• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用临床和DaTSCAN单光子发射计算机断层扫描成像特征在扫描无异常发现(SWEDD)组中进行早期帕金森病识别的机器学习

Machine Learning for Early Parkinson's Disease Identification within SWEDD Group Using Clinical and DaTSCAN SPECT Imaging Features.

作者信息

Khachnaoui Hajer, Khlifa Nawres, Mabrouk Rostom

机构信息

Laboratoire de Biophysique et Technologies Médicales, Institut Superieur des Technologies Medicales de Tunis, Université de Tunis El Manar, Tunis 1006, Tunisia.

Department of Computer Sciences, Bishop's University, Bishop's 2600 College St., Sherbrooke, QC J1M 1Z7, Canada.

出版信息

J Imaging. 2022 Apr 2;8(4):97. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8040097.

DOI:10.3390/jimaging8040097
PMID:35448224
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9032319/
Abstract

Early Parkinson's Disease (PD) diagnosis is a critical challenge in the treatment process. Meeting this challenge allows appropriate planning for patients. However, Scan Without Evidence of Dopaminergic Deficit (SWEDD) is a heterogeneous group of PD patients and Healthy Controls (HC) in clinical and imaging features. The application of diagnostic tools based on Machine Learning (ML) comes into play here as they are capable of distinguishing between HC subjects and PD patients within an SWEDD group. In the present study, three ML algorithms were used to separate PD patients from HC within an SWEDD group. Data of 548 subjects were firstly analyzed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) techniques. Using the best reduction technique result, we built the following clustering models: Density-Based Spatial (DBSCAN), K-means and Hierarchical Clustering. According to our findings, LDA performs better than PCA; therefore, LDA was used as input for the clustering models. The different models' performances were assessed by comparing the clustering algorithms outcomes with the ground truth after a follow-up. Hierarchical Clustering surpassed DBSCAN and K-means algorithms by 64%, 78.13% and 38.89% in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. The proposed method demonstrated the suitability of ML models to distinguish PD patients from HC subjects within an SWEDD group.

