 May 13.
8
[Health professionals facing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: What are the mental health risks?].面对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的卫生专业人员:心理健康风险有哪些?
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3S):S73-S80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
9
A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations.新冠疫情期间中国人心理困扰的全国性调查:启示与政策建议
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Mar 6;33(2):e100213. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213. eCollection 2020.
10
Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China.中国民众在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情初期的即时心理反应及相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;17(5):1729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051729.