• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较分析影响韩国社区护理服务质量的因素。

Comparative Analysis of Factors Affecting Quality of Community-Based Care Services in Korea.

机构信息

School of Health Policy & Management, Health Science College, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea.

Department of Medical Humanities and Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084641.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19084641
PMID:35457510
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9025011/
Abstract

Aging societies have an increased need for care services. To solve the problem of care, we suggest community care, through which medical services are provided that meet individual needs. Korea provides care services in advance of the community care project and implements quality control to improve the quality of these social services. Therefore, this study aims to compare and analyze the factors affecting user satisfaction in care services in both 2013 and 2016. We analyzed secondary data from 2013 and 2016 collected by the Social Security Information Service. These data include standardized metrics for the quality of care. Based on the evaluation indexes for care service in 2013 and 2016, we used commonly used indexes for analysis. Specifically, non-profit organizations were influenced by sales, accounting management, lifetime tenure rate, etc., while for-profit organizations were affected by number of users, contract termination, etc. In addition, on-site evaluation had a negative effect on the change rate of user satisfaction. Therefore, in order to increase satisfaction with care services, evaluation indexes by service type should be diversified and differentiated. In addition, field evaluations related to user satisfaction should be performed in order to provide care services appropriate for local characteristics.

摘要

老龄化社会对护理服务的需求不断增加。为了解决护理问题,我们建议采用社区护理,通过这种方式提供满足个人需求的医疗服务。韩国在推行社区护理项目之前就提供了护理服务,并实施质量控制,以提高这些社会服务的质量。因此,本研究旨在比较和分析 2013 年和 2016 年护理服务用户满意度的影响因素。我们分析了 2013 年和 2016 年由社会保障信息服务收集的二次数据。这些数据包括护理质量的标准化指标。基于 2013 年和 2016 年的护理服务评估指标,我们使用了常用的分析指标。具体来说,非营利组织受到销售、会计管理、终身任期率等因素的影响,而营利组织则受到用户数量、合同终止等因素的影响。此外,现场评估对用户满意度变化率有负面影响。因此,为了提高护理服务的满意度,应该多样化和区分服务类型的评估指标。此外,应进行与用户满意度相关的现场评估,以便提供适合当地特点的护理服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dee6/9025011/c2213ce3410a/ijerph-19-04641-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dee6/9025011/c2213ce3410a/ijerph-19-04641-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dee6/9025011/c2213ce3410a/ijerph-19-04641-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Factors Affecting Quality of Community-Based Care Services in Korea.比较分析影响韩国社区护理服务质量的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084641.
2
What should the government do regarding health policy-making to develop community health care in Shanghai?政府应该在制定健康政策方面采取哪些措施来发展上海的社区卫生保健?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Oct-Dec;26(4):379-435. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1117.
3
Factors influencing the satisfaction of community senior care services in China: an analysis based on an extended Anderson model.影响中国社区老年护理服务满意度的因素:基于安德森扩展模型的分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 23;11:1138711. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138711. eCollection 2023.
4
Satisfaction with the care-managed support of older people: an empirical analysis.老年人对护理管理支持的满意度:一项实证分析。
Health Soc Care Community. 2001 Jan;9(1):31-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00280.x.
5
How Should the Social Service Quality Evaluation in South Korea Be Verified? Focusing on Community Care Services.韩国的社会服务质量评估应如何验证?以社区护理服务为重点。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Aug 24;8(3):294. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030294.
6
Relationship between satisfaction with mental health services, personal recovery and quality of life among service users with psychosis: a cross-sectional study.精神病服务使用者对心理健康服务的满意度、个人康复与生活质量之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 8;21(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06409-0.
7
[Community healthcare activities of physicians in public medical facilities and their evaluation by municipalities].[公立医疗机构医生的社区医疗活动及其被各市的评估]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2004 Jan;51(1):30-9.
8
Developing service user involvement in the South Korean disability services: lessons from the experience of community care policy and practice in UK.韩国残疾服务中服务使用者参与的发展:来自英国社区护理政策与实践经验的教训。
Health Soc Care Community. 2008 Mar;16(2):188-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00741.x.
9
Effect of patient-related factors on hospitalization service satisfaction and recommendation intention of medical institutions in Korea.韩国患者相关因素对医疗机构住院服务满意度和推荐意愿的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 30;23(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09754-4.
10
[A survey of home health nursing service and satisfaction at a home health agency in UTMB].[德克萨斯大学医学分校一家家庭健康机构的家庭健康护理服务与满意度调查]
Taehan Kanho. 1993 Jan-Feb;32(1):95-110.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing the Effectiveness of Data-Linked Projects for Health Promotion in Public Health Centers of South Korea.分析韩国公共卫生中心数据关联项目对健康促进的有效性。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Jun 16;16:1101-1117. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S413630. eCollection 2023.
2
Analyzing Community Care Research Trends Using Text Mining.运用文本挖掘分析社区护理研究趋势
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Jul 15;15:1493-1510. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S366726. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Participation Among Older Adults Receiving Community Care Services.接受社区护理服务的老年人的社会参与情况。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Sep;40(9):997-1007. doi: 10.1177/0733464820938973. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
2
From Residential Care to Supportive Housing for People With Psychiatric Disabilities: Past, Present, and Future.从为精神疾病患者提供的寄宿照料到支持性住房:过去、现在与未来
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 22;10:862. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00862. eCollection 2019.
3
Influences on the access to and use of formal community care by people with dementia and their informal caregivers: a scoping review.
痴呆症患者及其非正式照护者获得和使用正式社区护理的影响:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 1;19(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3825-z.
4
Overview of the Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia.韩国认知衰老与痴呆纵向研究概述
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Aug;15(8):767-774. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.06.02. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
5
Quality indicators for community care for older people: A systematic review.老年人社区护理质量指标:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 9;13(1):e0190298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190298. eCollection 2018.
6
Forging a Frailty-Ready Healthcare System to Meet Population Ageing.打造脆弱性准备型医疗体系,应对人口老龄化挑战。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 24;14(12):1448. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121448.
7
Implementing Information and Communication Technology to Support Community Aged Care Service Integration: Lessons from an Australian Aged Care Provider.实施信息通信技术以支持社区老年护理服务整合:来自澳大利亚一家老年护理服务提供商的经验教训
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Apr 10;17(1):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2437.
8
Community Care for People with Complex Care Needs: Bridging the Gap between Health and Social Care.为有复杂护理需求者提供的社区护理:弥合健康与社会护理之间的差距。
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Jul 21;17(4):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2944.
9
Home or foster home care versus institutional long-term care for functionally dependent older people.功能依赖老年人的居家或寄养家庭护理与机构长期护理对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 3;4(4):CD009844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009844.pub2.
10
The relationship between deinstitutionalization and quality of care in longer-term psychiatric and social care facilities in Europe: A cross-sectional study.欧洲长期精神病和社会护理机构中去机构化与护理质量的关系:一项横断面研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 May;42:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Dec 22.