摘要

早期帕金森病(PD)诊断是治疗过程中的一项关键挑战。应对这一挑战有助于为患者进行合理规划。然而,多巴胺能缺陷无证据扫描(SWEDD)患者组在临床和影像特征方面是一个异质性群体,包含帕金森病患者和健康对照(HC)。基于机器学习(ML)的诊断工具在此发挥了作用,因为它们能够在SWEDD组内区分健康对照者和帕金森病患者。在本研究中,使用了三种机器学习算法在SWEDD组内将帕金森病患者与健康对照区分开来。首先通过主成分分析(PCA)和线性判别分析(LDA)技术对548名受试者的数据进行了分析。利用最佳降维技术结果,我们构建了以下聚类模型:基于密度的空间聚类(DBSCAN)、K均值聚类和层次聚类。根据我们的研究结果,LDA的表现优于PCA;因此,LDA被用作聚类模型的输入。通过在随访后将聚类算法的结果与真实情况进行比较,评估了不同模型的性能。在准确性、敏感性和特异性方面,层次聚类分别比DBSCAN和K均值算法高出64%、78.13%和38.89%。所提出的方法证明了机器学习模型在SWEDD组内区分帕金森病患者和健康对照者的适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/22ece3284346/jimaging-08-00097-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/a27e5e410b71/jimaging-08-00097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/60fb2d8bbc8b/jimaging-08-00097-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/e6936823da88/jimaging-08-00097-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/1317dd8d93f8/jimaging-08-00097-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/b971fe06b10e/jimaging-08-00097-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/29979580b41d/jimaging-08-00097-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/1859d444c480/jimaging-08-00097-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/22ece3284346/jimaging-08-00097-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/a27e5e410b71/jimaging-08-00097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/60fb2d8bbc8b/jimaging-08-00097-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/e6936823da88/jimaging-08-00097-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/1317dd8d93f8/jimaging-08-00097-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/b971fe06b10e/jimaging-08-00097-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/29979580b41d/jimaging-08-00097-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/1859d444c480/jimaging-08-00097-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5737/9032319/22ece3284346/jimaging-08-00097-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning for Early Parkinson's Disease Identification within SWEDD Group Using Clinical and DaTSCAN SPECT Imaging Features.利用临床和DaTSCAN单光子发射计算机断层扫描成像特征在扫描无异常发现(SWEDD)组中进行早期帕金森病识别的机器学习
J Imaging. 2022 Apr 2;8(4):97. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8040097.
2
Explainable machine learning with pairwise interactions for the classification of Parkinson's disease and SWEDD from clinical and imaging features.基于两两交互的可解释机器学习在帕金森病和 SWEDD 的临床和影像特征分类中的应用。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2022 Oct;16(5):2188-2198. doi: 10.1007/s11682-022-00688-9. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Long-term follow-up study of SWEDD patients with mild parkinsonian signs.有轻度帕金森氏症体征的SWEDD患者的长期随访研究。
BMJ Neurol Open. 2024 Apr 24;6(1):e000600. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2023-000600. eCollection 2024.
4
Using Tractography to Distinguish SWEDD from Parkinson's Disease Patients Based on Connectivity.基于连通性,利用纤维束成像技术区分扫描无异常发现的痴呆(SWEDD)与帕金森病患者。
Parkinsons Dis. 2016;2016:8704910. doi: 10.1155/2016/8704910. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
5
Nigral volumetric and microstructural measures in individuals with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit.对扫描时无多巴胺能缺乏证据的个体进行黑质体积和微观结构测量。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 24;16:1048945. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1048945. eCollection 2022.
6
Structural connectivity profile of scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD) patients compared to normal controls and Parkinson's disease patients.与正常对照组和帕金森病患者相比,无多巴胺能缺陷证据(SWEDD)患者扫描的结构连接图谱。
Springerplus. 2016 Aug 26;5(1):1421. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3110-8. eCollection 2016.
7
Non-motor Clinical and Biomarker Predictors Enable High Cross-Validated Accuracy Detection of Early PD but Lesser Cross-Validated Accuracy Detection of Scans Without Evidence of Dopaminergic Deficit.非运动临床和生物标志物预测指标能够实现对早期帕金森病的高交叉验证准确性检测,但对无多巴胺能缺陷证据的扫描的交叉验证准确性检测较低。
Front Neurol. 2020 May 11;11:364. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00364. eCollection 2020.
8
The Parkinson's progression markers initiative (PPMI) - establishing a PD biomarker cohort.帕金森病进展标志物计划(PPMI)——建立帕金森病生物标志物队列。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Oct 31;5(12):1460-1477. doi: 10.1002/acn3.644. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
Preserved Extrastriatal I-FP-CIT Binding in Scans Without Evidence of Dopaminergic Deficit (SWEDD).无多巴胺能缺陷扫描中保留的额外 I-FP-CIT 结合(SWEDD)。
Mol Imaging Biol. 2020 Dec;22(6):1592-1599. doi: 10.1007/s11307-020-01502-y.
10
Local White Matter Fiber Clustering Differentiates Parkinson's Disease Diagnoses.局部白质纤维聚类可区分帕金森病诊断。
Neuroscience. 2020 May 21;435:146-160. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.03.049. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
ModFus-PD: synergizing cross-modal attention and contrastive learning for enhanced multimodal diagnosis of Parkinson's disease.ModFus-PD:协同跨模态注意力与对比学习以增强帕金森病的多模态诊断
Front Comput Neurosci. 2025 Jul 16;19:1604399. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2025.1604399. eCollection 2025.
2
