• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于声监测、深度神经网络、模糊逻辑和CUSUM 控制算法的大坝结构健康监测。

Structural Health Monitoring of Dams Based on Acoustic Monitoring, Deep Neural Networks, Fuzzy Logic and a CUSUM Control Algorithm.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;22(7):2482. doi: 10.3390/s22072482.

DOI:10.3390/s22072482
PMID:35408097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9003076/
Abstract

Internal erosion is the most important failure mechanism of earth and rockfill dams. Since this type of erosion develops internally and silently, methodologies of data acquisition and processing for dam monitoring are crucial to guarantee a safe operation during the lifespan of these structures. In this context, artificial intelligence techniques show up as tools that can simplify the analysis and verification process not of the internal erosion itself, but of the effects that this pathology causes in the response of the dam to external stimuli. Therefore, within the scope of this paper, a methodological framework for monitoring internal erosion in the body of earth and rockfill dams will be proposed. For that, artificial intelligence methods, especially deep neural autoencoders, will be used to treat the acoustic data collected by geophones installed on a dam. The sensor data is processed to identify patterns and anomalies as well as to classify the dam's structural health status. In short, the acoustic dataset is preprocessed to reduce its dimensionality. In this process, for each second of acquired data, three parameters are calculated (Hjorth parameters). For each parameter, the data from all the available sensors are used to calibrate an autoencoder. Then, the reconstruction error of each autoencoder is used to monitor how far from the original (normal) state the acoustic signature of the dam is. The time series of reconstruction errors are combined with a cumulative sum (CUSUM) algorithm, which indicates changes in the sequential data collected. Additionally, the outputs of the CUSUM algorithms are treated by a fuzzy logic framework to predict the status of the structure. A scale model is built and monitored to check the effectiveness of the methodology hereby developed, showing that the existence of anomalies is promptly detected by the algorithm. The framework introduced in the present paper aims to detect internal erosion inside dams by combining different techniques in a novel context and methodological workflow. Therefore, this paper seeks to close gaps in prior studies, which mostly treated just parts of the data acquisition-processing workflow.

