• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低负荷血流限制和非限制运动对肌肉兴奋、神经肌肉效率和平均扭矩的急性影响。

Acute effects of low load blood flow restricted and non restricted exercise on muscle excitation, neuromuscular efficiency, and average torque.

机构信息

School of Kinesiology & Physical Therapy, Division of Kinesiology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.

Florida Space Institute, Partnership I, Research Parkway, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.

出版信息

J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2023 Jun 1;23(2):165-174.

PMID:37259656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10233231/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the acute effects of low-load blood flow restriction (LLBFR) and low-load (LL) resistance exercise on muscle excitation, neuromuscular efficiency, and average torque.

METHODS

Eleven men (age±SD=22±3yrs) randomly performed LLBFR and LL that consisted of 30 unilateral leg extensions at 30% of one-repetition maximum while surface electromyography (sEMG) and torque were simultaneously assessed. Polynomial regression analyses and slope comparisons were performed to examine patterns of responses and rates of change.

RESULTS

sEMG amplitude increased for LLBFR (9 of 11) and LL (8 of 11) and between composite responses (R=0.939-0.981). For LLBFR, sEMG amplitude increased to a greater extent for 5 of the 11 individual and for the composite responses. Similarly, neuromuscular efficiency decreased for LLBFR (8 of 11) and LL (5 of 11) as well as the composite responses r=0.902-0.929, but the decrease was larger for LLBFR than LL for the individual (4 of 11) responses. For average submaximal concentric torque, there were individual increases, decreases, and no changes for the composite responses (R=0.198-0.325).

CONCLUSION

LLBFR elicited greater fatigue-induced increases in muscle excitation and decreases in neuromuscular efficiency than LL, but neither LLBFR nor LL affected average submaximal concentric torque.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨低负荷血流限制(LLBFR)和低负荷(LL)抗阻运动对肌肉兴奋、神经肌肉效率和平均力矩的急性影响。

方法

11 名男性(年龄±标准差=22±3 岁)随机进行 30 次单侧腿伸展运动,负荷为 1 次最大重复值的 30%,同时评估表面肌电图(sEMG)和力矩。采用多项式回归分析和斜率比较来观察反应模式和变化率。

结果

sEMG 振幅在 LLBFR(11 人中的 9 人)和 LL(11 人中的 8 人)以及复合反应中增加(R=0.939-0.981)。对于 LLBFR,11 个人中有 5 个人和复合反应的 sEMG 振幅增加幅度更大。同样,神经肌肉效率在 LLBFR(11 人中的 8 人)和 LL(11 人中的 5 人)以及复合反应中下降(r=0.902-0.929),但 LLBFR 比 LL 对个体(11 人中的 4 人)反应的下降幅度更大。对于平均亚最大向心力矩,复合反应中有个体增加、减少和不变(R=0.198-0.325)。

结论

与 LL 相比,LLBFR 引起的肌肉兴奋增加和神经肌肉效率降低更为明显,但 LLBFR 和 LL 均未影响平均亚最大向心力矩。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894b/10233231/528aaa4e51f9/JMNI-23-165-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894b/10233231/07ad69578821/JMNI-23-165-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894b/10233231/38ea5d47cf3f/JMNI-23-165-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894b/10233231/528aaa4e51f9/JMNI-23-165-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894b/10233231/07ad69578821/JMNI-23-165-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894b/10233231/38ea5d47cf3f/JMNI-23-165-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894b/10233231/528aaa4e51f9/JMNI-23-165-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Acute effects of low load blood flow restricted and non restricted exercise on muscle excitation, neuromuscular efficiency, and average torque.低负荷血流限制和非限制运动对肌肉兴奋、神经肌肉效率和平均扭矩的急性影响。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2023 Jun 1;23(2):165-174.
2
Greater neuromuscular fatigue following low-load blood flow restriction than non-blood flow restriction resistance exercise among recreationally active men.在业余活跃男性中,低负荷血流限制比非血流限制抗阻运动后神经肌肉疲劳更大。
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Jul 1;128(1):73-85. doi: 10.1152/jn.00028.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
3
Patterns of responses and time-course of changes in muscle size and strength during low-load blood flow restriction resistance training in women.女性在低负荷血流限制抗阻训练中肌肉大小和力量的反应模式及变化时间进程。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 May;121(5):1473-1485. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04627-2. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
4
Neuromuscular function after a bout of low-load blood flow-restricted exercise.低负荷血流限制运动后神经肌肉功能。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Jan;45(1):67-74. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31826c6fa8.
5
Muscle fatigue in response to low-load blood flow-restricted elbow-flexion exercise: are there any sex differences?低负荷血流限制下的肘关节屈伸运动所致肌肉疲劳:是否存在性别差异?
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Oct;118(10):2089-2096. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3940-x. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
6
Effects of load matched isokinetic versus isotonic blood flow restricted exercise on neuromuscular and muscle function.等速与等张血流限制运动对神经肌肉和肌肉功能的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Aug;23(8):1629-1637. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2023.2184724. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Hemodynamic Responses to Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction and Unrestricted High-Load Resistance Exercise in Older Women.老年女性对低负荷血流限制和无限制高负荷抗阻运动的血流动力学反应。
Front Physiol. 2018 Oct 1;9:1324. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01324. eCollection 2018.
8
Acute Neuromuscular Adaptations in Response to Low-Intensity Blood-Flow Restricted Exercise and High-Intensity Resistance Exercise: Are There Any Differences?低强度血流限制运动和高强度抗阻运动对急性神经肌肉适应的影响:有何不同?
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Apr;32(4):902-910. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002022.
9
Effects of low load exercise with and without blood-flow restriction on microvascular oxygenation, muscle excitability and perceived pain.低负荷运动结合或不结合血流限制对微血管氧合、肌肉兴奋性和感知疼痛的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Apr;23(4):542-551. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2039781. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
10
The perceptual responses of individuals with multiple sclerosis to blood flow restriction versus traditional resistance exercise.多发性硬化症患者对血流限制与传统抗阻运动的感知反应。
Physiol Behav. 2021 Feb 1;229:113219. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113219. Epub 2020 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of high-load and combined high- and low-load resistance training on electromyographic behavior during an absolute muscular endurance task.高负荷以及高负荷与低负荷相结合的抗阻训练对绝对肌肉耐力任务期间肌电图行为的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05849-4.
2
The Effect of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Isokinetic Strength Muscle Thickness and Athletic Performance.血流限制训练对等速肌力、肌肉厚度和运动表现的影响。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2025 Jun 1;25(2):208-218.
3
Effect of training status on muscle excitation and neuromuscular fatigue with resistance exercise with and without blood flow restriction in young men.

