Suppr超能文献

评估媒体报道在收集非法野生动物贸易扣押信息方面的可靠性。

Evaluating the reliability of media reports for gathering information about illegal wildlife trade seizures.

机构信息

Greenhood Nepal, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal.

University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2022 Apr 5;10:e13156. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13156. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Illegal wildlife trade (IWT) is threatening many species across the world. It is important to better understand the scale and characteristics of IWT to inform conservation priorities and actions. However, IWT usually takes place covertly, meaning that the data on species, trade routes and volumes is limited. This means that conservationists often have to rely on publicly available law enforcement reports of seizures as potential indicators of the magnitude and characteristics of IWT. Still, even these data may be difficult to access, leading conservationists to use media reports of seizures instead. This is the case in countries like Nepal, which have limited capacity in data keeping and reporting, and no centralized data management system. Yet reliance on media reports risks introducing further biases, which are rarely acknowledged or discussed. Here we characterize IWT in Nepal by comparing data from three sources of information on IWT between January 2005 and July 2017: seizure reports from three Nepali national daily newspapers, official seizure records for Kathmandu district, and data on additional enforcement efforts against IWT in Nepal. We found a strong positive correlation between the number of official and media-reported seizures over time, but media under-reported seizure numbers, with 78% of seizures going unreported. Seizures of charismatic, protected species were reported more often and seizure reports involving tigers were most likely to be reported (57%). Media reports appeared to be a good indicator of trends and the species being seized but not overall seizure number, with the media largely underestimating total seizure numbers. Therefore, media reports cannot be solely relied upon when it comes to informing conservation decision-making. We recommend that conservationists triangulate different data sources when using seizure data reported in the media to more rigorously characterise IWT.

摘要

非法野生动物贸易(IWT)正在威胁全球许多物种。了解 IWT 的规模和特征对于确定保护重点和采取保护行动至关重要。然而,IWT 通常是秘密进行的,这意味着关于物种、贸易路线和数量的数据有限。这意味着保护主义者通常不得不依靠执法部门公开报告的缉获情况作为 IWT 规模和特征的潜在指标。尽管如此,即使这些数据也可能难以获取,导致保护主义者转而使用媒体报道的缉获情况。尼泊尔就是这种情况,尼泊尔的数据保存和报告能力有限,也没有集中的数据管理系统。然而,依赖媒体报道可能会引入进一步的偏见,而这些偏见很少得到承认或讨论。在这里,我们通过比较 2005 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月 IWT 的三种信息来源的数据,来描述尼泊尔的 IWT:来自三份尼泊尔全国性日报的缉获报告、加德满都地区的官方缉获记录以及尼泊尔打击 IWT 的其他执法努力的数据。我们发现,随着时间的推移,官方和媒体报道的缉获数量之间存在很强的正相关关系,但媒体对缉获数量的报道不足,有 78%的缉获事件未被报道。报道的受保护的珍稀物种的缉获事件更多,涉及老虎的缉获事件最有可能被报道(57%)。媒体报道似乎是一种很好的趋势和被缉获物种的指标,但不是总体缉获数量的指标,媒体在很大程度上低估了总缉获数量。因此,在做出保护决策时,不能仅仅依靠媒体报道的缉获事件数据。我们建议保护主义者在使用媒体报道的缉获数据时,采用三角测量法,将不同的数据来源结合起来,以更严格地描述 IWT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验