Czerwińska Ewa, Nittner-Marszalska Marita, Zaryczański Janusz, Gąszczyk Grzegorz, Mastalerz-Migas Agnieszka, Szenborn Leszek
Clinical Department of Paediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.
Clinical Department of Internal Medicine, Pneumology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-369 Wroclaw, Poland.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Apr 8;10(4):576. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040576.
Vaccines against infectious diseases may raise safety concerns in patients undergoing allergen immunotherapy (AIT). The objective of our study was to investigate influenza vaccine and other selected prophylactic vaccines coverage in patients treated with AIT and the attitude of physicians towards vaccinations in this group of patients. We conducted a questionnaire-based study among patients undergoing AIT and physicians. The patients’ survey evaluated influenza and other prophylactic vaccines coverage. The physicians’ survey assessed their experience and opinions on prophylactic vaccinations during AIT. In total, 176 patients (aged 18−79 years) and 120 doctors filled the questionnaires. Patients were assigned to two groups—inhaled allergens group (n = 101) and insect venoms group (n = 68). The number of patients who received any dose (36% and 45%, p = 0.26), as well as two or more doses (17% and 22%, p = 0.43) of influenza vaccine was comparable between two groups. However, in both groups there was a significant (p < 0.0001) decrease in influenza vaccine uptake after the beginning of AIT. Patients from the inhaled allergens group declared a higher tetanus vaccine rate (41% vs. 19%, p = 0.004). The groups did not differ in the pneumococcal and tick-borne encephalitis vaccination coverage. A majority of doctors believe that prophylactic vaccinations in patients undergoing AIT are safe and effective (96% and 94%, respectively); however, as many as 87% of them identify with the need to create clear recommendations regarding vaccinating patients undergoing AIT. Prophylactic vaccine coverage is not satisfactory among Polish adult patients undergoing AIT. Polish doctors are convinced of the validity of prophylactic vaccinations during AIT.
针对传染病的疫苗可能会引起接受变应原免疫疗法(AIT)患者的安全担忧。我们研究的目的是调查接受AIT治疗患者的流感疫苗及其他选定预防性疫苗的接种率,以及医生对该组患者接种疫苗的态度。我们对接受AIT治疗的患者和医生开展了一项基于问卷调查的研究。患者调查评估了流感疫苗及其他预防性疫苗的接种率。医生调查评估了他们在AIT期间对预防性接种的经验和看法。共有176名患者(年龄在18 - 79岁之间)和120名医生填写了问卷。患者被分为两组——吸入性变应原组(n = 101)和昆虫毒液组(n = 68)。两组中接受任何剂量(36%和45%,p = 0.26)以及两剂或更多剂(17%和22%,p = 0.43)流感疫苗的患者数量相当。然而,在两组中,AIT开始后流感疫苗的接种率均显著下降(p < 0.0001)。吸入性变应原组患者报告的破伤风疫苗接种率更高(41%对19%,p = 0.004)。两组在肺炎球菌疫苗和蜱传脑炎疫苗接种率方面没有差异。大多数医生认为AIT患者进行预防性接种是安全有效的(分别为96%和94%);然而,多达87%的医生认同需要制定关于AIT患者接种疫苗的明确建议。在波兰接受AIT治疗的成年患者中,预防性疫苗接种率并不理想。波兰医生确信AIT期间预防性接种的有效性。