Suppr超能文献

在总量管制与交易制度下考虑消费者低碳意识的碳减排激励机制。

Incentive Mechanisms for Carbon Emission Abatement Considering Consumers' Low-Carbon Awareness under Cap-and-Trade Regulation.

机构信息

School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):4104. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074104.

Abstract

In the era of sustainable development, reducing carbon emissions and achieving carbon neutrality are gradually becoming a consensus for our society. This study explores firms' incentive mechanisms for carbon emission abatement in a two-echelon supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation, where consumers exhibit low-carbon awareness. To boost the manufacturer's motivation for abatement, the retailer can provide four incentive strategies, i.e., price-only (PO), cost-sharing (CS), revenue-sharing (RS), and both (cost and revenue) sharing (BS). The equilibrium decisions under the four incentive strategies are obtained by establishing and solving game models. A two-part tariff contract is also proposed to coordinate the low-carbon supply chain. Finally, through comparisons and analyses, we find that: (1) Consumers' high low-carbon awareness can boost the manufacturer's incentive for carbon emission abatement (CEA), thus increasing supply chain members' profits. (2) It is more effective for the retailer to share its revenue to incentivize the manufacturer for abatement than to bear the investment cost of CEA. Thus, Strategy RS is better than Strategy CS and equivalent to Strategy BS. (3) The manufacturer and retailer have consistent incentive strategy preference under cap-and-trade regulation. Both firms prefer the incentive strategy with a higher cooperation level. (4) The incentive strategy with a higher cooperation level can also bring higher eco-social welfare under certain conditions.

摘要

在可持续发展的时代,减少碳排放和实现碳中和逐渐成为社会共识。本研究探讨了在消费者具有低碳意识的两阶段供应链中,在限额与交易制度下企业减排的激励机制。为了提高制造商减排的动机,零售商可以提供四种激励策略,即仅价格(PO)、成本分担(CS)、收益共享(RS)和成本与收益共享(BS)。通过建立和求解博弈模型,得到了四种激励策略下的均衡决策。还提出了一种两部收费合同来协调低碳供应链。最后,通过比较和分析,我们发现:(1)消费者的高低碳意识可以促进制造商减排的激励(CEA),从而提高供应链成员的利润。(2)零售商分享收益来激励制造商减排比承担减排的投资成本更有效,因此策略 RS 优于策略 CS,且与策略 BS 等效。(3)在限额与交易制度下,制造商和零售商具有一致的激励策略偏好。两者都偏好合作水平更高的激励策略。(4)在某些条件下,合作水平更高的激励策略也能带来更高的生态社会效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ce/8998235/7666df08b0d8/ijerph-19-04104-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验