摘要

内部侵蚀是土石坝最重要的破坏机制。由于这种侵蚀是在内部发生的且无声无息,因此大坝监测的数据采集和处理方法对于保证这些结构在使用寿命期间的安全运行至关重要。在这种情况下,人工智能技术作为工具出现,可以简化分析和验证过程,而不是内部侵蚀本身,而是这种病理学对大坝对外界刺激的反应造成的影响。因此,在本文的范围内,将提出一种土石坝体内部侵蚀监测的方法框架。为此,将使用人工智能方法,特别是深度神经网络自动编码器,来处理安装在大坝上的地震检波器收集的声学数据。处理传感器数据以识别模式和异常,并对大坝的结构健康状况进行分类。简而言之,对声数据集进行预处理以降低其维度。在此过程中,对于采集到的每一秒数据,计算三个参数(Hjorth 参数)。对于每个参数,使用所有可用传感器的数据来校准自动编码器。然后,使用每个自动编码器的重建误差来监测大坝的声学特征与原始(正常)状态的偏离程度。重建误差的时间序列与累积和(CUSUM)算法相结合,该算法指示所收集的顺序数据的变化。此外,CUSUM 算法的输出由模糊逻辑框架进行处理,以预测结构的状态。建立和监测比例模型以检查所开发方法的有效性,表明算法可以及时检测到异常的存在。本文介绍的框架旨在通过在新的背景和方法工作流程中结合不同的技术来检测大坝内部的侵蚀。因此,本文旨在弥补先前研究的空白,这些研究大多只处理数据采集处理工作流程的部分内容。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/910f182573c0/sensors-22-02482-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/d3685505639d/sensors-22-02482-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/e9ac5371ef30/sensors-22-02482-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/798dcb240577/sensors-22-02482-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/b0b51616cbc9/sensors-22-02482-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/6630e8f14cb3/sensors-22-02482-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/ec29e2085742/sensors-22-02482-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/7607903813b3/sensors-22-02482-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/d0aaf3b3742f/sensors-22-02482-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/a8439e69be49/sensors-22-02482-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/b42ff6da96ef/sensors-22-02482-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/220af642d1bf/sensors-22-02482-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/910f182573c0/sensors-22-02482-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/d3685505639d/sensors-22-02482-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/e9ac5371ef30/sensors-22-02482-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/798dcb240577/sensors-22-02482-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/b0b51616cbc9/sensors-22-02482-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/6630e8f14cb3/sensors-22-02482-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/ec29e2085742/sensors-22-02482-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/7607903813b3/sensors-22-02482-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/d0aaf3b3742f/sensors-22-02482-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/a8439e69be49/sensors-22-02482-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/b42ff6da96ef/sensors-22-02482-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/220af642d1bf/sensors-22-02482-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fa/9003076/910f182573c0/sensors-22-02482-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Structural Health Monitoring of Dams Based on Acoustic Monitoring, Deep Neural Networks, Fuzzy Logic and a CUSUM Control Algorithm.基于声监测、深度神经网络、模糊逻辑和CUSUM 控制算法的大坝结构健康监测。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;22(7):2482. doi: 10.3390/s22072482.
2
Fuzzy Logic System Implementation on the Performance Parameters of Health Data Management Frameworks.模糊逻辑系统在健康数据管理框架性能参数上的实现。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Apr 12;2022:9382322. doi: 10.1155/2022/9382322. eCollection 2022.
3
Performance evaluation of artificial intelligence paradigms-artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for flood prediction.人工智能范式的性能评估——人工神经网络、模糊逻辑和自适应神经模糊推理系统在洪水预测中的应用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(20):25265-25282. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12410-1. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Advanced monitoring and numerical modelling of the stability, safety and reliability indicators of the earthen dam of Songloulou (Cameroon).对松鲁楼(喀麦隆)土石坝的稳定性、安全性和可靠性指标进行先进的监测和数值建模。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 11;18(10):e0292804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292804. eCollection 2023.
5
Prediction and identification using wavelet-based recurrent fuzzy neural networks.基于小波的递归模糊神经网络的预测与识别
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2004 Oct;34(5):2144-54. doi: 10.1109/tsmcb.2004.833330.
6
CVDF DYNAMIC-A Dynamic Fuzzy Testing Sample Generation Framework Based on BI-LSTM and Genetic Algorithm.基于 BI-LSTM 和遗传算法的 CVDF 动态模糊测试样本生成框架
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;22(3):1265. doi: 10.3390/s22031265.
7
Risk Analysis of Earth-Rock Dam Failures Based on Fuzzy Event Tree Method.基于模糊事件树方法的土石坝失事风险分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 29;15(5):886. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050886.
8
A novel efficient learning algorithm for self-generating fuzzy neural network with applications.一种新颖高效的自生成模糊神经网络学习算法及其应用。
Int J Neural Syst. 2012 Feb;22(1):21-35. doi: 10.1142/S0129065712003067.
9
Combining a gravitational search algorithm, particle swarm optimization, and fuzzy rules to improve the classification performance of a feed-forward neural network.结合引力搜索算法、粒子群优化和模糊规则来提高前馈神经网络的分类性能。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Oct;180:105016. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105016. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
Optimizing fuzzy clinical decision support rules using genetic algorithms.使用遗传算法优化模糊临床决策支持规则。
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:5173-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260366.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensing Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring: A State-of-the-Art Review on Performance Criteria and New-Generation Technologies.用于结构健康监测的传感技术:关于性能标准和新一代技术的最新综述
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;25(5):1424. doi: 10.3390/s25051424.
2
Damage Identification in Cement-Based Structures: A Method Based on Modal Curvatures and Continuous Wavelet Transform.基于模态曲率和连续小波变换的水泥基结构损伤识别方法
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;23(22):9292. doi: 10.3390/s23229292.
3
Dam Safety Evaluation Method after Extreme Load Condition Based on Health Monitoring and Deep Learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Spatial-Temporal Features Based Sensor Network Partition in Dam Safety Monitoring System.基于时空特征的大坝安全监测系统传感器网络划分。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Apr 29;20(9):2517. doi: 10.3390/s20092517.
2
Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments.主成分分析:综述与最新进展
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Apr 13;374(2065):20150202. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0202.
3
EEG analysis based on time domain properties.基于时域特性的脑电图分析。
基于健康监测和深度学习的极限荷载条件后的大坝安全评估方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 4;23(9):4480. doi: 10.3390/s23094480.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1970 Sep;29(3):306-10. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(70)90143-4.
4
Auto-association by multilayer perceptrons and singular value decomposition.多层感知器和奇异值分解的自联想
Biol Cybern. 1988;59(4-5):291-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00332918.