• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于时间序列动力学的情绪症状分组。

Grouping of mood symptoms by time series dynamics.

机构信息

Applied Mathematics Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Mathematics and Computer Science Program, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 15;309:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.117. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.117
PMID:35461820
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding how symptoms of mood disorders vary over time in relation to each other is potentially valuable for diagnosis and predicting episodes of illness. In this paper, we characterize the degree of similarity of time series of different mood disorder symptoms.

METHODS

We collected 32,215 mood disorder symptom questionnaires, administered twice-daily over 18 months to (n = 19) subjects with rapidly cycling bipolar disorder and (n = 20) healthy control subjects, using visual analog scales to rate 11 sets of symptom severity ratings plus a control item. We used Dynamic Time Warping to calculate similarity ratings between all within-subject pairs of severity ratings followed by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to identify latent factors of symptom time series across all subjects.

RESULTS

Two latent factors were identified: one with depression and anxiety; and a second, with concentration, energy, irritability, fatigue, appetite, euphoria/elation and overall mood. Restlessness, racing thoughts, and the control item (daily hours of daylight) did not cluster with any of the others.

LIMITATIONS

Limited sample size dictated that we pool bipolar and healthy patients and use an iterative EFA procedure.

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that, in a pooled sample of individuals with bipolar disorder and in healthy controls, severity ratings of overall depression and overall anxiety vary jointly as one dynamic factor, while some but not all other DSM mood symptoms vary jointly along with overall mood rating as a second dynamic factor. Further investigation may determine if these findings can simplify subjective symptom reporting in mood-monitoring studies.

摘要

背景

了解心境障碍症状随时间相互变化的方式对于诊断和预测疾病发作可能具有重要价值。本文中,我们描述了不同心境障碍症状时间序列相似程度的特征。

方法

我们收集了 32215 份心境障碍症状问卷,在 18 个月的时间里,每天两次向(n=19)快速循环双相障碍患者和(n=20)健康对照者发放问卷,采用视觉模拟量表来评定 11 组症状严重程度评分以及一项对照项目。我们使用动态时间规整来计算所有被试者内部严重程度评分对之间的相似性评分,随后进行探索性因素分析(EFA)以确定所有被试者症状时间序列的潜在因素。

结果

确定了两个潜在因素:一个与抑郁和焦虑有关;另一个与注意力、精力、易怒、疲劳、食欲、欣快/兴奋和整体情绪有关。不安、思维奔逸和对照项目(每日日照时间)与其他项目没有聚类。

局限性

样本量有限,因此我们将双相障碍患者和健康患者进行了汇总,并使用迭代 EFA 程序。

结论

该分析表明,在双相障碍患者和健康对照者的汇总样本中,整体抑郁和整体焦虑的严重程度评分作为一个动态因素共同变化,而其他一些但不是所有的 DSM 心境症状与整体情绪评分一起作为第二个动态因素共同变化。进一步的研究可能会确定这些发现是否可以简化心境监测研究中的主观症状报告。

相似文献

1
Grouping of mood symptoms by time series dynamics.基于时间序列动力学的情绪症状分组。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 15;309:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.117. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
Irritability and elation in a large bipolar youth sample: relative symptom severity and clinical outcomes over 4 years.在一个大型双相青年样本中观察到易激惹和欣快:4 年的相对症状严重程度和临床结局。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;74(1):e110-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07874.
3
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
4
Daily and weekly mood ratings using a remote capture method in high-risk offspring of bipolar parents: Compliance and symptom monitoring.使用远程采集方法对双相父母的高危子女进行日常和每周情绪评分:依从性和症状监测。
Bipolar Disord. 2019 Mar;21(2):159-167. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12721. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
5
Irritability without elation in a large bipolar youth sample: frequency and clinical description.大型双相情感障碍青少年样本中无欣快感的易激惹:发生率及临床描述
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;48(7):730-739. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181a565db.
6
Investigating symptom domains of bipolar disorder for Spanish-speakers using the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale.使用双相情感障碍症状量表对西班牙语使用者的双相情感障碍症状领域进行调查。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Nov 15;205:239-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
7
Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder and Bipolar Disorder Not Otherwise Specified: Fraternal or Identical Twins?破坏性心境失调障碍和未特定的双相情感障碍:异卵双胞胎还是同卵双胞胎?
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Mar;26(2):138-46. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0062. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
8
Autism spectrum disorder scale scores in pediatric mood and anxiety disorders.儿童情绪和焦虑障碍中的自闭症谱系障碍量表得分
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;47(6):652-661. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31816bffa5.
9
Racing and crowded thoughts in mood disorders: A data-oriented theoretical reappraisal.心境障碍中的奔逸思维和思维奔逸:一种基于数据的理论再评价。
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3):202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
10
Nonlinear dynamics of mood regulation in unaffected first-degree relatives of bipolar disorder patients.双相障碍患者未受影响的一级亲属的情绪调节的非线性动力学。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 15;243:274-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.034. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Potential of Personalized Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Networks.个性化创伤后应激障碍网络的潜力
Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Aug 11;35(Suppl 1):S141-S151. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2025.251059.
2
Dynamic time warping network analysis of posttraumatic stress symptoms in Japanese first responders.日本急救人员创伤后应激症状的动态时间规整网络分析
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2528313. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2528313. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
3
Dynamic time warp versus vector autoregression models for network analyses of psychological processes.
用于心理过程网络分析的动态时间规整与向量自回归模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 5;15(1):11720. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94782-9.
4
PTSD Symptom dynamics after the great east japan earthquake: mapping the temporal structure using Dynamic Time Warping.创伤后应激障碍症状在东日本大地震后的动态变化:使用动态时间规整映射时间结构。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2241732. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2241732.