本文引用的文献

1
Greater neuromuscular fatigue following low-load blood flow restriction than non-blood flow restriction resistance exercise among recreationally active men.在业余活跃男性中,低负荷血流限制比非血流限制抗阻运动后神经肌肉疲劳更大。
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Jul 1;128(1):73-85. doi: 10.1152/jn.00028.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
2
Is There a Minimum Effective Dose for Vascular Occlusion During Blood Flow Restriction Training?血流限制训练期间血管闭塞是否存在最小有效剂量?
Front Physiol. 2022 Apr 8;13:838115. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.838115. eCollection 2022.
3
Defining Training and Performance Caliber: A Participant Classification Framework.
训练状态对年轻男性在有或无血流限制的阻力运动中肌肉兴奋和神经肌肉疲劳的影响。
Physiol Rep. 2025 Mar;13(6):e70274. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70274.
4
Progression and perceptual responses to blood flow restriction resistance training among people with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者对血流限制阻力训练的进展及感知反应
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Jan;125(1):103-116. doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05584-2. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
5
Blood flow restriction increases necessary muscle excitation of the elbow flexors during a single high-load contraction.血流限制增加了单次高负荷收缩时肘屈肌的必要肌肉兴奋。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Jun;124(6):1807-1820. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05405-y. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
定义培训和绩效水平:参与者分类框架。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022 Feb 1;17(2):317-331. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0451. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
4
Acute Effects of Local Ischemic Hypoxia and Systemic Hypoxemia on Neuromuscular and Cognitive Function.局部缺血缺氧和全身低氧血症对神经肌肉和认知功能的急性影响。
High Alt Med Biol. 2022 Mar;23(1):18-25. doi: 10.1089/ham.2021.0096. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
5
Isometric blood flow restriction exercise: acute physiological and neuromuscular responses.等长血流限制运动:急性生理和神经肌肉反应
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb 12;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13102-021-00239-7.
6
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Neural Adaptations Following Blood Flow Restriction Training: What We Know and What We Don't Know.血流限制训练后神经适应性的系统评价与荟萃分析:我们所知与未知
Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 4;11:887. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00887. eCollection 2020.
7
On the Influence of Group III/IV Muscle Afferent Feedback on Endurance Exercise Performance.肌梭传入反馈对耐力运动表现的影响。
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2020 Oct;48(4):209-216. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000233.
8
Determining the Sites of Neural Adaptations to Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.确定抵抗训练引起的神经适应性的部位:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2020 Jun;50(6):1107-1128. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01258-z.
9
Low-load blood flow restriction elicits greater concentric strength than non-blood flow restriction resistance training but similar isometric strength and muscle size.低负荷血流限制训练比非血流限制抗阻训练引起更大的向心力量,但等长力量和肌肉大小相似。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Feb;120(2):425-441. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04287-3. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
10
The validity of the EMG and MMG techniques to examine muscle hypertrophy.肌电图和肌音图技术检测肌肉肥大的有效性。
Physiol Meas. 2019 Mar 13;40(2):025009. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab057e.