• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在总量管制与交易制度下考虑消费者低碳意识的碳减排激励机制。

Incentive Mechanisms for Carbon Emission Abatement Considering Consumers' Low-Carbon Awareness under Cap-and-Trade Regulation.

机构信息

School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):4104. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074104.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19074104
PMID:35409786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8998235/
Abstract

In the era of sustainable development, reducing carbon emissions and achieving carbon neutrality are gradually becoming a consensus for our society. This study explores firms' incentive mechanisms for carbon emission abatement in a two-echelon supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation, where consumers exhibit low-carbon awareness. To boost the manufacturer's motivation for abatement, the retailer can provide four incentive strategies, i.e., price-only (PO), cost-sharing (CS), revenue-sharing (RS), and both (cost and revenue) sharing (BS). The equilibrium decisions under the four incentive strategies are obtained by establishing and solving game models. A two-part tariff contract is also proposed to coordinate the low-carbon supply chain. Finally, through comparisons and analyses, we find that: (1) Consumers' high low-carbon awareness can boost the manufacturer's incentive for carbon emission abatement (CEA), thus increasing supply chain members' profits. (2) It is more effective for the retailer to share its revenue to incentivize the manufacturer for abatement than to bear the investment cost of CEA. Thus, Strategy RS is better than Strategy CS and equivalent to Strategy BS. (3) The manufacturer and retailer have consistent incentive strategy preference under cap-and-trade regulation. Both firms prefer the incentive strategy with a higher cooperation level. (4) The incentive strategy with a higher cooperation level can also bring higher eco-social welfare under certain conditions.

摘要

在可持续发展的时代,减少碳排放和实现碳中和逐渐成为社会共识。本研究探讨了在消费者具有低碳意识的两阶段供应链中,在限额与交易制度下企业减排的激励机制。为了提高制造商减排的动机,零售商可以提供四种激励策略,即仅价格(PO)、成本分担(CS)、收益共享(RS)和成本与收益共享(BS)。通过建立和求解博弈模型,得到了四种激励策略下的均衡决策。还提出了一种两部收费合同来协调低碳供应链。最后,通过比较和分析,我们发现:(1)消费者的高低碳意识可以促进制造商减排的激励(CEA),从而提高供应链成员的利润。(2)零售商分享收益来激励制造商减排比承担减排的投资成本更有效,因此策略 RS 优于策略 CS,且与策略 BS 等效。(3)在限额与交易制度下,制造商和零售商具有一致的激励策略偏好。两者都偏好合作水平更高的激励策略。(4)在某些条件下,合作水平更高的激励策略也能带来更高的生态社会效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/922ee6055678/ijerph-19-04104-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/7666df08b0d8/ijerph-19-04104-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/9527e1f9218d/ijerph-19-04104-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/fe9c9025a5a0/ijerph-19-04104-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/c39c765cc3b6/ijerph-19-04104-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/77123e9ac543/ijerph-19-04104-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/69a33b96c200/ijerph-19-04104-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/d342f26a3863/ijerph-19-04104-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/f03555f95445/ijerph-19-04104-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/922ee6055678/ijerph-19-04104-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/7666df08b0d8/ijerph-19-04104-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/9527e1f9218d/ijerph-19-04104-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/fe9c9025a5a0/ijerph-19-04104-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/c39c765cc3b6/ijerph-19-04104-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/77123e9ac543/ijerph-19-04104-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/69a33b96c200/ijerph-19-04104-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/d342f26a3863/ijerph-19-04104-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/f03555f95445/ijerph-19-04104-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/922ee6055678/ijerph-19-04104-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Incentive Mechanisms for Carbon Emission Abatement Considering Consumers' Low-Carbon Awareness under Cap-and-Trade Regulation.在总量管制与交易制度下考虑消费者低碳意识的碳减排激励机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):4104. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074104.
2
Carbon emission reduction cooperation of three-echelon supply chain under consumer environmental awareness and cap-and-trade regulation.消费者环境意识和总量管制与交易制度下的三级供应链的碳排放减排合作。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(54):82411-82438. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20190-5. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
3
Supply chain joint emission reduction differential decisions and coordination considering altruistic behavior and reference low-carbon effect.考虑利他行为和参考低碳效应的供应链联合减排差异决策与协调。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):22325-22349. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16901-z. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
4
Manufacturer's Encroachment and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions Considering Cap-and-Trade Regulation and Consumers' Low-Carbon Preference.制造商的侵蚀和考虑碳交易管制和消费者低碳偏好的减排决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 21;19(16):10407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610407.
5
Green Supply Chain Decisions Under Different Power Structures: Wholesale Price vs. Revenue Sharing Contract.不同权力结构下的绿色供应链决策:批发价与收益共享合同。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7737. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217737.
6
Retailer-driven carbon emission reduction: contract design in the presence of information asymmetry and cap-and-trade.零售商主导的碳排放减少:信息不对称和总量管制与交易下的合同设计。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(55):82855-82872. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21231-9. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
7
Impacts of Supply Chain Competition on Firms' Carbon Emission Reduction and Social Welfare under Cap-and-Trade Regulation.在总量管制与交易制度下,供应链竞争对企业减排与社会福利的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 9;19(6):3226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063226.
8
Optimal pricing and green decisions in a dual-channel supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation.带总量管制与交易规制的双渠道供应链的最优定价与绿色决策。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(19):28208-28225. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18097-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
9
Low-carbon strategies in dual-channel supply chain under risk aversion.规避风险下的双渠道供应链低碳策略。
Math Biosci Eng. 2022 Mar 14;19(5):4765-4793. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022223.
10
Research on single/cooperative emission reduction strategy under different power structures.不同权力结构下的单一/合作减排策略研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(36):55213-55234. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19603-2. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of context cues on college students' purchase behavior for low-carbon products in CBEC.情境线索对大学生在跨境电子商务中购买低碳产品行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 22;14:1287235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287235. eCollection 2023.
2
Study of Carbon Reduction and Marketing Decisions with the Envisioning of a Favorable Event under Cap-and-Trade Regulation.在总量管制与交易制度下,对有利事件的预想与碳减排和营销策略的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;20(5):4644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054644.
3
Remanufacturing Strategy Choice of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Considering Carbon Emission Trading, Green Innovation, and Green Consumers.

本文引用的文献

1
Impacts of Supply Chain Competition on Firms' Carbon Emission Reduction and Social Welfare under Cap-and-Trade Regulation.在总量管制与交易制度下,供应链竞争对企业减排与社会福利的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 9;19(6):3226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063226.
2
The Impact of Government Subsidies on the Low-Carbon Supply Chain Based on Carbon Emission Reduction Level.基于减排水平的政府补贴对低碳供应链的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;18(14):7603. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147603.
3
A United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals perspective for sustainable textile and apparel supply chain management.
考虑碳排放交易、绿色创新和绿色消费者的闭环供应链网络再制造策略选择。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;19(11):6782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116782.
从联合国可持续发展目标角度看可持续纺织服装供应链管理
Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2020 Sep;141:102010. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102010. Epub 2020 Jul 17.