Classification of Parkinson's disease with and without dopaminergic deficiency based on non-motor symptoms and structural neuroimaging.基于非运动症状和结构神经影像学对伴有和不伴有多巴胺能缺乏的帕金森病进行分类。
Neurol Sci. 2025 Jun;46(6):2611-2625. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08045-6. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
3
A survey of detection of Parkinson's disease using artificial intelligence models with multiple modalities and various data preprocessing techniques.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical value of machine learning-based interpretation of I-123 FP-CIT scans to detect Parkinson's disease: a two-center study.基于机器学习的 I-123 FP-CIT 扫描解读对帕金森病的临床价值:一项双中心研究。
Ann Nucl Med. 2021 Mar;35(3):378-385. doi: 10.1007/s12149-021-01576-w. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Classification of Parkinson's disease based on multi-modal features and stacking ensemble learning.基于多模态特征和堆叠集成学习的帕金森病分类。
J Neurosci Methods. 2021 Feb 15;350:109019. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.109019. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
3
A bilinear convolutional neural network for lung nodules classification on CT images.
一项关于使用具有多种模态和各种数据预处理技术的人工智能模型检测帕金森病的调查。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Oct 28;13:388. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1777_23. eCollection 2024.
4
Houston, We Have AI Problem! Quality Issues with Neuroimaging-Based Artificial Intelligence in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.休斯顿,我们遇到人工智能问题了!帕金森病中基于神经影像的人工智能的质量问题:一项系统综述。
Mov Disord. 2024 Dec;39(12):2130-2143. doi: 10.1002/mds.30002. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
5
Automatic Detection of AMD and DME Retinal Pathologies Using Deep Learning.使用深度学习自动检测年龄相关性黄斑变性和糖尿病性黄斑水肿视网膜病变
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2023 Nov 24;2023:9966107. doi: 10.1155/2023/9966107. eCollection 2023.
6
A review of emergent intelligent systems for the detection of Parkinson's disease.用于帕金森病检测的新兴智能系统综述。
Biomed Eng Lett. 2023 Sep 20;13(4):591-612. doi: 10.1007/s13534-023-00319-2. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Automatic and Early Detection of Parkinson's Disease by Analyzing Acoustic Signals Using Classification Algorithms Based on Recursive Feature Elimination Method.基于递归特征消除方法的分类算法通过分析声学信号自动早期检测帕金森病
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 31;13(11):1924. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111924.
8
A Computerized Analysis with Machine Learning Techniques for the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease: Past Studies and Future Perspectives.一种用于帕金森病诊断的基于机器学习技术的计算机化分析:过去的研究与未来展望。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 5;12(11):2708. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112708.
9
Imperative Role of Machine Learning Algorithm for Detection of Parkinson's Disease: Review, Challenges and Recommendations.机器学习算法在帕金森病检测中的重要作用:综述、挑战与建议
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 19;12(8):2003. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12082003.
基于 CT 图像的肺结节分类的双线性卷积神经网络。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Jan;16(1):91-101. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02283-z. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
Morphological Characterization of Functional Brain Imaging by Isosurface Analysis in Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病功能脑成像的等表面分析形态学特征。
Int J Neural Syst. 2020 Sep;30(9):2050044. doi: 10.1142/S0129065720500446. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
Classification of degenerative parkinsonism subtypes by support-vector-machine analysis and striatal I-FP-CIT indices.基于支持向量机分析和纹状体 I-FP-CIT 指数对变性帕金森病亚型的分类。
J Neurol. 2019 Jul;266(7):1771-1781. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09330-z. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
6
Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism.帕金森病和帕金森综合征。
Am J Med. 2019 Jul;132(7):802-807. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
7
What a neurologist should know about PET and SPECT functional imaging for parkinsonism: A practical perspective.神经科医生应该了解的帕金森病 PET 和 SPECT 功能成像:实用观点。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019 Feb;59:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
8
Robust Ensemble Classification Methodology for I123-Ioflupane SPECT Images and Multiple Heterogeneous Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease.用于帕金森病诊断的¹²³I-碘氟烷单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)图像和多种异质生物标志物的稳健集成分类方法
Front Neuroinform. 2018 Aug 14;12:53. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00053. eCollection 2018.
9
Estimating the Evolution of Disease in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative.估计帕金森进展标志物倡议中的疾病演变。
Neurodegener Dis. 2018;18(4):173-190. doi: 10.1159/000488780. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
10
Comparison of machine learning and semi-quantification algorithms for (I123)FP-CIT classification: the beginning of the end for semi-quantification?用于(I123)FP-CIT分类的机器学习算法与半定量算法的比较:半定量是否已走向末路?
EJNMMI Phys. 2017 Nov 29;4(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40658-017-0196-1.