Królikowska Aleksandra, Mika Anna, Plaskota Bartosz, Daszkiewicz Maciej, Kentel Monika, Kołcz Anna, Kentel Maciej, Prill Robert, Diakowska Dorota, Reichert Paweł, Stolarczyk Artur, Oleksy Łukasz
Ergonomics and Biomedical Monitoring Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Institute of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education in Krakow, 31-571 Krakow, Poland.
Biology (Basel). 2022 Apr 11;11(4):577. doi: 10.3390/biology11040577.
The Athletic Shoulder (ASH) test was introduced as a tool for quantifying the ability to produce and transfer force across the shoulder girdle. Whether using the portable isometric-based strength training device Active5™ is a reliable alternative to a gold standard force plate for ASH testing purposes remains unknown; therefore, the present study determined the reliability and validity of Active5™ usage in the ASH test compared to force plates. Fifty-one healthy participants performed the ASH test using Active5™ and K-Force plates in three separate sessions. The maximal force was measured bilaterally in a prone position at three shoulder abduction angles, precisely at 180°, 135°, and 90°. The first rater carried out the first and third sessions, spaced at a one-week interval. A second rater performed the second session. The reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The linear Pearson's correlation coefficient () calculation was used to determine the relationship between ASH test results using the two devices. The ICC = 0.77-0.99 result indicated good to excellent reliability for Active5™ usage. A high to a very high correlation between the two devices at 180° and 90° was noted ( = 0.75-0.95). This data supports the isometric-based strength training device Active5™ as a reliable and valid tool for ASH test performance.
运动肩部(ASH)测试被作为一种量化通过肩胛带产生和传递力量能力的工具引入。对于ASH测试而言,使用基于便携式等长收缩的力量训练设备Active5™是否是金标准测力板的可靠替代方案仍不明确;因此,本研究确定了与测力板相比,在ASH测试中使用Active5™的可靠性和有效性。51名健康参与者在三个不同时间段使用Active5™和K-Force测力板进行了ASH测试。在俯卧位,于三个肩部外展角度(精确为180°、135°和90°)双侧测量最大力量。第一名评估者进行了第一次和第三次测试,间隔为一周。第二名评估者进行了第二次测试。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估可靠性。通过计算线性皮尔逊相关系数()来确定使用两种设备的ASH测试结果之间的关系。ICC = 0.77 - 0.99的结果表明使用Active5™具有良好到优秀的可靠性。在180°和90°时,两种设备之间呈现高到非常高的相关性( = 0.75 - 0.95)。这些数据支持基于等长收缩的力量训练设备Active5™作为ASH测试的可靠且有效的工具。