Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 22;19(7):3747. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073747.
For nearly two decades, mobile health or (m-Health) was hailed as the most innovative and enabling area for the digital transformation of healthcare globally. However, this profound vision became a fleeting view since the inception and domination of smart phones, and the reorientation of the concept towards the exclusivity of global smart phone application markets and services. The global consumerization of m-Health in numerous disciplines of healthcare, fitness and wellness areas is unprecedented. However, this divergence between 'mobile health capitalism' and the 'science of mobile health' led to the creation of the 'm-Health schism'. This schism was sustained by the continued domination of the former on the expense of the latter. This also led to increased global m-Health inequality and divide between the much-perceived health and patient benefits and the markets of m-Health. This divergence was more evident in low and middle income (LMIC) countries compared to the developed world. This powerful yet misguided evolution of the m-Health was driven essentially by complex factors. These are presented in this paper as the 'known unknowns' or 'the obvious but sanctioned facts' of m-Health. These issues had surreptitiously contributed to this reorientation and the widening schism of m-Health. The collateral damage of this process was the increased shift towards understanding 'digital health' as a conjecture term associated with mobile health. However, to date, no clear or scientific views are discussed or analyzed on the actual differences and correlation aspects between digital and mobile health. This particular 'known unknown' is presented in detail in order to provide a rapprochement framework of this correlation and valid presentations between the two areas. The framework correlates digital health with the other standard ICT for the healthcare domains of telemedicine, telehealth and e-health. These are also increasingly used in conjunction with digital health, without clear distinctions between these terms and digital health. These critical issues have become timelier and more important to discuss and present, particularly after the world has been caught off guard by the COVID-19 pandemic. The much hyped and the profiteering digital health solutions developed in response of this pandemic provided a modest impact, and the benefits were mostly inadequate in mitigating the massive health, human, and economic impact of this pandemic. This largely commercial reorientation of mobile health was unable not only to predict the severity of the pandemic, but also unable to provide adequate digital tools or effective pre-emptive digital epidemiological shielding and guarding mechanisms against this devastating pandemic. There are many lessons to be learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic from the mobile and digital health perspectives, and lessons must be learnt from the past and to address the critical aspects discussed in this paper for better understanding of mobile health and effective tackling of future global healthcare challenges.
近二十年来,移动医疗(m-Health)被誉为全球医疗数字化转型最具创新性和推动性的领域。然而,自从智能手机的出现和主导地位以及概念向全球智能手机应用市场和服务的排他性重新定位以来,这一深远的愿景成为了短暂的愿景。移动医疗在医疗保健、健身和健康领域的众多学科中的全球消费化前所未有。然而,这种“移动医疗资本主义”和“移动医疗科学”之间的分歧导致了“移动医疗分裂”的产生。这种分裂是由于前者的持续主导地位,以牺牲后者为代价。这也导致了全球移动医疗不平等和移动医疗市场与人们普遍认为的健康和患者利益之间的鸿沟进一步扩大。与发达国家相比,这种分歧在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)更为明显。这种强大但误导的移动医疗发展主要是由复杂因素驱动的。这些因素在本文中被呈现为移动医疗的“已知未知”或“明显但被认可的事实”。这些问题已经悄然促成了这种重新定位和移动医疗鸿沟的扩大。这一过程的附带损害是,人们越来越倾向于将“数字健康”理解为与移动健康相关的推测术语。然而,迄今为止,对于数字健康和移动健康之间的实际差异和关联方面,并没有进行或分析任何明确或科学的观点。为了提供这两个领域之间的关联和有效呈现的调和框架,本文详细介绍了这一特定的“已知未知”。该框架将数字健康与远程医疗、远程保健和电子健康等医疗保健领域的其他标准信息和通信技术相关联。这些也越来越多地与数字健康一起使用,而没有在这些术语和数字健康之间进行明确区分。这些关键问题在讨论和呈现方面变得更加及时和重要,尤其是在世界因 COVID-19 大流行而措手不及时。针对这一大流行而开发的大肆宣传和盈利的数字健康解决方案产生了适度的影响,并且在减轻这一大流行对健康、人类和经济的巨大影响方面,这些解决方案的好处大多不足。这种对移动医疗的大规模商业化重新定位不仅未能预测大流行的严重程度,而且未能提供足够的数字工具或有效的先发制人的数字流行病学屏蔽和保护机制来防范这一破坏性大流行。从移动医疗和数字医疗的角度来看,人们可以从 COVID-19 大流行中吸取很多教训,必须从过去吸取教训,并解决本文讨论的关键方面,以便更好地了解移动医疗,并有效应对未来的全球医疗保健挑战。